... I'm not seeing where the contention is here. If you think the study is bogus, check the materials and methods section. If you think it is worthless to do the study, ask yourself if you had evidence of the amount of destruction trolls bring to the ability to have a cogent conversation before this.
This isn't rocket science, nor is it supposed to be divisive. There are trolls on every side of a political discussion, so I don't know why there would be any defensiveness. And hell, I doubt this study got much grant money (if it makes you feel any better).
victor809 wrote: