RICKAMAVEN
13 years ago
but if any one tries to kill more kids, they might do something.

this is a very sick country.
teedubbya
13 years ago
POOPY!
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
IF ONLY WE DIDN'T ABORT THEM!!!!


They'd be 7 now!!!
DrafterX
13 years ago


this is a very sick country.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:





true... true.... but banning assault rifles won't help.... 😟
dubleuhb
13 years ago
I guess you better have a talk with your boy Harry. Ask him why, probably wants to hold onto his power by being re-elected, ya think ?
paulkeck
13 years ago

but if any one tries to kill more kids, they might do something.

this is a very sick country.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



you are just joking right!!!:-k πŸ™
ZRX1200
13 years ago
Uncle RICK I have no clue (as usual) WTF you are talking about. Did the senate shelf a weapons ban??



If so you do remember NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


All people shot and killed were shot with HANDGUNS.




POOPY AGAIN YOU OLD GOAT.
paulkeck
13 years ago

Uncle RICK I have no clue (as usual) WTF you are talking about. Did the senate shelf a weapons ban??



If so you do remember NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


All people shot and killed were shot with HANDGUNS.




POOPY AGAIN YOU OLD GOAT.

ZRX1200 wrote:




x2 and yes the senate took out the assualt weapons ban rightly so because they knew that we wouldnt stand for that gay crap
DrafterX
13 years ago

The leader of the Democrat-controlled Senate on Tuesday dropped a proposed assault weapons ban from the chamber’s gun-control package – dealing a blow to supporters of the ban, though it could still come up for a vote.

The sponsor of the measure, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., revealed that Reid told her the proposed ban would not be in the initial package. Feinstein said she's "disappointed" with the decision, and is expected to nevertheless offer it as an amendment.

But the move by Reid to cut it from the main bill signals a lack of congressional support for a proposal that would not only revive, but strengthen, the decade-long ban that expired in 2004.

The proposed ban passed was passed last week by the Senate Judiciary Committee, along with three other measures. The others dealt with providing more school safety aid, expanding federal background checks on potential gun buyers and helping authorities prosecute illegal gun traffickers.

Feinstein has led the gun-control charge since President Obama called for federal legislation in the wake of the Newtown and other mass shootings.

The assault weapons ban was the most controversial of the major proposals to restrict guns that have been advanced by Obama and Senate Democrats. Because of that, it had been expected that the assault weapons measure would be left out of the initial package the Senate considers, with Democrats hoping the Senate could in turn amass the strongest possible vote for the overall legislation.

There are 53 Democrats in the Senate, plus two independents who usually vote with them.

Having a separate vote on assault weapons might free moderate Democratic senators facing re-election next year in Republican-leaning states to vote against the assault weapons measure, but then support the remaining overall package of gun curbs.

Gun control supporters consider a strong Senate vote important because the Republican-run House has shown little enthusiasm for most of Obama's proposals.

Feinstein said Reid told her there would be two additional votes. One would be on her assault weapons ban, which also includes a ban on ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips.

Many Democrats think the ban on large-capacity magazines has a better chance of getting 60 votes than the assault weapons ban



Film at 11......😟






I wouldn't be surprised if they threw it in at the last minute of a midnight vote or somethin tho.... 😟
DrafterX
13 years ago

NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


.

ZRX1200 wrote:




ya, but the guy saw one once.... 😟
dpnewell
13 years ago
I did hear that there's a bill to take handguns away from cranky old men who post gibberish. Now that's gun control I can stand behind. :-"
DrafterX
13 years ago
California has found a way to take your guns anyway.... if I understand this right, they can throw you in a mental facility for evaluation and even if you check out ok you now have a mental history which allows them to remove all guns from your home... even if they aren't yours..... 🀐
dpnewell
13 years ago

Uncle RICK I have no clue (as usual) WTF you are talking about. Did the senate shelf a weapons ban??



If so you do remember NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


All people shot and killed were shot with HANDGUNS.




POOPY AGAIN YOU OLD GOAT.

ZRX1200 wrote:



Yet the Obama administration and his propaganda arm, the MSM, continue to lie to the American people and his supporters don't seem to mind one bit.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
BUY A SHOTGUN....BUY A SHOTGUN!!!

DrafterX
13 years ago
can I put a folding stock and a 8 round high capacity tube on it..?? πŸ˜•
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
When you have a sick country you treat it by taking away the mandated meds and giving it clean food, water, and air for a start. Our wiring is being fxcked!
Then, we can discuss the banning nonsense.
luckypbk1
13 years ago

Uncle RICK I have no clue (as usual) WTF you are talking about. Did the senate shelf a weapons ban??



If so you do remember NO GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLE WAS

U S E D

AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING.


All people shot and killed were shot with HANDGUNS.




POOPY AGAIN YOU OLD GOAT.

ZRX1200 wrote:


Amen!!!!
DadZilla3
13 years ago

but if any one tries to kill more kids, they might do something.

this is a very sick country.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



2,790 kids were killed in the USA so far today. No firearms of any kind were involved.

http://www.numberofabortions.com/ 
ZRX1200
13 years ago
At least he spelled right.
schusler
13 years ago

can I put a folding stock and a 8 round high capacity tube on it..?? πŸ˜•

DrafterX wrote:


no
Users browsing this topic