wheelrite
13 years ago
I am against the Death Penalty but if anyone deserves it, this Butcher Abortionist does..








By MARYCLAIRE DALE Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA May 13, 2013 (AP)







An abortion doctor was convicted Monday of first-degree murder and could face execution in the deaths of three babies who were delivered alive and then killed with scissors at his grimy, "house of horrors" clinic.

In a case that became a grisly flashpoint in the nation's abortion debate, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, 72, was also found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the overdose death of an abortion patient. He was cleared in the death of a fourth baby, who prosecutors say let out a whimper before the doctor cut the spinal cord.

Gosnell, who portrayed himself as an advocate for poor and desperate women in an impoverished West Philadelphia neighborhood, appeared hopeful before the verdict was read and calm afterward.


wheel
ZRX1200
13 years ago
I am pro death penalty and I hope he rots in hell.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
Take him out the same way he took out the other babies.

Justice will be served.

People turned their backs on what was going on there for years because if they uttered the horrors...they feared abortions would no longer be paid by the taxpayers.

Burner02
13 years ago

I am pro death penalty and I hope he rots in hell.

ZRX1200 wrote:






+1
paulkeck
13 years ago

+1

Burner02 wrote:


X2
dpnewell
13 years ago
What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.
wheelrite
13 years ago

What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.

dpnewell wrote:



um, yes..

both are murder,,,
HockeyDad
13 years ago

What's the difference between snipping a baby's spinal cord seconds after it leaves the womb, or chopping it to pieces a minute or two earlier while it is still in the womb? Personally, I feel both are murder, yet our twisted society calls one murder, and the other a "medical procedure". The whole thing seems hypocritical if you ask me.

dpnewell wrote:




One is murder, one is a woman's right to choose.
jackconrad
13 years ago
Death is too good for him. Torture for years is more suitable

Send Him too Egypt with a Convert to Christianity or be damned sign on his back ..
MACS
13 years ago

One is murder, one is a woman's right to choose (murder).

HockeyDad wrote:



Fixed!
Gene363
13 years ago
I have no problem with the death penalty. Show me a crowd bomber, child toucher or sex pervert and I'll be glad to pull the switch, but not in this case. The woman he killed by neglect/incompetence is bad, but not death penalty level murder.

As for killing those babies, unless they prosecute the co-conspirators he shouldn't get the death penalty. Who are these co-conspirators? The mothers of those children that came to this doctor to get rid of their babies, Like paying for a hit on someone, they conspired to murder. If it wasn't for them, there would have been no dead babies.

I'm not defending this guy, this story made me cry. When he started out doing abortions it was in the early stages of pregnancy. Back in a time women were dying all the time from back street abortions. Over time, it got later and later into the pregnancy, each time a desperate mother asking him to kill her child. I don't care who you are, after a while that has to mess up your mind. Again, it's no excuse for what went on in the clinic, but it might explain how it ended up where it did.

Brewha
13 years ago
This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .
wheelrite
13 years ago

I have no problem with the death penalty. Show me a crowd bomber, child toucher or sex pervert and I'll be glad to pull the switch, but not in this case. The woman he killed by neglect/incompetence is bad, but not death penalty level murder.

As for killing those babies, unless they prosecute the co-conspirators he shouldn't get the death penalty. Who are these co-conspirators? The mothers of those children that came to this doctor to get rid of their babies, Like paying for a hit on someone, they conspired to murder. If it wasn't for them, there would have been no dead babies.

I'm not defending this guy, they story make me cry. When he started out doing abortions it was in the early stages of pregnancy. Back in a time women were dying all the time from back street abortions. Over time, it got later and later into the pregnancy, each time a desperate mother asking him to kill her child. I don't care who you are, after a while that has to mess up your mind. Again, it's no excuse for what went on in the clinic, but it might explain how it ended up where it did.

Gene363 wrote:



what difference do co-conspirators have to do with his guilt and punishment ??

he did what he did ...

btw,

he kept Fetus' in jars and did what he did for money,,

The reason why he did it means nothing,,,


wheel,
Gene363
13 years ago

This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .

Brewha wrote:



It doesn't require religion to know killing children is just a bad idea all by it's self.

wheelrite
13 years ago

This guy deserves to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Same as the wing nuts who blow up clinics or kill the abortion doctors.
The law is the law.

But at least this criminal will give folks a chance to push their religious agendas . . . . .

Brewha wrote:



dude,,
even this post is beneath you,,,

religion has nothing to do with killing babies,,,

This case strips away the antiseptic vision of Abortion that Planned Parenthood has depicted for the masses,,
ever seen a puppy put down ?

wheel,
Confuzed
13 years ago
Snipping the spinal cord of a 32 week old baby--- Murder. Taking money to do it time and time again--- Just disgusting. There is no "choice" at this stage... Stuffing a baby in a shoe box after you sever his/her spinal cord? Seriously? The mothers who knew what they were getting themselves into should be punished the same.

The dealth penalty is too easy... I say pass him around D Block for a few years THEN fry his ass... I can admit I probably shouldn't feel this way...maybe I'm wrong...can't help it, though...

This guy is more wretched than Kevorkian..
Gene363
13 years ago

what difference do co-conspirators have to do with his guilt and punishment ??

he did what he did ...

btw,

he kept Fetus' in jars and did what he did for money,,

The reason why he did it means nothing,,,


wheel,

wheelrite wrote:



He did what he did because the mothers of those dead babies wanted it done and paid to get done. Unless I missed something in the trial, he didn't kidnap them and bring them in for an abortion, they wanted those babies dead. That is what abortion is all about. As big as some of those babies were those mothers felt their kicking in their womb, but they still went to this monster to get them murdered.

I'm not giving him a by, he needs to be severely punished. He will die in jail either doing life or awaiting another death penalty appeal. Let him stay alive and become the new face of the pro choice movement. Or, as Mac aptly posted, the right to chose murder. Stoning him to death seams almost too good, but we have laws and I don't want to be anything like Iran.

wheelrite
13 years ago


He did what he did because the mothers of those dead babies wanted it done and paid to get done. Unless I missed something in the trial, he didn't kidnap them and bring them in for an abortion, they wanted those babies dead. That is what abortion is all about. As big as some of those babies were those mothers felt their kicking in their womb, but they still went to this monster to get them murdered.

I'm not giving him a by, he needs to be severely punished. He will die in jail either doing life or awaiting another death penalty appeal. Let him stay alive and become the new face of the pro choice movement. Or, as Mac aptly posted, the right to chose murder. Stoning him to death seams almost too good, but we have laws and I don't want to be anything like Iran.

Gene363 wrote:



ok Gene,,

whatever,,,

So,
If I want someone dead, the guy that kills that person gets a free pass ?

convaluted logic my friend,,
blakedeshotel1
13 years ago
One thing I have to say bout this low life piece of **** I'm all for death penalty but I think thats to light of a sentence nail that bastid to a tree with honey all over him and make sure he is in a bed of fire ants and let them eat him alive screw abortion a human is a human no matter age r size its still murder. Ok that's my rant if some one doesn't like it oh well you'll get over r not any way I don't care good night folks


Blake
Gene363
13 years ago

ok Gene,,

whatever,,,

So,
If I want someone dead, the guy that kills that person gets a free pass ?

convaluted logic my friend,,

wheelrite wrote:



Free pass? Hey, do I smell alcohol?#-o #-o #-o

Users browsing this topic