Last time I flew into Indiana the pilot reminded us to set our watch back two hundred years . . .

Just sayin'

Brewha wrote:

Last time I flew into Indiana the pilot reminded us to set our watch back two hundred years . . .

Just sayin'

Brewha wrote:

I'd rather live 200 yrs behind the times than embrace the future if this is what it's all about....just sayin

Man I love the Mid-West 🍺

TMCTLT wrote:

So a future where people mind their own business and government doesn't regulate people's personal private relationships scares you?

Wow.

borndead1 wrote:

No.... a world where the minorities beliefs now outstrip the majorities does though...thanks for playing tho!!! -- I'm not talking about beliefs. I'm talking about equality UNDER THE LAW. The only way we can ever have equality under the law is to have anonymity and autonomy under the law. The law should not recognize gay/straight, black/white, male/female, etc. And the will of the majority cannot always be trusted. After all, a majority of people re-elected Obama.


Look, these folks already enjoyed the freedom to live their lives as they see fit....but they will NOT be happy until laws are in place that cover " just them "

I'm sorry but when OUR Constitution upholds an individuals right over the general feeling and rights of the masses....something HAS gone seriously wrong. IMVHO -- There can be no liberty without individual liberty. As long as you do not injure me physically or damage my property, it's none of my business what you do.

What's next Born.....peoples rights to marry animals of their choice??? I'm sorry but I do NOT believe this is part of the Natural Order of things -- This is the most ridiculous, far-fetched, uber reactionary, ignorant argument I've ever heard. Animals are not people and cannot give consent. Get real.

TMCTLT wrote:

Let me ask you a question. Do we really want a government that is SO powerful that it can restrict, regulate, and define relationships between consenting adults? Why do you want government to stay out of your health care, your wallet, and your gun cabinet but you want government to dictate the terms of people's personal PRIVATE relationships?

It's none of my business if 2 homos wanna get married. And it's none of YOUR business. And it's sure as hell none of the government's business.

borndead1 wrote:

That's the whole problem...it's NOT equality. It's an avenue in which to become a "protected class" kinda like minorities, used freely as an excuse to keep employers from firing an individual based on performance (or lack thereof) and I think you know full well what I'm talking about. And YES this WILL be used that way too (endless litigation brought about " ( they let me go because I'm gay etc. etc. I don't want the government involved in much, but they already ARE in my healthcare (therefore my wallet and you know damn well they will NOT stop trying to get in my "gun cabinet" until they're successful.



This is the most ridiculous, far-fetched, uber reactionary, ignorant argument I've ever heard. Animals are not people and cannot give consent. Get real.


Oh and to your take on animal / human relationships....does YOUR logic also apply to an unborn child?????
They cannot speak for themselves either...YOU GET REAL

TMCTLT wrote:

Com'on now, you know it's only right and left. You pick and side and take on all their beliefs.

z6joker9 wrote:

So a future where people mind their own business and government doesn't regulate people's personal private relationships scares you?

Wow.

borndead1 wrote:

We are talking about consenting ADULTS. Not animals and not children. You automatically assume I am pro-abortion simply because I don't want government to dictate the terms of people's personal private relationships? That speaks volumes about your political views and opinions.

borndead1 wrote:

Ahh herein lies the problem, it's NOT consenting adults...it's the woman ALONE in most cases who gets to make this decision. Last I checked she can't get pregnant on her own. Please don't mis-understand me as I DO NOT want government in my business any more than necessary either.

TMCTLT wrote: