Abrignac
12 years ago
And by “some things,” he means uninsured families, medical devices, workplace flex accounts, small businesses, Health Savings Accounts, savings income, uni

During his Tuesday remarks at the Clinton Global Initiative, President Obama admitted that his health care law raises taxes: “So what we did — it’s paid for by a combination of things. We did raise taxes on some things.”

“Some things” is an understatement. Below is just a partial list of Obamacare’s new or higher taxes on Americans:

Starting in tax year 2013:

Obamacare Medical Device Tax: Medical device manufacturers employ 409,000 people in 12,000 plants across the country. Obamacare imposes a new 2.3 percent excise tax on gross sales – even if the company does not earn a profit in a given year. In addition to killing small business jobs and impacting research and development budgets, this will make everything from pacemakers to artificial hips more expensive.

Obamacare High Medical Bills Tax: Before Obamacare, Americans facing high medical expenses were allowed a deduction to the extent that those expenses exceeded 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). Obamacare now imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI. Therefore, Obamacare not only makes it more difficult to claim this deduction, it widens the net of taxable income.

According to the IRS, 10 million families took advantage of this tax deduction in 2009, the latest year of available data. Almost all are middle class. The average taxpayer claiming this deduction earned just over $53,000 annually. ATR estimates that the average income tax increase for the average family claiming this tax benefit will be $200 - $400 per year. To learn more about this tax, click here.

Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Tax: The 30 - 35 million Americans who use a pre-tax Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their family’s basic medical needs face a new Obamacare cap of $2,500. This will squeeze $13 billion of tax money from Americans over the next ten years. (Before Obamacare, the accounts were unlimited under federal law, though employers were allowed to set a cap.) Now, a parent looking to sock away extra money to pay for braces will find themselves quickly hitting this new cap, meaning they would have to pony up some or all of the cost with after-tax dollars.

Needless to say, this tax will especially impact middle class families.

There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. Nationwide there are several million families with special needs children and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. This Obamacare tax provision will limit the options available to these families.

Obamacare Super Saver Surtax: A new, 3.8 percent surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single). This tax hike results in the following top tax rates on investment income:




Capital Gains

Dividends

Other*


2013+

23.8%

43.4%

43.4%


*Other unearned income includes (for surtax purposes) gross income from interest, annuities, royalties, net rents, and passive income in partnerships and Subchapter-S corporations. It does not include municipal bond interest or life insurance proceeds, since those do not add to gross income. It does not include active trade or business income, fair market value sales of ownership in pass-through entities, or distributions from retirement plans. (Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 87-93)

Obamacare Medicare Payroll Tax Increase:




First $200,000
($250,000 Married)
Employer/Employee

All Remaining Wages
Employer/Employee


Pre-Obamacare

1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed

1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed


Obamacare

1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed

1.45%/2.35%
3.8% self-employed


Starting in tax year 2014:

Obamacare Individual Mandate Non-Compliance Tax: Starting in 2014, anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance – as defined by President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services -- must pay an income surtax to the IRS. The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that six million American families will be liable for the tax, and as pointed out by the Associated Press: “Most would be in the middle class.”

In addition, 100 percent of Americans filing a tax return (140 million filers) will be forced to submit paperwork to the IRS showing they either had “qualifying” health insurance for every month of the tax year or they obtained an exemption to the mandate.

Americans liable for the surtax will pay according to the following schedule:




1 Adult

2 Adults

3+ Adults


2014

1% AGI/$95

1% AGI/$190

1% AGI/$285


2015

2% AGI/$325

2% AGI/$650

2% AGI/$975


2016 +

2.5% AGI/$695

2.5% AGI/$1390

2.5% AGI/$2085


(Delayed by Obama to 2015) Obamacare Employer Mandate Tax: If an employer does not offer health coverage, and at least one employee qualifies for a health tax credit, the employer must pay an additional non-deductible tax of $2,000 for all full-time employees. This provision applies to all employers with 50 or more employees. If any employee actually receives coverage through the exchange, the penalty on the employer for that employee rises to $3,000. If the employer requires a waiting period to enroll in coverage of 30-60 days, there is a $400 tax per employee ($600 if the period is 60 days or longer).

Obamacare Tax on Health Insurers: Annual tax on the industry imposed relative to health insurance premiums collected that year. The tax phases in gradually until 2018. Fully imposed on firms with $50 million in profits.

Starting in tax year 2018:

Obamacare Tax on Union Member and Early Retiree Health Insurance Plans: Obamacare imposes a new 40 percent excise tax on high cost or “Cadillac” health insurance plans, effective in 2018. This tax increase will most directly affect union families and early retirees, who are likely to be covered by such plans. This Obamacare tax will be levied on insurance policies whose premiums exceed $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family. Middle class union members tend to be covered by such plans in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed.


http://atr.org/obama-obamacare-raise-taxes-things-a7883#ixzz2fvuLPvmB 
HockeyDad
12 years ago
Sometimes free isn't free.
ZRX1200
Brewha
12 years ago
Obamacare requires personal accountability for health care and forces competition in the market place - two core Republican principals. And yet the whining never stops.

I guess the GOP is stuck on Cruz control . . . .
Abrignac
12 years ago

Obamacare requires personal accountability for health care and forces competition in the market place - two core Republican principals. And yet the whining never stops.

I guess the GOP is stuck on Cruz control . . . .

Brewha wrote:



At what cost?
Gene363
12 years ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKMWow_Sk04&feature=youtu.be

ZRX1200 wrote:




Well that made my day... crappier. Thanks for posting the link.

ZRX1200
12 years ago
You're welcome Gene.

Brewha, if you like personal responsibility why do you like big gov't?
ZRX1200
12 years ago
Also it's not really personal responsibility when it only works with credit subsidies who are paid by who? Not the insuree.

This program is designed to fail to get single payer.
Brewha
12 years ago

You're welcome Gene.

Brewha, if you like personal responsibility why do you like big gov't?

ZRX1200 wrote:


Z, "big government" is one of those weasel phrases that sounds like it really means something, but it is just grand standing rhetoric.

Besides, I was pointing out that Republicans should love the idea of people having to take responsibility for themselves. I mean, where is the ubiquitous "boot strap" lecture now?
Brewha
12 years ago

At what cost?

Abrignac wrote:


You think people should get healthcare for free?
ZRX1200
12 years ago
The only responsibility being taken is redistribution.

This will not work.
Abrignac
12 years ago

You think people should get healthcare for free?

Brewha wrote:



I'm thinking you have a brick wall. Have the two of you had your daily conversation?
dubleuhb
12 years ago
So forcing the younger generations to pay into something they don't need to pay for those that do is personal responsibility ?

We'll see how they feel about when the bill comes due, LMAO!!
dubleuhb
12 years ago

You think people should get healthcare for free?

Brewha wrote:


It was highly touted as ''free'' when they pushed it through, but you knew that right ?
rfenst
12 years ago

You think people should get healthcare for free?

Brewha wrote:



If they must have it and cannot otherwise obtain it; or it will cost us less to openly provide it in the long run than not provide it up front- yes.

And, I have no problem paying taxes used for this.
Brewha
12 years ago

The only responsibility being taken is redistribution.

This will not work.

ZRX1200 wrote:


I credit you with being a smart fellow Z. Perhaps you are right. But just seeing the way the mouthpieces of big business are crying about this makes me disagree.

Anyway, we shall see.
ZRX1200
12 years ago
Oh ^ that is how this was sold????

I just hope the political price is paid before we achieve full Banana Republic status under martial law.
Brewha
12 years ago

If they must have it and cannot otherwise obtain it; or it will cost us less to openly provide it in the long run than not provide it up front- yes.

And, I have no problem paying taxes used for this.

rfenst wrote:


No argument. If fact I admire the style of it and agree.

Careful Mr. Fenst, people might start calling you an altruist . . . .
Brewha
12 years ago

I'm thinking you have a brick wall. Have the two of you had your daily conversation?

Abrignac wrote:


I do not believe that trading forum postings with you constitutes a conversation.
But if you feel that way, I'm good.
Brewha
12 years ago

Oh ^ that is how this was sold????

I just hope the political price is paid before we achieve full Banana Republic status under martial law.

ZRX1200 wrote:


Come on man, if you want to carp about something, how about millitary spending? Legislation bought by Monsato? Rap music? Or the needless proliferation of twerking . . . .
Users browsing this topic