Republicans hate abortions almost as much as they hate welfare babies.

HockeyDad wrote:

Thats the same tired argument.

Have you ever bothered asking the age of these sonograms? Have you ever seen a sonogram of a fetus at the number of months in which it's actually legal? Probably not, since it doesn't further your agenda.

For the record, you probably can't even do a 3d sonogram of a fetus within the age window abortions are legal.

victor809 wrote:

Why does every abortion argument here presume the women are poor and living on government?

rfenst wrote:

I thought the poor people kept them, for more gov money.

sd72 wrote:

Didn't we do this a couple months ago? Same arguments, usual suspects?

sd72 wrote:

Why does every abortion argument here presume the women are poor and living on government?

rfenst wrote:

Consider the narrow minded conservatives who make the argument. The last thing they would do is put it in a clear light . . . If they did, it would be obvious they are just pushing a religious agenda.

It is a telling dichotomy that those who shead crocodile tears for a terminated pregnancy (even with a morning after pill) are the first to call for an end to social programs that might actually help the unwanted children whom the parents simply cannot afford to have.

Brewha wrote:

you are a moron,,,,

View these images of a 20week old pre-born human...


wheel,

wheelrite wrote:

20 weeks.
Do you know how many abortions are performed at 20 weeks? (Just so you know... because I'm not sure you understand, 20 weeks is 5 months. That's 2nd trimester.)

Only 4.6% of all abortions are performed from 16weeks onward. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/06/02/GR2009060200592.html)

You're using an absolute outlier as an argument. That's kind of a "moron" thing, don't you think?

victor809 wrote:

Why does every abortion argument here presume the women are poor and living on government?

rfenst wrote:

Read this Moron,,



"Supreme Court Prevents Arizona From Enforcing Its 20-Week Abortion Ban


abortion safe and legal
CREDIT: Feminist Campus

On Monday, the Supreme Court declined to review a lower court’s decision to block a 20-week abortion ban from taking effect in Arizona. That decision ensures that the law will remain permanently blocked, and women in the state will continue being able to access abortion care until the point of viability as defined under Roe v. Wade, around 24 weeks of pregnancy.

“This ensures that no Arizona women’s lives or health are harmed by this callous and unconstitutional law,” Nancy Northrup, the president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. Northrup’s organization partnered with the ACLU to file suit against Arizona’s abortion ban in 2012.


you need to be better informed Vic,,,,

:-k

wheelrite wrote:

sounds like a different argument to me.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Why does every abortion argument here presume the women are poor and living on government?

rfenst wrote:

sounds like a different argument to me.... 😟



just to be clear Wheel was outraged at 55 million but now the 4.6% seems to be his argument...

DrafterX wrote:

No argument there. Too often abortion is used as a method of birth control

JadeRose wrote: