Large minority sounds kinda 'off'. You know what I mean?

sd72 wrote:

bottom line,,,,

Sucking a baby from the womb is murder,,,,

why do you think a person can be prosecuted for the killing of a Pregnant woman and/or her unborn baby ?

splain please...


wheel,

wheelrite wrote:

Large minority.
Big midget.
Government intelligence.
Good fats.

That kinda off. Don't know too many conspiracy thingys. Did you hear this from Mel Gibson.??

sd72 wrote:

Sounds like they wanted to make them feel equal to the whites.

sd72 wrote:

I'm offended.

sd72 wrote:

[color=darkblue]Yes, unfortunately a lot of folks think making something illegal or not talking about the subject will make it go away. Like putting men and women on Navy ships and getting all surprised when sailors turn up pregnant.

Perhaps if the curriculum stayed with how babies are made they wouldn't have been badgered into discussing all sexual activities, e'g', gay sex. Even calling it Human Reproduction vs Sex Education would help sell the program; even lesbians can get pregnant.[/color]

Gene363 wrote:

something struck me as incompatible in the above paragraphs. I finally figured out what didn't jibe in my mind, and it may be just me who missed it.

We agree it won't go away by making it illegal or ignoring it, but you then say sex ed classes should not have been recognizing sexual activity that (I hate to assume) you believe should go away. Ignore the other stuff and it will go away??

I'm not attacking you, but have I hit on an inconsistency in your position when it comes to an honest school curriculum that addresses the reality that some of those other forms of sexuality exist, whether we approve of them or not? Should they have ignored their existence...in hopes they would go away? Like ignoring the discussion of birth control for heterosexuals?

Just like we agree that sex ed classes speaking frankly about birth control is not the same as teaching teens to have sex, do we differ in that simply discussing alternative sexual life styles (that we may not approve of either) in class is not tantamount to encouraging same sex relations?

I'm missed for your usual balance.

frankj1 wrote:

Republicans hate abortions almost as much as they hate welfare babies.

HockeyDad wrote:

People don't seem to realize that poor people cost them money, even if you don't give them ANY government assistance. Give them nothing, and you have to pay more for police to ensure they don't try taking anything. And you have to pay for a justice and penal system after they try taking something. The entire time, you have to spend your days dodging the trash and sh#t the poor leave on the sidewalk after sleeping there.

victor809 wrote:

I see what you are saying.

I want:

Kids to know what causes a woman to get pregnant

What birth control and how it works

Why they have no business bringing kids into the world until they are older, have a job etc.

Problems:

Some people think by not talking about it and not giving them birth control they won't have sex.

When you try to teach that, people call it sex education, it should be reproduction and birth control.

Once you call it Sex Education, the arguing starts.

Some people do not want their children exposed to alternative sex information. Meanwhile, when the gay folks and some others hear about "sex education" they immediately insist the curriculum include gays and whatever else they can think of in the category of sex and with the, "All this is perfectly normal." label.

Meanwhile, reproduction and birth control information never gets taught because they various faction can never agree.

People of the opposite sex can create a baby regardless of their sexuality or preferences. If you teach reproductive processes and birth control, those that need to know what causes a baby and what prevents one will get the knowledge they need.

Gene363 wrote:

I see what you are saying.

I want:

Kids to know what causes a woman to get pregnant

What birth control and how it works

Why they have no business bringing kids into the world until they are older, have a job etc.

Problems:

Some people think by not talking about it and not giving them birth control they won't have sex.

When you try to teach that, people call it sex education, it should be reproduction and birth control.

Once you call it Sex Education, the arguing starts.

Some people do not want their children exposed to alternative sex information. Meanwhile, when the gay folks and some others hear about "sex education" they immediately insist the curriculum include gays and whatever else they can think of in the category of sex and with the, "All this is perfectly normal." label.

Meanwhile, reproduction and birth control information never gets taught because they various faction can never agree.

People of the opposite sex can create a baby regardless of their sexuality or preferences. If you teach reproductive processes and birth control, those that need to know what causes a baby and what prevents one will get the knowledge they need.

Gene363 wrote:

Vic surprises me, He isn't outraged that most,by percentage, babies killed by abortions are minorities,,,

Is Victor a Eugenic racist ?


wheel,

wheelrite wrote: