I bet you're a woman... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Thats why we dont let some folks think outside the box. Its a slippery slope.
Next you will deduce that if you are having anal sex, you may as well use your buddies, who you know better. And you can swap a box of cigars afterwards.

Carry on thinking outside the box...

scompay wrote:

No but my job lets me see this the average person would not. Do you know when we audit for taxes, how many times we see folks sneaking money to give to children they have had outside marriage, never, when they do give, they want to claim it. Guess how much money we see being snuck out for mistresses and sex??

I bet you know yourself.

scompay wrote:

I even put "box" in capital letters, but the pun still sailed over your head.

But I'm glad that your train of thought led you directly to dude-on-dude activity.
And I'm glad you're posting here, because your suggestions themselves are abortions.

tailgater wrote:

... women want children.

scompay wrote:

Hilarious, that you think the pun went over my head.
You sir are a tailgater. Did I use a pun then?

scompay wrote:

55 MILLION abortions since Roe v wade.

I'm glad that these woman wanted those children. I'd hate to see the number otherwise.

tailgater wrote:

It was prolly only around 10 million men who caused all that.

HockeyDad wrote:

HD:

How about just Dorian Gray?

gryphonms wrote:

Exactly. Folks want it both ways.

scompay wrote:

I knew a few girls that wanted it both ways.

Made contraception a lot easier.

victor809 wrote:

Thank you for a non-personal post.
Again; 55 million men who got these women pregnant. Or are we saying that these 55 million women got pregnant because they wanted to and then changed their minds.

scompay wrote:

None of this should be taken personally.

But your logic on this topic is practically beyond comment.
You are basically calling men rapists.
They finish their business without the woman's consent.
They drag girls to abortion clinics.
They hate children.

It's ridiculous and any one of these points could barely describe even a small fraction of the population.
Yet you attribute this to 100%.
We all run around impregnating helpless women, who are then FORCED to have an unwanted abortion against their will.


I could sit here and be civil and tell you how your logic is merely inconclusive.
But then I'd be woefully understating the reality of it all.

tailgater wrote:

Let me rephrase:

Explain your logic to me.
Why would a woman get pregnant, only to turn around and go through humiliating, painful and life scaring surgery.

Do you have any other precedence of them doing such counterproductive things without any upshot.

scompay wrote:

Is this a serious question?

Because it's posts like these last two that give me the impression that I'm not dealing with an adult.

tailgater wrote: