DrafterX
12 years ago
I heard the First lady was getting one this year for saving the fat kids.... 😟
Gene363
12 years ago

I heard the First lady was getting one this year for saving the fat kids.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Yes, they will be serving fra gras and tater tots at the awards dinner.

DrMaddVibe
12 years ago

You say that like they won't be underwater...

victor809 wrote:




Damn subprime mortgages!!!
DrafterX
12 years ago
the underwater theory again..??? 🤦

throw an ice cube in a glass of water and watch it melt Victor... is your glass overflowing now..??? 😕
victor809
12 years ago

Henry Fonda???? Really??? You can't do better than mistakenly giving credit to a Hollywood actor?

The Grapes of Wrath is an American realist novel written by John Steinbeck and published in 1939. The book won the National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize for fiction, and it was cited prominently when Steinbeck won the Nobel Prize in 1962.

cacman wrote:



Um, I believe he is quoting the movie, Grapes of Wrath, as acted by actor Henry Fonda. Looks like the quote itself is very similar between the book and the movie, but the book doesn't appear to have the "if casey knowed why" phrase. Not sure why you would say he's mistaken...
DrafterX
12 years ago
Axl wrote that book man.... 🤐
victor809
12 years ago

the underwater theory again..??? 🤦

throw an ice cube in a glass of water and watch it melt Victor... is your glass overflowing now..??? 😕

DrafterX wrote:




Drafter. You realize that's just wrong, right? While the whole "global warming" vs "global cooling" vs "extreme climate change" thing is fun to poke at, IF there were significant enough temp increase, you would see a rise in water levels. "But Victor! the guy on the interwebs asked me about ice cubes and water glasses and it coincides with my current beliefs so I like him!"

Two problems with your "ice cube in a glass of water" theory.
1 - A lot of our ice ISN'T in the ocean. It's on land, next to the ocean (Antarctica). It melts and runs in...that adds mass. that's like taking an ice cube, melting it, and pouring the water into your glass. Will the water level rise?

2 - Saltwater vs Freshwater. When water freezes it excludes the salts in its crystalline structure. So what you have is fresh water ice, floating in saltwater. However, saltwater is MORE DENSE than fresh water (this is why you float better in saltwater)... and ICE floats better in saltwater. In fact, this causes it to displace less water than in fresh water. So when it melts, and the fresh water mixes with the saltwater, it increases the volume.
DrafterX
12 years ago
never gonna happen anyway... 🤐
victor809
12 years ago

never gonna happen anyway... 🤐

DrafterX wrote:



But you concede that if the planet's temperature did in fact rise enough to melt the water currently in ice form, we will see rising sea levels?

To say that it is "never gonna happen" is an awfully bold statement. In fact it's one of those statements which is most likely to eventually be proven wrong. Not because of any special climate science or anything... but simply because given enough time (and "never" spans all of time), just about all circumstances will rear their ugly head.
DrafterX
12 years ago

But you concede that if the planet's temperature did in fact rise enough to melt the water currently in ice form, we will see rising sea levels?

victor809 wrote:




[-( 🤐
victor809
12 years ago

[-( 🤐

DrafterX wrote:



Is that a yes or a no?

Let me rephrase that...
Is that a "yes victor, I agree with the most basic concepts of physical chemistry" or a "no victor, I don't believe in the most basic concepts of physical chemistry"?
DrafterX
12 years ago
that's a no, never gonna happen.... 🤐 🤐
victor809
12 years ago

that's a no, never gonna happen.... 🤐 🤐

DrafterX wrote:



That wasn't my question.
I asked (and you even quoted it):

"But you concede that if the planet's temperature did in fact rise enough to melt the water currently in ice form, we will see rising sea levels?"

When you say "no, never gonna happen" are you referring to the temperature shift or the basic chemistry which would cause the water levels to rise?
DrafterX
12 years ago
No to a temperature shift that would melt the ice caps.... 😟




:-k
I wonder where God got all the water when he flooded da earth.... 🤔
victor809
12 years ago

No to a temperature shift that would melt the ice caps.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



But that wasn't the question. I stated:
"But you concede that if the planet's temperature did in fact rise enough to melt the water currently in ice form, we will see rising sea levels?"

So, you are conceding that IF the temperature rose enough in the poles to melt the ice caps, we would see rising sea levels?
DrafterX
12 years ago
victor809
12 years ago

[-( 🤐

DrafterX wrote:



And now, what is this about?

You realize when you don't use actual words, it makes it feel like I'm arguing with a 2nd grader, right?
DrafterX
12 years ago
I will concede that IF the temperature rose enough in the poles to melt the ice caps, we would not see a significant rise sea levels.... 😟
Gene363
12 years ago

I will concede that IF the temperature rose enough in the poles to melt the ice caps, we would not see a significant rise sea levels.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



What, the world isn't flat and gravity isn't universal?

victor809
12 years ago

I will concede that IF the temperature rose enough in the poles to melt the ice caps, we would not see a significant rise sea levels.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Define significant.
Users browsing this topic