[email protected]

teedubbya wrote:

The love affair with putin and the russians is interesting. So far all he has done is take back the equivelent of what would be northern mississippi if they had left the US. They left, the USSR fell apart. They failed in Afghan and basically everywhere else. I don't get the love.

teedubbya wrote:

no love.... just couldn't think of a better comparison.... not like I could use Canada or France... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

no way man.... 🤐


I bet he'd put on one of those net shirts you like if you asked him tho.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Leave Bloody out of this

teedubbya wrote:

The love affair with putin and the russians is interesting. So far all he has done is take back the equivelent of what would be northern mississippi if they had left the US. They left, the USSR fell apart. They failed in Afghan and basically everywhere else. I don't get the love.

teedubbya wrote:

Don't give two chits about him. If I were Russian though I'd prolly like him as he is trying to bring back some national pride. I wonder if the national treasure will be returned as well???

Abrignac wrote:

personally i think she will run if for no other reason then to piss them off. if she runs the repubicans will be out of the white house for another 4 years at least.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:

She will run and she's doing it purely for the money. Her new book outlines her "vision & goals" and is a "paid for" pretense of the rhetoric we can expect to hear during her campaign. She'll rake in another 10-15mil from books sales and "campaign" contributions instead of doing the 10-15yrs in jail for crimes against the Country.

cacman wrote:

Isn't this the New American Way? Worked for all the other politicians. [ram27bat]

Buckwheat wrote: