frankj1
12 years ago

That's interesting. Do you put lipstick on the side of your thumb and fore finger?

Abrignac wrote:


Senor Wences?
drywalldog
12 years ago
If you look closely the crates are all dated 2007, that's clearly in Bushes tenure.
wheelrite
12 years ago

If you look closely the crates are all dated 2007, that's clearly in Bushes tenure.

drywalldog wrote:




and you are expert in munitions ?

who knew ?

I need a Flame Thrower, can you help ?


wheel,,
Abrignac
12 years ago

and you are expert in munitions ?

who knew ?

I need a Flame Thrower, can you help ?


wheel,,

wheelrite wrote:



Eat some red beans. Bend over in the target's direction. Blow and light. Problem solved.
drywalldog
12 years ago
Well you are a flamer.
TMCTLT
12 years ago

If you look closely the crates are all dated 2007, that's clearly in Bushes tenure.

drywalldog wrote:




That's all you need for proof huh Dog? What if they were from 07 but sitting stockpiled until gifted away? That water gettin heavy yet?
victor809
12 years ago

That's all you need for proof huh Dog? What if they were from 07 but sitting stockpiled until gifted away? That water gettin heavy yet?

TMCTLT wrote:



Apparently all you need to accuse the president of high treason is a video of a lot of boxes. Glad that's all you need for proof. 😣

DrMaddVibe
12 years ago

Apparently all you need to accuse the president of high treason is a video of a lot of boxes. Glad that's all you need for proof. 😣

victor809 wrote:




Um...he's not accusing...he's pointing out a fact that could potentially be true. BIIIIIIG difference.

There's just not enough definitive and verifiable evidence to make the video credible. We don't have the Lewinski blue dress moment yet.
Abrignac
12 years ago
OP was a stretch of epic proportions.
victor809
12 years ago

Um...he's not accusing...he's pointing out a fact that could potentially be true. BIIIIIIG difference.

There's just not enough definitive and verifiable evidence to make the video credible. We don't have the Lewinski blue dress moment yet.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



"Do you want proof of high treason? Look no further than video footage received from Libya called “the sea of arms.”"

The original poster was accusing someone of high treason based on a video of boxes.

Yet when one poster makes a comment that one box says 2007... suddenly that's not enough evidence to pin it on bush.

Yet a lot of boxes is evidence to pin something on the current administration.

The whole thing is stupid, there's no evidence of anything here. To think some shred of it is more evidence than other shreds is, as Abrignac put it, a stretch of epic proportions.
frankj1
12 years ago
a fact is already true, not potentially true...or else it is mere speculation and he is just accusing.
teedubbya
12 years ago
That's a fact.
Users browsing this topic