Maybe Nevada's driving laws are too lax. I hear that your chances of being killed in an auto accident and being murdered by a gun are nowt virtually equal. Too bad a good guy with a car couldn't have stopped the bad guy with the car.

tonygraz wrote:

Do you even take yourself seriously?

tailgater wrote:

LOL - you have the balls to link an NRA article. Talk about prejudicial.

tonygraz wrote:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=internet+argument

dstieger wrote:

Of course, Paul. And, as some say; "they all stink"

But, why do you routinely take Tony's bait? He rarely (never?) even makes a cogent argument. He just flings **** at the wall to watch you pull your hair out.

dstieger wrote:

Personal opinions are like azzwholes....we all have one and are entitled to it even if you don't agree with it.

TMCTLT wrote:

i like watching you two (and others) slap box

a little scuffle never hurt anyone

gummy jones wrote:

Your ignorance is showing again....

I knew you wouldn't read it, so here is the last paragraph for your Dumb Ass



The only way that the number of gun-related deaths compares to the number of vehicle accident deaths, is if vehicle accident deaths are compared to the grand total of suicides, murders, defensive homicides by private citizens, legal intervention homicides by law enforcement officers, and the relatively smaller number of firearm accident deaths. And that math is as slippery as a garage floor mopped with 10W-30.

TMCTLT wrote:

I never argue with my azzhole. Payback would be, well, not good!

frankj1 wrote:

LOL - you have the balls to link an NRA article. Talk about prejudicial.

tonygraz wrote:

Ladies and gentlemen.
I introduce to you:
Frank the contortionist!

tailgater wrote: