tailgater
10 years ago

One could wonder how you thought of that ?

tonygraz wrote:



Yes.
Because conversations on these boards rarely drift in that direction.

But you go on wondering.
Or is hoping more accurate?
Covfireman
10 years ago

As a point of science, a .223 bullet is fully capable of penetrating 8โ€ thick steel, and has plenty of mass to do so. However, propelled from a conventional gun it would lack the required velocity.

I suppose if you shot the bullet from space towards the sun, allowing for gravitational acceleration, it would gain the required velocity. But you would need really, really good aim......

Brewha wrote:




By the the time you get it to accelerate to the required velocity friction will cause it to decrease in mass .



I see tony has accelerated his lying elsewhere.
victor809
10 years ago
Cov... That was my first thought... But he specified in space. In theory he would get continal acceleration under those conditions, and very little friction due to the vacuum...
victor809
10 years ago
Tail... I'd agree with you, but you see it from some more than others. I have to say I find it funny when it is used so frequently by those who claim to not want to know what goes on in a bedroom of two men...
MACS
10 years ago

Tail... I'd agree with you, but you see it from some more than others. I have to say I find it funny when it is used so frequently by those who claim to not want to know what goes on in a bedroom of two men...

victor809 wrote:



I am smart enough to know what goes on... I just don't ever want to see it. [starfish]
Brewha
10 years ago

By the the time you get it to accelerate to the required velocity friction will cause it to decrease in mass .



I see tony has accelerated his lying elsewhere.

Covfireman wrote:


The point is that with sufficient velocity a grain of sand would penetrate the plate - mass being only one of the variables.

I mean a blade of straw can pierce a telephone pole in a tornado.

It's interesting though. At what speed does air friction begin to degrade the bullet vs. the speed required to penetrate the steel. I think it would work in the atmosphere - without resorting to a Lorentz transformation.....
DrafterX
10 years ago
ever wonder where chikens go during tornadoes..?? ๐Ÿ˜•
Jnorman
10 years ago

ever wonder where chikens go during tornadoes..?? ๐Ÿ˜•

DrafterX wrote:




Well, if they are cooked, they would go in my belly๐Ÿ˜
tonygraz
10 years ago
Popeye saves them.
Covfireman
10 years ago

The point is that with sufficient velocity a grain of sand would penetrate the plate - mass being only one of the variables.

I mean a blade of straw can pierce a telephone pole in a tornado.

It's interesting though. At what speed does air friction begin to degrade the bullet vs. the speed required to penetrate the steel. I think it would work in the atmosphere - without resorting to a Lorentz transformation.....

Brewha wrote:




Actually the real point was that tonygraz is a liar and what he lied about is physically impossible.
DrafterX
10 years ago
But he saw it happen... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
tonygraz
10 years ago
No he didn't.
DrafterX
10 years ago
That's what he said... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
gummy jones
10 years ago

That was what I found with a quick read. I do not by any means think the issue is that simple. But I did want to clearly differentiate between fetus and baby. This is where legal rights change greatly under present laws if I understood what I read.

From a moral viewpoint it becomes much simpler for me. Once the fetus is viable it should be protected.

Speyside wrote:


I think your attempt to clearly differentiate was unsuccessful.

"When a baby in utero (fetus) becomes viable" is an ever changing target in modern medicine

So you are suggesting that, in your viewpoint, baby murder vs fetus termination is a floating standard dependent upon technology? That seems pretty shaky bud.
Covfireman
10 years ago

No he didn't.

tonygraz wrote:



There's the truth he didn't see it.
Rsmith956
10 years ago

All I saw was the steel, don't know if the bullet came out pristine tho. I still remember the AR15 that some clown used a hand reload in, despite the warnings not to.

tonygraz wrote:



it must have been very, very mild steel for a 223 to go through it.

I'd have to actually see that first hand to believe it.

I'm dubious a 223 would fully penetrate 8" of aluminum.
tamapatom
10 years ago

ever wonder where chikens go during tornadoes..?? ๐Ÿ˜•

DrafterX wrote:


The other side of the road?
tamapatom
10 years ago

You mean corundum?

Brewha wrote:

or platimum?
tamapatom
10 years ago
Or not.
frankj1
10 years ago
Users browsing this topic