Oh yes. Don't forget the other constitutional scholars that flat out disagree with him. Just because the Canadian count proclaims himself as something doesn't make it true. He really isn't holier than most, he really isn't less of a politician than his peers (the way he manipulates is pure politics), he really isn't more of a constitutionalist than anyone else, and he is not like Reagan....his proclamation that really gets under my skin. He is a great deceptor and a great spinner of tales who very well may rise to power using unsavory means and by manipulating the process and the times. No one in his own party wants him. Yet there he is. Interesting rise.
If he gets the nomination I've been casually talking to a few old friends who worked with me on a couple campaigns over 20 years ago who would like to find a way to work against him.
teedubbya wrote: