Really no secret as to why Hillary set up the private server. Sure the IRS will uncover in their review of the Clinton Foundation.








WTF was I thinking?

Burner02 wrote:

I guess she should have refused to share her tax retuns - Like Lord Cheeto....

Brewha wrote:

I guess she should have refused to share her tax retuns - Like Lord Cheeto....

Brewha wrote:

What's the point? If Trump did something wrong, he'd have been investigated by the IRS. The Dems would have made certain of that, so instead they just complain about him not releasing the information so the mere appearance of impropriety will possibly cost him votes.

MACS wrote:

I suspect that if we saw this returns we would know the depth of his lies about giving to charities, his purported buisness success, and the untold millions he's spent of hair product.....

Brewha wrote:

I don't care about looking at either the Trump or Clinton tax returns, period. It's not going to change anyone's mind so it's just a picking point to keep you busy. Sorry, no apologies, IMO, you're either misinformed, plain old dumb or a tool of some party boss is you think this is an issue.

FWIW, you Trump haters are in the very same class as the Clinton haters that were always making up crazy crap about Bill. I cannot stand the slimy SOB, but I never felt the need to make crap up about his misdeeds, they are manifold.

Never satisfied to disagree, you are hellbent to destroy the target of your anger. If there isn't plenty of genuine, not rumors and BS, negative facts about the person you don't like then STFU. [frypan]

Gene363 wrote:

I've found there's plenty of mud to drag Hillary around in... kind of funny to see so many just ignore it... 🤣

DrafterX wrote:

It's a fair thing to take issues with, so cool your jets Gene.

An there are plenty of negative facts about him; Trump Universite - pending RICO charges, Trump Airlines - yet another bankruptcy, a plethora of stupid ideas that sound "cool"......

Look at it this way; the last presidential candidate that refuse to show their returns was Nixon. You of course remember what kind of man he turned out to be.

Brewha wrote:

Meh, I said I didn't care to see either candidate's tax return. Keep your argument bait, just keep working on the definition of "fair" it's a little more nuanced that anything negative you think/say about people and topics you dislike.

Oh, and you might not want to talk to me anyway, I'd refuse to show you my tax return as well, so that should, in your way of thinking, tell you everything you need to know about me. Granted, neither you nor I are running for office, but if it's reasonable why not publish you own right here on Cbid, just to prove it's reasonable.

Gene363 wrote:

Stay with me on this Gene. It's like in poker - a bluffer often has a tell.

An yes it's ok to not show your returns to demonstrate your honesty, history and good will. I reckon you can just say no. But you tell me; this guy is the richest, most successful swinging cod there is - according to him. But he won't show us......like everyone else running does.

Trump is dirty and his tax records would show it. You know it and I know it. He is bluffing to see if he can get away with it...

Brewha wrote:

I wasn't with you from the beginning, besides, you don't need Trumps return, you're already convinced; facts and evidence are unnecessary.

Gene363 wrote:

Fair enough. Truth is I never had any faith in Trump. And to my mind he is the greater of the two evils - by a damn site.

But what would the process be if we did not speak our minds?

Brewha wrote: