😠

DrafterX wrote:

Logically if A = B, with B being the condition it is unsayable, and C = A, shouldn’t C = B also?

gary96 wrote:

I would think that only a person who actually effed his mother would be offended by the term.

banderl wrote:

I heard there are no ducks at altitude

teedubbya wrote:

yes I did play off the overly sensitive part but didn't miss the point. I actually agreed with some of what you said so didn't comment. it is weird how we as a society find one more or equally offensive as the other.. but we do....

to be honest I didn't feel like I was responding directly to you or your thought.... those words sparked a thought and I typed it.... it isn't all about you

meh.

teedubbya wrote:

So it would be OK to call someone's wife a whore.
You know. Because if she isn't one then she won't be offended.

Of course, if she does get offended then she must be one.
Right?

🇨🇮

tailgater wrote:

You have a nub too huh?

teedubbya wrote:

You can call anybody whatever you want.

banderl wrote:

You responded to my post, the subject, the words in it, but not to me directly?

Holy crap.

But I agree that "we as a society" do find some terms more offensive than others.
It's what I stated already.
What I am offering up for discussion is that we shouldn't let the media define the levels of offensiveness. And it is the media. Because there is no reason that any person with a sane mind could ever think that it's worse to be called something based on nationality, religion or skin color, than it is to be called a vile incestuous pervert.
Just as example.


Besides, whatever happened to "sticks and stones"?

tailgater wrote: