Mr. Jones
9 years ago
This whole post is a joke.

WHAT KIND OF MORON WOULD RISK A BIG-TIME FELONY CONVICTION TO VOTE MORE THAN ONCE?

Even if your a BUM and homeless...
$50 bucks or $100 bucks is not worth
A FELONY stint in "the BIG HUT"...

Get real....

I'd be willing to bet....
That the actual number of illegal double or triple
Voters is W.A.Y. less than 50K votes over the entire nation...
And that is SO infantismal as to not sway any national election.
opelmanta1900
9 years ago

This whole post is a joke.

WHAT KIND OF MORON WOULD RISK A BIG-TIME FELONY CONVICTION TO VOTE MORE THAN ONCE?

Even if your a BUM and homeless...
$50 bucks or $100 bucks is not worth
A FELONY stint in "the BIG HUT"...


Get real....

I'd be willing to bet....
That the actual number of illegal double or triple
Voters is W.A.Y. less than 50K votes over the entire nation...
And that is SO infantismal as to not sway any national election.

Mr. Jones wrote:



and yet, it happens!... apparently lots of someones thinks it's worth it...
DrafterX
9 years ago
Still puzzled how a little bit of crime is ok... 🤔
opelmanta1900
9 years ago
cuz... it's not that big a deal and stuff... it barely ever happens so it's not worth trying to prevent... I mean, obviously I don't care either way... but if you're in favor of voting laws you're a racist and an idiot because it never happens and when it does it doesn't make a difference and stuff... but it never happens...
teedubbya
9 years ago
I know an accountant that will spend 100,000 to recover 10 bucks. because a buck is a buck.
opelmanta1900
9 years ago
I don't... but i know an accountant that thinks stealing $10 should be illegal regardless of how meaningless $10 is to some people...
teedubbya
9 years ago

I don't... but i know an accountant that thinks stealing $10 should be illegal regardless of how meaningless $10 is to some people...

opelmanta1900 wrote:



and as a result is willing to spend 100,000 in a quest towards zero and since they know of $10 will say the whole schpeel is invalid..
frankj1
9 years ago
obviously crime is crime.
but not all crimes should be the stuff of huuuuuge debates.

DrafterX
9 years ago
and who gets to decide..?? 😕
teedubbya
9 years ago
DrafterX
9 years ago
Sweet..!! 🤣
opelmanta1900
9 years ago

and as a result is willing to spend 100,000 in a quest towards zero and since they know of $10 will say the whole schpeel is invalid..

teedubbya wrote:



I think your metaphor/simile/whatever it is got messed up somewhere... no one is spending 100,000 votes to stop 10 cases of voter fraud...
opelmanta1900
9 years ago

obviously crime is crime.
but not all crimes should be the stuff of huuuuuge debates.

frankj1 wrote:


can't help but feel like it wouldn't be a huge debate if states were just allowed to have voter ID laws... because the argument against them seems to be that they aren't necessary... or that they cost money... or that they aren't effective...

that's what government is!!!! costly, unnecessary, inneffective laws!!!

so let this just be another one... and when trump loses the presidential race to the second biggest sh*tbag on the planet - due to him being the single biggest sh*tbag on the planet - it will be one less weapon in his and his supporters arsenal of complaints...

teedubbya
9 years ago
you are right there isn't an exact equivelence
DrafterX
9 years ago

you are right there isn't an exact equivelence

teedubbya wrote:




you could count how many BigMacs were sold that day... 😟
dstieger
9 years ago
Return to the Forum without posting
tailgater
9 years ago

I know an accountant that will spend 100,000 to recover 10 bucks. because a buck is a buck.

teedubbya wrote:



They're called the IRS.
frankj1
9 years ago

can't help but feel like it wouldn't be a huge debate if states were just allowed to have voter ID laws... because the argument against them seems to be that they aren't necessary... or that they cost money... or that they aren't effective...

that's what government is!!!! costly, unnecessary, inneffective laws!!!

so let this just be another one... and when trump loses the presidential race to the second biggest sh*tbag on the planet - due to him being the single biggest sh*tbag on the planet - it will be one less weapon in his and his supporters arsenal of complaints...

opelmanta1900 wrote:


I have stated above (somewhere) that I would not be troubled by showing an ID, and that 30-something states do require some form...so they are allowed. Boston Globe pointed out that voting (so far) is not hackable.

But you'd like the untrustworthy government to start an ID program to keep potential violations of rampant fraud less likely than the bare minimum that have been recorded historically? Are you sure? Do you trust them to do it right?

I know our comparisons have been meaningless on this thread, but there are ways of preventing even more rampant crime, but I don't think most would like them.

frankj1
9 years ago

They're called the IRS.

tailgater wrote:


you. sir, are the best!
Users browsing this topic