ZRX1200
9 years ago
Christine Gregoir vs Dino Rossi.

Rossi won two counts, then DemocRATs magically found a box of missing ballot that pushed her JUST past him.

Oh.....and there were 5k dead people votes in that election who overwhelmingly voted for her.
teedubbya
9 years ago
The court disagreed.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
9 years ago
There's a song by Kelly Clarkson I think you'd like, Victor.

victor809
9 years ago
If you were correct more often I wouldn't have to point out where you're wrong.
DrafterX
9 years ago
Sounds like we're damn lucky to have you.... 🤔
tonygraz
9 years ago
Somebody has to fact check you right wingers.
MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
9 years ago

Somebody has to fact check you right wingers.

tonygraz wrote:



Says the guy who is almost as full of sh*t as Victor. 🙄
victor809
9 years ago
If I'm full of sh*t then you'd have no problem pointing out where I am wrong... Instead of resorting to grade school "know it all" comments.
tailgater
9 years ago

The court disagreed.

teedubbya wrote:



Yes.
And no.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Judge-upholds-Gregoire-s-election-Rossi-won-t-1175262.php 

"... required Rossi to show that Gregoire owed her victory to illegal votes. They also call for the litigants to identify specific illegal votes and by whom they were cast. And they say that if there's no sign of corruption by elections workers in handling an illegal vote that can't be assigned to one candidate or the other, that vote must be treated as valid."

In other words: they couldn't prove that specific votes were illegal.

Of course, a simple ID requirement would have helped immensely.

But that's an outrageous suggestion and obviously intended to disenfranchise liberal voters only.

(insert sarcasm here).



DrafterX
9 years ago
true.. true... 😟
teedubbya
9 years ago
So it's yes. The allegations were never proven and elsewhere it seems to indicate they were proven false. The pesky courts demanded proof. TG that's the side you are normally on.

There really is no credible proof of any fraud or need to do anything. It was an allegation without proof and continues to be. If there was proof it would be huge news. Instead its blog fodder.

Now days it seems that allegations are good enough and proof unnecessary. If you are investigated enough you must be guilty.
DrafterX
9 years ago
Not if Obama squashes the investigation up front... 🤐
teedubbya
9 years ago
is that what's been happening? I guess we don't need proof. Get a rope.
DrafterX
9 years ago
prolly shouldn't string this president up tho.. any others we might get away with... just sayin.. 😟
tonygraz
9 years ago
Looks like we better keep an eye now on the republicans in Florida and Indiana for significant voter fraud.
tailgater
9 years ago
OJ was innocent.
tailgater
9 years ago
OJ was innocent.
teedubbya
9 years ago
Lol. I use that all the time too. It's fun.
DrafterX
9 years ago
I heard they're just gonna give the job to Trump and cancel the election... 😟
teedubbya
9 years ago
True true. The bundys will take over all the polling stations because the government is unfair and stuff.

I heard OJ is going to be nominated for the Supreme Court.
Users browsing this topic