Wikileaks - Good or bad? · Page 2

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

gummy jones
Herf-A-Holic

9 years ago

#21

How can you turn information over to the proper authorities, when the proper authorities are involved in the felonies being exposed themselves???

cacman wrote:

of, for and by the people - aint ya heard!?!

Covfireman
Aficionado

9 years ago

#22

As Dave said, as a person who held a clearance I understand the dilemma of this. Secrets involving national security are supposed to be protected. Government corruption needs to be exposed, however; so I can't hate the leaks, entirely.

What HRC did, though... is something for which a military member would have been court-martialed. And that is a cold, hard fact.

MACS wrote:

I don't understand how anyone who has held a security clearance wouldn't be outraged over her deeds but by the way the FBI and DOJ let her (hilary) slide without prosecution?

It's a shame Snowden had to do what he did but our government is invading everyone's privacy . As to if Snowden is a traitor? He would be one to this government but not to the American people . HIstory will decide if he's a traitor . I don't know of anyone who was killed by what he exposed but he did set our Intelligence agencies back years . If I had the knowledge he had of the extent of the NSA's domestic activities I don't know where I'd have went with it .

teedubbya
Herf-A-Holic

9 years ago

#23

Cacman there are absolutely avenues that could have and were not followed. They are available.

Snowden is a traitor. If you are happy having him sit with Putin good on you but there is this v for vendetta facade that is bunk.