How is the Clinton Foundation working out of late?

Hear the cash has dried up since influence is no longer being pedaled.

It's still going, although they've scaled back their CGI branch. If you want to donate here you go:

https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2016-contribute/donate_now 

Mythbusting website Snopes got caught pushing a misleading fact-check that offered cover for Democratic Reps. Keith Ellison and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who remained seated during the second standing ovation for Carryn Owens, the widow of deceased Navy SEAL Ryan Owens.

First, the facts.

Carryn Owens received two standing ovations during President Trump’s address to Congress Tuesday night. It was during the second, longer ovation (which lasted for a full two minutes) that Ellison and Wasserman Schultz remained seated.

Sobbing widow of slain Navy Seal receives 2 minute standing ovation.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz & Keith Ellison stay firmly seated, no claps

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 1, 2017

FOR THE RECORD: Carryn Owens had 2 ovations.
DWS & Ellison stood for her intro.
The really long, emotional 2 min one, they did not stand.

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 1, 2017

Snopes, which is staffed with a solid lineup of leftists, used the fact that Ellison and Wasserman Schultz stood and clapped during the first standing ovation as reason to declare it “false” that they remained seated during the second standing ovation, which they clearly did. (As John Sexton at HotAir points out, Snopes significantly revised their “fact-check” without any sort of editor’s note, contrary to journalistic standards.)

fhttps://t.co/LraFf628HM  pic.twitter.com/CIV6sOAjyU

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 1, 2017

Snopes got the facts wrong despite deploying not one but two fact-checkers to the case.


The first, Kim LaCapria, is a known leftist who has a history of struggling with the facts. The second was David Mikkelson, Snopes’ co-founder.

Snopes does this **** all the time. Clearly a circle jerk of leftist tropes that can't be trusted. If something is pro-right they either pick and chose the "facts" to report like the above example, or if that can't be had they skip the subject rather than fact check and report TRUE.

:-k
So, snopes hates widows of fallen soldiers. .?? Those Bassards. .!! 😠

Your new catch phrase?

If you are a total liar, the best thing you can do is attack the fact checkers. And maybe the press too.

You sure know alot about lying and stuff. .. 😟

Probably the most pathetic thing you've posted trolly.

Z, that's a bold statement.

http://www.snopes.com/democrats-stand-seal-widow/ 

Any of you actually check snopes before posting articles that say snopes lied and didn't have an editor's note?

I see an editor's note... I see a full video... I see a full explanation.

Seems to me that the article above is highly misleading.

But true.
I snopesed it.

Not even close to the fake news you buy into. And don't call Drafter trolly.

Ya.!! 😠