coming for you, not going after you...gross.

and, no. you did not mention Clinton nor sex, but where you did fit in was as an instant apologist defender. Again. And again. (I am addicted to your writing style!)

You got lumped in with other instant apologist defenders who did mention Clinton/sex. Again.

Is it so difficult to address Trump posts with Trump posts (not just you Joe, but the 98.2% cons who reside here) and leave Clinton/Obama/Clinton deflections out of the thread? Mentioning the negatives of the two C's and the Big O don't justify or excuse Trump's behavior.

I think the goal posts for morality have never moved, unless one separates pre and post election behavior...I don't.

That said, I personally don't care about any of their sexcapades, unless the partner was (legally) violated or cover-ups ensued. More of a gauge of character, I suppose.

frankj1 wrote:

So if our next POTUS takes to the twitter machine, and I call him out on it, will you NOT mention Trump?

Duly noted.

tailgater wrote:

So you think Clinton and Obama behavior excuses Trump? Good to know.

Speyside wrote:

Not sure where you're going with this?

Clinton was a dog. He used his elected office to bang chicks. We know this to be true. We also know he took things too far by inviting the fat intern into his oval office for some alone time during business hour. All facts. All defended by the democrats.

Now we hear about President Trump being a dog. Using his position as a rich dude to bang chicks. Even if we assume this to be true it was never on the public dime. The accusation is from before he his presidency. And the same democrats who defended Clinton are attacking President Trump.

But if this is mentioned the immediate retort is for the democrat to snort "oh boy, Clinton again".

It's not a justification for Trumps alleged actions.
It's a condemnation.
And not of Clinton.
But of those Trump-haters/Clinton-supporters who embrace hypocrisy like a binky.

The same people who get upset with the so-called "fake news" readily embraced Clinton's "I did not have sexual relations" lie. they justified it. And they accepted his response of "it depends what the definition of "is" is."


So to be clear, what Clinton did does NOT excuse Trump.
But it clarifies the partisan hypocrisy and exposes the ridiculousness from which the left mount their attacks.

With that said, it would still be pretty cool to have a beer and a smoke with Bubba.

tailgater wrote:

You probably want to supply your own cigars, lest you wind up with an infused "El Shrimpo Casa Del Habana"#-o

edit I wrote this and then let the dog out, came back and posted and you had beat me to the punch8-[

RMAN4443 wrote: