Comey was obligated to answer questions of the President honestly, instead he mislead or lied by omission. I wouldn't expect you to know the difference.

Donald has never entered the political realm except for running and winning this Land's highest office.

Comey can be attributed to several crimes not even counting the carpetbagging server issue or the dossier! Nice try.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Comey is twisted

teedubbya wrote:

being twisted and self serving is not the equivalent of liar.

teedubbya wrote:

I know.

or am I lying?

teedubbya wrote:

You saying "connect the dots" isn't actually providing any evidence.

It's been a popular claim recently, and only recently, that the FBI is somehow in the bag for the democrats. No one has actually provided evidence.

If you have no evidence then that's fine. It just makes it clear what kind of person you are

victor809 wrote:

I don't need to provide evidence, I never said it.

Burner02 wrote:

And how do you believe the FBI has politicised their position of power? What have they done which implies they are not discharging their duties in a fair and equitable manner? What proof do you have (actual proof) to support these claims?

victor809 wrote:

Huh?

rfenst wrote:

With all due respect Burner, sounds to me like you're describing Donald and not Comey.
1. Donald doesn't do any of his thinking inside the box. He said it himself, he likes chaos!

2. Trump's detractors, and not the media, but the masses of people that didn't vote for him think his agenda favors the wealthiest people in the country and not the middle class eg tax cut. Most of these same people don't think being 'equitable' is even in his vocabulary.
(Omit joke "along with many other words ")

3. Polarization is at the core of Donalds success. You do see that, right?

Since our country's inception, federal employees have of course held personal political opinions. I agree that federal agents should never act on their partisan motives. But I dont see comey as someone with a political agenda. Just a personal one.

Is Comey a grandstander, sure, an entrepreneur yep, a Republican that helped Donald win the election, that too. His strong, granted, profitible objection to Donald is NOT based at all on Donald's politics, it's based on his character.

I'm not condoning the timing of the book or much of what he's been saying (small hands etc) but I think the message he's sending is apolitical and frighteningly valid. He's a whistle blower the way I see it. In the final analysis I see a flawed patriot.

One last thing: nowadays everyone seems to have an agenda. Even fact check sites. Do I know Comey so well that I can vouch for him entirely? Course not.
My 2c

HuckFinn wrote:

Huck, on your three points:

1. I would encourage individuals to think outside the box. When they start coloring outside the box in most cases is not good.

2. As far as Trump goes, the left should of had a better message and a better candidate. No one to blame but themselves.

3. The polarization I see for the most part is the left will not accept the fact that Trump won and Clinton did not. The left has taken on the role of the Federalist from the early 1800's and the Federalist creed of "rule it or ruin it." It really gets old.

Burner02 wrote:

I don't need to provide evidence, I never said it.

Burner02 wrote:

Very educational read Burner.

spey wrote:

And totally partisan

huck wrote:

Agreed, to the institution. In this case the FBI.

burner wrote:

I assume this is where you try to spout the nonsense that the FBI is somehow democrat leaning...

victor wrote:

Not the first time you have been wrong. Even a smart boy like you should be able to connect the dots on this one.

burner wrote:

You saying "connect the dots" isn't actually providing any evidence.
It's been a popular claim recently, and only recently, that the FBI is somehow in the bag for the democrats. No one has actually provided evidence.
If you have no evidence then that's fine. It just makes it clear what kind of person you are

victor wrote:

There is no room in our society for the politicization of these positions of power. If allowed we are headed down a road of no return.
If a person feels that politicization of the positions of power is acceptable then that person is part of the problem.

burner wrote:

And how do you believe the FBI has politicised their position of power? What have they done which implies they are not discharging their duties in a fair and equitable manner? What proof do you have (actual proof) to support these claims?

victor wrote:

I don't need to provide evidence, I never said it.

burner wrote:

Never said that about the FBI.

You need to provide evidence that I did.

burner wrote:

Trump is dangerous..?? How many terrorists and criminals did Obama let back on streets..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

Agreed, to the institution. In this case the FBI.

Burner02 wrote: