DrafterX
8 years ago
Love you too man... 🤣
Speyside
8 years ago
At least Tail is consistent. Wrong, but consistent.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
When talking politics, wrong is subjective...

When you're talking left and right, both extremes are bat sh1t.
delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
8 years ago

Who did that..?? If he backs of zero tolerance I'll be disappointed.. the kids were pawns because Pelosi said they were... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Trump and Lewandowski ramped up the dehumanization of immigrants...


https://www.ktvb.com/video/syndication/veuer/trump-democrats-want-illegal-immigrants-to-infest-the-country/602-8164360 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/critics-say-trumps-description-of-immigrants-recalls-nazi-propaganda/ 


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/corey-lewandowski-fox-news-trump-down-syndrome-border-family-separation-a8407371.html 


Pelosi is so bad, she wants everyone to eat broccoli...but she actually said the kids were prawns, and that they would go well with broccoli and some sort of alfredo sauce...
DrafterX
8 years ago
Abrignac
8 years ago

And the crime committed by these kids who are doing the time is...

Go ahead, we'll wait.

fiddler898 wrote:



Nice of you to blur the line.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
CNN feed is still bombarded with this crap...

I now know why they don't have comments enabled on their articles... cause they know people would call them out on their horsesh1t and they wouldn't be able to afford mods to delete it all in a timely fashion.

The only thing that will make the left happy is putting things back to the way they were.

I'm pretty sure they have an underground force dedicated to providing illegals with their "Voting Manual for Undocumented Migrants".
Abrignac
8 years ago
Let's not tiptoe around the issue in an attempt to muddy the water.

Sure it's NOT a good thing to separate children from their parents. But, it's also not the responsibility of US taxpayers to subsidize housing for people who want a better life. Every year hundres of thousands of people use subterfuge to enter the US. They are encouraged by activists posing as immigration proponents to come and apply for asylum. These so-called activists realize that there is insufficient infrastructure to handle these asylum cases. This results in "indefinite" waits for a court case. They are then used as pawns to show the inhumanity of keeping them detained so "churches" step in as sjw's who resettle these illegals, This allows them to be assimilated into society where they then give birth to anchor babies. It then becomes inhumane to send these newly minted citizens with there families to there home origin of their parents.

Shame on those who try to paint this any other way.

DrafterX
8 years ago
Ya... 😠
Speyside
8 years ago
There is a straight forward answer to this, though I doubt our government would do it or our courts would uphold it. Immediate deportation of anyone who enters our country illegally. There really is no need that I can see for court verdicts for deportation in this circumstance.

Secondly we should eliminate all foreign aid to countries that have significant numbers of their citizens illegally crossing our border. Use this money to cover our costs.

Thirdly eliminate all foreign aid to Mexico. They are culpable in allowing their citizens and others cross their borders and ours. Use this money to cover our costs.

Fourthly eliminate the concept of anchor babies. There should be no citizenship just because they were born here.

Fifthly seize all assets of those who hire illegal aliens. Use the money to cover costs.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
All that sounds good on paper... but the amnesty loophole is what's clogging up the system.
DrafterX
8 years ago
Pull the finger out of the ****... 😟
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
Loophole X, not ...

Oh nevermind.

I mean, Ya 😠
HuckFinn
8 years ago
Lot of misinformation, fear, hate...and sweeping erroneous nonsense in this conversation...
And I get it...kind of..but if it's your wallets your protecting, well..research around..

From:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States 



Research shows that illegal immigrants increase the size of the U.S. economy, contribute to economic growth, enhance the welfare of natives, contribute more in tax revenue than they collect, reduce American firms' incentives to offshore jobs and import foreign-produced goods, and benefit consumers by reducing the prices of goods and services.[8][14][15][16][17] However, there are a number of illegal immigrants that take part in unreported employment. Working tax free, these individuals at able to accept lower wages ultimately driving down the price of unskilled labor. Economists estimate that legalization to illegal immigrant population would increase the immigrants' earnings and consumption considerably, and increase U.S. gross domestic product.[8][18][19][20][21][22]

If it's crime you're sure they bring to the states...


There is no evidence that illegal immigration increases the rate of crime in the United States.[23] There is scholarly consensus that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives.[24][25] Sanctuary cities – which adopt policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being in the country illegally – have no statistically meaningful impact on crime.[26] Research suggests that immigration enforcement has no impact on crime rates.[27][28][26]

Since the Great Recession (December 2007 to June 2009) more undocumented immigrants have left the United States than have entered it, and illegal border crossings are at the lowest levels they have been in decades.

Historically, up till 1924 anyway, we had open borders. Only 1% of immigrants were rejected.
Would you be here if these conditions hadn't existed?
Probably not.

People are fleeing intolerable conditions. Like my grandparents did.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
You must not live in a border state.

Actually, there hasn't been much in the news about crimes by illegals lately here, but that could just be because it doesn't fit the mainstream media narrative so they quit reporting on them.
HuckFinn
8 years ago
Pretty sure Fox would tell us if there was, no?

New York, where I am, ranks 3rd after California and Florida as having the most illegals.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. Are you saying your solution would be just to open the flood gates and let everyone in?
HuckFinn
8 years ago
No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.
Punishing kids, unconscionable.
fiddler898
8 years ago

Nice of you to blur the line.

Abrignac wrote:


‘Twasn’t I who blurred the line, but at least we can agree that we’re still awaiting an answer!
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago

No. But those seeking asylum? Process them.
Fearing immigration is erroneous. And unrealistic.
Punishing kids, unconscionable.

HuckFinn wrote:



So just take every asylum seeker at their word then?

hint: They all claim asylum.
Users browsing this topic