Speyside
8 years ago
Disingenuous, quiddling, pretentious?
frankj1
8 years ago
I was trying to use little words that tail might recognize.
victor809
8 years ago

Dude.
If I want to converse with a liar I'll head down to the car dealership.

You were very pleased with yourself when you said it's OK to lump "religion" into the category of "choice" and therefore it's OK to discriminate.
Then the very obvious slapped you in the face.
Muslim.

You KNOW it's not OK to discriminate against a Muslim.
But isn't that a choice?

So it's obvious to everyone what you meant.
If you think otherwise, then I'll modify it: Obvious to everyone but you.

No mind reading necessary.
But nice misdirection.
Half a point for that.
Otherwise: Fail
Epicly

tailgater wrote:



Perhaps english isn't your first language?

I didn't say it was "ok to lump religion into the category of choice and therefore it's ok to discriminate"...

I said I DO lump religion into the category of choice, but our laws state that we do not discriminate against religion.

You seem to think you got some "gotcha" with muslims..... I consider islam to be a choice... it isn't acceptable to discriminate against them any more than against a christian or a buddhist. I don't necessarily think that's a great law, as I believe ALL religions to be a choice. But that's the law and it must be applied evenly.

I am typing in english, I don't see how this is something you are having trouble understanding.

victor809
8 years ago

You know it. I know it. The whole damn board knows it. I'm not going to waste time digging through old posts here. The search function sucks. But rest assured... if I come across an example, I'll be sure to top it.

MACS wrote:



Dude... you post all the time about how you're so sexually attracted to me that you can't stop touching yourself.

You know it, I know it. The whole damn board knows it. I'm not going to wste time digging through old posts here. The search function sucks. But rest assured.... you definitely post it ALL THE TIME.
Ewok126
8 years ago
Sarah Sanders Huckabee?

I think shes hawt! That double chin, man I bet she could chug a c0ck like nobody's business. It gives me a chubby just thinking about it.

Give that poor woman another triple burger with extra cheese and stop the hate!

The more chins shes got the less space I got to fill when the time comes. As they say, the grand canyon is tight if you pack enough meat into it! 🇨🇮 [jester]
DrMaddVibe
8 years ago

You really don't see the difference, do you?

Wow.
Talk about partisan blindness.


tailgater wrote:




Even when shown the truth he backpedals his tricycle to his safe spot. Fools.
tailgater
8 years ago

Perhaps english isn't your first language?

I didn't say it was "ok to lump religion into the category of choice and therefore it's ok to discriminate"...

I said I DO lump religion into the category of choice, but our laws state that we do not discriminate against religion.

You seem to think you got some "gotcha" with muslims..... I consider islam to be a choice... it isn't acceptable to discriminate against them any more than against a christian or a buddhist. I don't necessarily think that's a great law, as I believe ALL religions to be a choice. But that's the law and it must be applied evenly.

I am typing in english, I don't see how this is something you are having trouble understanding.

victor809 wrote:



Oh.

So you DO it.
But it's not OK.

No habla.

victor809
8 years ago
If you don't understand the statement, perhaps you should use the non-english speaking cbid discussion forum....


It's gonna be on the other side of that wall over there....
JadeRose
8 years ago
Her eyes are too close together and one wanders a bit. She shouldn't be out in public anyway. No one should have to look at that.



and Drafter is ugly, too.
DrafterX
8 years ago
that's how TW described you... 😟
victor809
8 years ago
Jade... Don't stoop to the same level we see from conservative critics regarding women.

Her skill as a press secretary has nothing to do with her looks. We shouldn't judge her looks. We don't make the same comments about the ancient decrepit men who are on both sides of the aisle.

Criticisms of her should focus on the horrendous damage she has done to the credibility of the office and the press briefings, and her gaslighting of the American people.
JadeRose
8 years ago
Ugly has nothing to do with sex. Drafter is ugly, too. No one wants to see that either. Just trying to keep America aesthetically pleasing.
tailgater
8 years ago

Jade... Don't stoop to the same level we see from conservative critics regarding women.

Her skill as a press secretary has nothing to do with her looks. We shouldn't judge her looks. We don't make the same comments about the ancient decrepit men who are on both sides of the aisle.

Criticisms of her should focus on the horrendous damage she has done to the credibility of the office and the press briefings, and her gaslighting of the American people.

victor809 wrote:



So that's why you never mocked Trumps appearance...


Consistency is key.
You seem to have a new calling card every day.

And let's face it.
Her eyes scare the hell outta me.


DrafterX
8 years ago
She's give Fred Sanford alot to talk about... 😟
tailgater
8 years ago
Mmmm.
Cookies.

victor809
8 years ago
I call him the orange moron.
I've probably made fun of his hair.
I believe I also pointed out he was probably a lot fatter than his Dr claimed.

I admit I occasionally make fun of a politicians looks... I laughed when people pointed out mcconnel looks like a turtle.

But I specifically don't do it to female politicians because we have too many years of history of valuing women solely by their looks. Falling back on appearance when criticizing female politicians is a cheap and easy attack and shows a lack of creativity.

We don't care if a male politician is attractive (even if we mock his orangeness or vanity weave of hair)... But people like to post about how attractive their sides female talking heads are compared to the other side... Or how attractive their sides female congresspeople are compared to the other side. Which means they are still valuing female appearance for a job which does not require men to be attractive.

Society has a double standard in place. That will lead to inconsistencies. When people stop pretending a female politician's appearance is somehow relevant then I'll probably stop criticizing people for being lazy and falling back on that attack.
JadeRose
8 years ago
Jesus, Vic. Settle down. Did you forget where you are? I give no **** about her looks. She's a turd that should be flushed like the rest of her ilk. I was just looking for an excuse to abuse Drafter.


Trust me, I'm equal opportunity in my dislike of political figures.
JadeRose
8 years ago
I edited my original post to make you happy and be inclusive.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

Jade... Don't stoop to the same level we see from conservative critics regarding women.

Her skill as a press secretary has nothing to do with her looks. We shouldn't judge her looks. We don't make the same comments about the ancient decrepit men who are on both sides of the aisle.

Criticisms of her should focus on the horrendous damage she has done to the credibility of the office and the press briefings, and her gaslighting of the American people.

victor809 wrote:




Vic, she's just a regurgitater with a big mortgage.
She's "just following orders"

Personally, I feel bad for her. What a horrible gig.


victor809
8 years ago
Just following orders... Nothing good ever was explained with "just following orders"...

I don't feel bad for her. She can leave the job at any time.
Users browsing this topic