Sigh...
Of course. But that's an intentionally misleading question.
Two fiscally separate groups contributing to a shared space will both be impacted if either party pulled out. That doesn't mean they're funding each other.
victor809 wrote:
That's precisely what it means.
Your college roommate's parents weren't funding your kitchen use simply because they paid his half of the rent.
victor809 wrote:
Actually, they are funding my kitchen. Because I can't afford the kitchen without them. I can only live there with them paying half.
Let's put this in terms you might understand.
You have a barrel with 10 gallons of pure water.
I jokingly add an ounce of concentrated urine I found in TW's cupboard.
You get angry, so I remove an ounce from the barrel.
Do you now have 1,280 ounces of pure water again?
The two things are not separate.
Even if all of the baby-killing operational fees are kept separate, there is overlap in the administration costs. Planned parenthood would need LESS overhead without their death factory operation. Heck, I'd say they could operate with a skeleton crew, but that's a dark pun and in reality no government agency is that savvy.
This is not my fight.
I don't want back ally abortions. Ever.
But I hate it when people lie about the funding. Or when they don't understand but will embrace the party line anyway.
Truth be told and aborted baby might cost us less in the long run.
But we'll never know.
Maybe that aborted baby was the next Einstein. Or Victor6969. Or Trump.
