You gotta teach him the faith so that when he comes due for the confirmation the Bishop can bless him.
They want the kid to answer all this gay philosophical bull. Basically it's one of those "do exactly what we tell you and you'll pass" follow authority type things. Probably the worst part about faith formation is that these teachers don't want the kids to form their own opinions they just want to spoon feed them this faith based crap instead of teaching them real history. Catholics don't have it easy, there's really 2000 years of active history, councils, heresies et cetera.
Half the time the Roman Church was fighting off the Arian contraversy which enveloped all of Europe and almost stamped out the Roman Tradition within the first 500 years of the Church. Byzantium at the time had an emperor who was also very much anti-rome so there was a schism between east and west. Constantinople had an ugly history of installing patriarchs that fell in line with the byzantine emperor's agenda mainly because those positions were filled by imperial edict. That's the main reason that the Schism in 1054 happened. Rome finally had enough of the Byzantine Emperors. It had far less to do with actual doctrine and more to do with who had authority of the Roman Church, the emperor, or the Roman Pope. By that time the Holy Roman Empire took shape and the Pope finally had the muscle to leave the union with Constantinople.
It's chit like that the kids find interesting not generic bible quotes and some half-assed emasculated saints. I mean the first day we taught they gave the kids a big excersise on relativism but how the hell do they expect kids to defend themselves against differing opinions and doctrines if they don't even know what they're defending?
jjanecka wrote: