Sef650
7 years ago

Would switching to an infrastructure building plan from a wall building plan be an acceptable compromise?

Both parties agree that our bridges, highways and dams are in serious need of repair. A comprehensive plan could be less expensive than the wall, employ hundreds of thousands of Americans and boost the economy...

delta1 wrote:




That makes waaaaaaaay to much sense.

Guys, this guy is going to ruin the internet with this level-headed, sensible discourse crap. We gotta build a wall to keep him off the internet! He's a threat to our way of life!!!
frankj1
7 years ago

It is not liberal or conservative, but as long as Trump wants border security it will not be favored by liberals. There are ample examples of democrats advocating the wall in years past. Clearly they do not care about the USA, just opposing Trump and the republicans are not better. . IMO, both parties want the free flow of cheap labor and the further benefit that comes with a flood of cheap labor, lower wages for all. In the last few years they both promised security after amnesty and other goodies, but never followed thru on security. I'll probably never forgive Lindsey Graham for calling anyone that opposed his and GWB's proposal for border security after amnesty BS. Clearly neither party has any moral high ground and I cheerfully invite them to go to hell.

Gene363 wrote:


everyone wants border security. Everyone...not worth debating. just like morality, the cons gotta quit trying to own it. It becomes problematic.

very few want a stupid wall when we already know where the problems are and the best methods to combat them.
Trump reneged on a deal with Shumer for border security because it didn't play well with the right wingnuts on radio and because he is painfully aware of da numbahs.

It's a Trump Trophy. not a vital piece of security, and it has tied up everything. You cons need to tell him what's real and let's get back to business...and the sensible security of our great nation
delta1
  • delta1
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago
yah...but it's not cons in general...it's the extreme far right cons, whose numbers have grown since Trump's erection...

why not compromise with intrastructure projects at places where existing barriers have been penetrated, buttressing identified high risk areas?
Users browsing this topic