I have finally completed all 3 of my blind reviews. It was fun and also helped me to understand how my tastes have changed over the past year pretty dramatically except for in one aspect which you will see in my reviews.
Cigar #1
6x48ish dark brown wrapper with a couple veins and slightly toothy appearance. Dark chocolate prelight aroma.
1/3 First dominant note I get is of bitter chocolate with a touch of pepper and maybe some nutmeg. My mouth is getting a little dry which makes me think of nutmeg some. Earthy pepper picks up a bit and the finish is much like a charred steak right off the grill. Ash was a marble white and black, a little flaky and I knocked off the ash about a 1/2 inch in. Burn line is straight and the cigar is producing a good amount of smoke.
2/3 Pepper turns to spicy cayenne with the bitter chocolate still in the forefront and a dry leather finish. The body of the smoke is not heavy, it is actually rather thin but still a lot of it, kind of reminds me of the old LP9s or T52s how the smoke is just pouring from the end of the cigar as well.
3/3 A heavy dose of pepper starts it off but it fades quickly. Leather and earthy tones are prominent now. I'd call this cigar a med/full on the verge of just full. Had to touch it up once here to catch up a wonky burn line. Finishes much the way it started.
Almost 2 hours of smoke time (I smoke pretty slow) and I much enjoyed this cigar. I would guess this to be the high end of the three because it was the most complex by far of the three. My guess, even though I have never smoked one would be something like a Last Call Maduro because it taste much like the naturals but with that connecticut broadleaf added flavor to it.
Cigar #2
This cigar looks much like a connie to me. I haven't had a connie in probably 5 years because I don't care for them but my interest are peaked because lately I have noticed that I reach for cc more often than not. My taste preference has moved from the nc powerhouses it seems. THis one has me curious if I will enjoy a connie now or still not.
6x52ish with a soft box press. Seems are hardly noticeable and it feels smooth as silk. No prelight taste or aroma.
1/3 Starts off just like I had remembered a connie to taste. Burnt ash and a vegetal dry quality to it. I am in hopes of this turning for the better as it burns deeper in. Start to get a minty note now with a slight spiciness to it. The burn line is perfect on this cigar and the ash is an off white color. The cigar produces plenty of smoke that I would call mild and leaves my mouth really dry. A touch of black pepper enters the mix but still has the connie taste to it. Knock the ash off 1" in even though it was holding tight.
2/3 Getting a bitter dry tobacco taste now, almost like that taste you get when putting your tongue on the end of a battery. Switches back to that burnt ash taste and still a very dry smoke. At this point I am more than half way through the cigar and as much as I want to finish for the review I am just not enjoying the experience enough.
I would guess this to be the low end cigar. As much as I didn't enjoy this cigar I can't really say it was because of the cigar but probably more so because of my taste preferences. To me a connie taste like a marlboro on steroids and I appreciate the opportunity to try one after all these years and right when my taste preferences where changing to the milder side. However, I still just don't enjoy connies at all. (Guess I shouldn't assume it a connie yet though since I could be wrong here still).
Cigar #3
5x50 classic robusto size with a lighter side of maduro color wrapper. Pick up one blemish in the wrapper but can't tell if it is from transportation or quality control. Couple veins showing and just slightly toothy. No distinct prelight taste or aroma.
1/3 Starts off earthy with a dark rich chocolate flavor. Just a enough black pepper on the finish to keep me enticed as well. Maybe a leather note mixed in there as well. The ash is tight, white and grey marbled. Straight burn line as well with plenty of smoke. The smoke is thicker than cigar #1. Pepper dissipates and that rich chocolate note takes over.
2/3 Enters the same as the first, rich chocolate note is dominant still. It is kind of a one dimensional cigar so far but I am enjoying that dimension.
3/3 No changes to the cigar to note of. The retro produces a little pepper but overall the cigar is a chocolate bomb and never transitions into other dimensions for me. Some don't like that butif the flavor is right which this one is for me I enjoy it.
Smoking time was 1 hour 20 minutes, I would guess this cigar as the mid range because #1 was more complex. I think I would probably be more interested in stocking this cigar though as it fit my preference better. I would almost guess this to be a Padron but it wasn't box pressed so that eliminates them,
Thanks Phil for the cigars to review. I know that the review for #2 sounds pretty bad but I honestly was most intrigued by that cigar because of my changes in preference lately. Also am very curious to know what each one was because I am not sure I have had any of them before.