not specifically Constitutionally barred, but it's a policy of the DOJ that seems to hold sway here, interpreting the Constitution's checks and balances with the objective to protect the POTUS from frivolous indictments that could tie up the executive branch...
he described each of their activities in the Mueller report, including contacts and meetings and lies about contacts and meetings with Russians, but concluded that there was insufficient evidence that they engaged in a criminal conspiracy...Mueller concluded that Trump's campaign members were aware that Russian government operatives were engaging in activities to interfere with the election, they were aware that the Russians wanted to help Trump win and cause Hillary to lose...
Mueller's Report concluded that Trump's campaign encouraged the Russians ("Russia, if you're listening") and wanted to work with them (if it's what you say it is, I love it) but their activities in furtherance of that objective didn't rise to the level of sufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy.
delta1 wrote:
