victor809
7 years ago

If I am reading things correctly, the first $5.3M of inheritance is currently exempt from federal tax today.

I'm not pushing for an inheritance tax increase, but if one were to occur while preserving such an exemption (along with the farm/factory type exemption I suggest above)....well increasing tax on amounts over $5.3M might be palatable....and protect folks like you and your family, cpf.

dstieger wrote:



I believe you are correct, that the first 5MM is untaxed.

I don't care one way or another about inheritance taxes personally. Maybe if I were in line to inherit 6MM I'd be pissed that the government wanted to take 400k of it or whatever the number is.... But as it stands, I'm not too riled up if the rich keep their wealth.

I do find it hilarious and sad how the republicans sell it as a tax on the common man. Idiots with less than 100k in assets to their name seem to believe the inheritance tax in any way applies to them.... A beautiful piece of salesmanship. I can't believe the suckers fell for it.
delta1
7 years ago
more salesmanship: our programs provide the American middle class and the American poor with access and opportunity...
DrafterX
7 years ago
100k..?? Hell if you own a home you're most likely worth more than that.... 😟
victor809
7 years ago

100k..?? Hell if you own a home you're most likely worth more than that.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



What's your point?
over 30% of americans don't own homes. Of the 64% that do own homes, how many do you think have over 50k in equity in them? I can tell you, the average american homeowner has $113k in equity in their home. That means there are a lot of people with significantly less than $113k.
DrafterX
7 years ago
True.. but are they Republicans... thats who you were calling idiots correct... 😟
victor809
7 years ago

True.. but are they Republicans... thats who you were calling idiots correct... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Yes.

Why? Do you have some myth in your head that republicans actually have more assets?
frankj1
7 years ago
net worth would add the value of the home (along with stuff like savings, 401k, car value etc.) but subtract what is owed.

a quick look showed that the Average American household numbers look way better than the median...690K vs 97K.
I believe these numbers were from 2016.
victor809
7 years ago

net worth would add the value of the home (along with stuff like savings, 401k, car value etc.) but subtract what is owed.

a quick look showed that the Average American household numbers look way better than the median...690K vs 97K.
I believe these numbers were from 2016.

frankj1 wrote:



Oooooffff that's a disparity and a half.

That's a real interesting couple numbers to include in a post on income inequality. To get that sort of disparity across 350MM people, you have to have some insane top level numbers.
frankj1
7 years ago

Oooooffff that's a disparity and a half.

That's a real interesting couple numbers to include in a post on income inequality. To get that sort of disparity across 350MM people, you have to have some insane top level numbers.

victor809 wrote:


and some pitiful bottom numbers as well.
victor809
7 years ago

and some pitiful bottom numbers as well.

frankj1 wrote:



Yeah, but literally the difference between the absolute bottom and the median is only 100k. There's really not much wiggle room there at all... and 100k is not a lot of money (says something that 1/2 of our nation's population has less in assets than a nice tesla)
victor809
7 years ago
I think this could be an interesting time.
I've seen some hints of it... people selling "eat the rich" t-shirts... the ridiculous demands to have student debt wiped out....

The poor are getting very restless. And the actual rich (not "I'm a republican so I must be wealthy" aspirational rich.... like the literal top 0.5% asset-holders....) are really accumulating wealth.

We may be fortunate enough to see a revolution.
frankj1
7 years ago

Yeah, but literally the difference between the absolute bottom and the median is only 100k. There's really not much wiggle room there at all... and 100k is not a lot of money (says something that 1/2 of our nation's population has less in assets than a nice tesla)

victor809 wrote:


all true
tailgater
7 years ago

I think this could be an interesting time.
I've seen some hints of it... people selling "eat the rich" t-shirts... the ridiculous demands to have student debt wiped out....

The poor are getting very restless. And the actual rich (not "I'm a republican so I must be wealthy" aspirational rich.... like the literal top 0.5% asset-holders....) are really accumulating wealth.

We may be fortunate enough to see a revolution.

victor809 wrote:



Not likely.

the Millennials? Gen Z?

We're talking about a generation and a half who were physically crippled by the results of a free election.

Revolution?

LOL!



Although it would be kinda cool.









DrafterX
7 years ago
Things sure change in a hurry... here i thought only rich old white guys were Republicans.... 😟
delta1
7 years ago
I've met you...and you are not old...

if you were rich, you hid it well...

so you must be one of the peeps the old rich white guys are fooling....
victor809
7 years ago
Have you watched a trump rally? No one is accusing those people of being wealthy... Or of knowing what a dentist is...
teedubbya
7 years ago
Underestimate our future generations at your own peril.
Users browsing this topic