teedubbya
7 years ago
You want proof of trump misdeeds but not Clinton’s. You claim trump paid and paid off a sex worker instead of the crap Clinton apparently did and yet ignore trumps own words about what he did and the claims against him. Interesting how your Christianity provides cover for one and not the other when it should provide cover for neither. If trump wasn’t an R at the moment there is no way you would support his **** let alone using Jesus to do it.
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago

I will, it is interesting that you are so insecure that you have the need to poke the Trump haters, and think the op is funny. I do not need poke at Trump supporters and do not think it is funny to do so. Though I do enjoy arguing with Trump supporters and point out the cowardly orange lions multitude of flaws, and that he has no heart.

Speyside wrote:



Your insults make me laugh. 😂
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago

You want proof of trump misdeeds but not Clinton’s. You claim trump paid and paid off a sex worker instead of the crap Clinton apparently did and yet ignore trumps own words about what he did and the claims against him. Interesting how your Christianity provides cover for one and not the other when it should provide cover for neither. If trump wasn’t an R at the moment there is no way you would support his **** let alone using Jesus to do it.

teedubbya wrote:



There is ample proof of Clinton skullduggery and as I said:

...that Clinton apprently did, we really do not know...



I'm not how much more clear it could be.


I guess the mention of Christianity make some people nervous, but I clearly did not excuse Trump, I drew a comparison between what we know a Whitehouse intern said she did with Clinton and what Stormy Daniels said she did with Trump. I'm not talking about the other allegations, the s**t flys on both sides.

Trump is Trump, if you believe in Christianity there was only one perfect man in this world and he died on a cross, all others are flawed, some much more than others. IMO, you don't have to be a Christian to know that all people have flaws.



I could change it to:

Clinton is Clinton and Trump is Trump, if you believe in Christianity there was only one perfect man in this world and he died on a cross, all others are flawed, some much more than others. IMO, you don't have to be a Christian to know that all people have flaws, some are worse than others, there is quite a range.



The meaning is no different, all men are flawed, neither Clinton nor Trump is any different.
teedubbya
7 years ago
If you think mention of Christianity makes me nervous that is laughable but I suspect you were not referencing me. I just don’t like when it’s used inappropriately.

I did misread your post a bit but your clarification didn’t change anything. There is plenty of substantiated allegations on both combined with plenty of unsubstantiated smoke. Funny you would find one somehow more palatable than the other and mix your religion in to the reasoning. The politics are the only substantive difference. I hate Clinton, and may hate Trump worse only because he is destroying the integrity of my party. At a minimum they are equally disturbing, but in all honesty I find Trump worse when looking through the filter of my morals and values. Combine that with Clinton not being relevant to today and Trumps crap being contemporary and it’s an easy choice to me. Both bad. One currently relevant. Some using one to provide cover for the other.

All men are flawed. True. Some more than others. True. But that provides no cover for who should be leading our country and no relief for continuing to support it. I’d support trumps efforts to not run again, apologize and ask for forgiveness (not to me). If he seriously felt bad and wanted to make amends for his sins that would be one thing. He makes no apologies and uses the lance Armstrong scorched earth defense thus compounding and continuing things.

Same goes for Clinton, but again he’s no longer relevant nor someone I do or ever did support.

Meh. Gene I know you and I are alike in that we say what we think and it won’t get under either of our skins. I just don’t like my religion or my party used to continue to support this abomination or the hypocracy to try to use another scumbag for cover or justification.
Speyside
7 years ago
Not an insult Gene, a statement of the obvious. You just don't see it that way. You don't make me laugh, I find you disappointing to say the least.
delta1
7 years ago
Maria Shriver and Barbara Walters on the list...didn't know they were into young teen girls...is it possible some on the list went on Epstein's island on invitation, without knowledge of the sex crimes going on?


I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that all the Trump supporters now, those using all kinds of mental gymnastics to provide a rationale for their presence on his bandwagon, offering their support...who would be outraged if a lib behaved and spoke like Trump and made decisions like this as POTUS.......will wake up one day and wonder what the hell happened...[frypan]
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago

If you think mention of Christianity makes me nervous that is laughable but I suspect you were not referencing me. I just don’t like when it’s used inappropriately.

I did misread your post a bit but your clarification didn’t change anything. There is plenty of substantiated allegations on both combined with plenty of unsubstantiated smoke. Funny you would find one somehow more palatable than the other and mix your religion in to the reasoning. The politics are the only substantive difference. I hate Clinton, and may hate Trump worse only because he is destroying the integrity of my party. At a minimum they are equally disturbing, but in all honesty I find Trump worse when looking through the filter of my morals and values. Combine that with Clinton not being relevant to today and Trumps crap being contemporary and it’s an easy choice to me. Both bad. One currently relevant. Some using one to provide cover for the other.

All men are flawed. True. Some more than others. True. But that provides no cover for who should be leading our country and no relief for continuing to support it. I’d support trumps efforts to not run again, apologize and ask for forgiveness (not to me). If he seriously felt bad and wanted to make amends for his sins that would be one thing. He makes no apologies and uses the lance Armstrong scorched earth defense thus compounding and continuing things.

Same goes for Clinton, but again he’s no longer relevant nor someone I do or ever did support.

Meh. Gene I know you and I are alike in that we say what we think and it won’t get under either of our skins. I just don’t like my religion or my party used to continue to support this abomination or the hypocracy to try to use another scumbag for cover or justification.

teedubbya wrote:



I'm good.

I understand, and while I'm no longer a supporter of the republican party and never could stand the democrats I can see your point. From my POV, 99% of all politicians are no better or worse then Trump.

I did not intend to justify anything, actual or supposed, that Trump did by the reference Christianity, just that one man was perfect all others flawed. Judgement is up to us and the most despicable human being can ask for salvation and if they are sincere, you'll meet them in heaven.
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago

Not an insult Gene, a statement of the obvious. You just don't see it that way. You don't make me laugh, I find you disappointing to say the least.

Speyside wrote:



Well, I guess we'll just have to live with that.
teedubbya
7 years ago
Gene good here too.

I agree about judgement and the afterlife. Not so much on electing leaders.
Speyside
7 years ago
So I've basically been goofing all day. What I really think is this. It has been a long time since a president hasn't done something that he should have been impeached for. Some were better at keeping those actions secret than others were. At the end of the day history will show who was or was not an outstanding president. Maybe Trump is good for the country because he is shaking old school politics every day. What I think of him is irrelevant. It's a good thing to scare the Republican and Democratic machines down to their very core, maybe there is a miniscule chance that they remember that they work for us, not special interests. It doesn't really matter if you are conservative or liberal. What does really matter is we are Americans. Clinton didn't destroy us, neither will Trump. Laugh a little more, it is good for the soul.
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
7 years ago

So I've basically been goofing all day. What I really think is this. It has been a long time since a president hasn't done something that he should have been impeached for. Some were better at keeping those actions secret than others were. At the end of the day history will show who was or was not an outstanding president. Maybe Trump is good for the country because he is shaking old school politics every day. What I think of him is irrelevant. It's a good thing to scare the Republican and Democratic machines down to their very core, maybe there is a miniscule chance that they remember that they work for us, not special interests. It doesn't really matter if you are conservative or liberal. What does really matter is we are Americans. Clinton didn't destroy us, neither will Trump. Laugh a little more, it is good for the soul.

Speyside wrote:



Agreed, though as much as I LOVE the highlighted part, I am not so optimistic they will change. In my dreams he scares them all to death and you start impeach proceedings, but only after the hero parade.
Speyside
7 years ago
Gene, I think there is an ice cubes chance in hell they will change. Even though I hate Trump, I think it is great that he rattles their collective cage on an almost daily basis.
Users browsing this topic