for #59
Spey, yet she has committed a crime...


I've stated before and met some opposition, but I'd like to see some real consequences for owners of legal guns who have them stolen and don't report them, and lesser penalties for those that do report the theft, including denying permits to own again.

Talk show host (female) on local radio said she could have bought a gun instantly at a show in New Hampshire. That should be stopped.

Couple of other situations I'd be for changing, but other than that I do believe people are allowed to own per the Constitution. I'm just not sure it's a case of anything goes.

frankj1 wrote:

Folks that break the law need to be held accountable. All of them. I've no problem with that. I'm not familiar with the laws in New Hampshire. So that may or may not be true. That is a common "Look what I can get away with at these gun shows!" hysteria driving sensational reporting standard.

Federal law requires an instant check. If the dealer does an online NICS approval and it comes back clean, then absolutely she could have bought the gun onsite. That is a legal purchase in accordance with law. What's the problem? I do that all the time. If she was a felon and could do that, well then there is a problem, but I doubt that is the case.

As far as law abiding citizens go, if you don't commit crimes, what business is it of yours what they own or do not own? Screw that nonsense.

USNGunner wrote:

Right and what would those limitations of speech be from causing?

Harm.

And if you use a firearm illegally the same thing is there.

But now we want to make speech difficult to own, prohibitively difficult to own, only allowed situationally both physically and geographically, and using societal pressure to attempt making speech unpopular. All while claiming to want to protect the people most harmed.

Oh wait.....

ZRX1200 wrote:

I heard in Australia they took all the guns and the dingos ate all da babies... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

I'm dubious when someone isn't on solid legal ground so they attack the periphery hoping to create a hassle or nuisance BECAUSE they are not on solid legal ground. Feel strongly? Attack it directly. Fail? You can try again but don't be an ankle biter.

teedubbya wrote:

I own guns because I want to, I like them, and they are my right as provided by the constitution. No other reason is necessary.

teedubbya wrote:

My current favorite is my scorpion with multiple 30+ round magazines. I'm beginning to believe I can fire close to the speeds I didn't believe when Delta posted them. Sorry Delta, I may have been wrong. (When I am wrong I admit it... it's the fence post in me... eh I mean...oh never mind)

Don't like it? The constitution can be modified. Get enough people and go through the process. Assuming you can not (because you can't), refer to the first two sentences.

merica

Those were not dingos. It was CROS and he was just hungry and stuff.

teedubbya wrote:

Poor CROS... 😞



What's funnier than CROS eatng a dead baby..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote: