if the choice was Donald or Beto...Beto every time....


all candidates say odd stuff that they hope will attract attention and distinguish themselves from their opponents...it was clear he didn't really think his statement through because of how scattered his implementation plan sounded...

all along his intent was to express a sentiment that a large segment of Americans may personally/privately think, if the polls are correct...to get notoriety

delta1 wrote:

https://www.mvtimes.com/2019/10/11/crossing-guard-relieved-duty-guns-seized/

ZRX1200 wrote:

if the choice was Donald or Beto...Beto every time....


all candidates say odd stuff that they hope will attract attention and distinguish themselves from their opponents...it was clear he didn't really think his statement through because of how scattered his implementation plan sounded...

all along his intent was to express a sentiment that a large segment of Americans may personally/privately think, if the polls are correct...to get notoriety

delta1 wrote:

I rarely vote third party, since those candidates never win and in some years siphon off votes from a candidate I support...

it's a little weaselly to say after an election that you didn't vote for the winner, but jump on his bandwagon and say he's greater than sliced bread and back him to the hilt...

I don't mind saying I voted for Hillary, warts and all, especially because I didn't think that Trump was qualified...and he keeps proving my suspicions...

delta1 wrote:

if the choice was Donald or Beto...Beto every time....


all candidates say odd stuff that they hope will attract attention and distinguish themselves from their opponents...it was clear he didn't really think his statement through because of how scattered his implementation plan sounded...

all along his intent was to express a sentiment that a large segment of Americans may personally/privately think, if the polls are correct...to get notoriety

delta1 wrote:

Seems to me - and I'm probably wrong - but it seems to me the only thing keeping a 3rd party candidate from winning is people who keep believing 3rd party candidates can't win...

Wonder which parties are responsible for starting that lie?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

There’s no such thing as “assault weapons”

ZRX1200 wrote:

Seems to me - and I'm probably wrong - but it seems to me the only thing keeping a 3rd party candidate from winning is people who keep believing 3rd party candidates can't win...

Wonder which parties are responsible for starting that lie?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Guess it’s time for a revolution

izonfire wrote:

I concur. A 300 winmag is way more powerful and dangerous than an AR15, but it looks like a sporting rifle... so nobody cares. The AR15 looks scary, so the anti-gun 'tards called it an "assault weapon" to make it sound scary.

This guy sums it up succinctly:

MACS wrote:

Wonder which parties are responsible for starting that lie?

opelmanta1900 wrote:

The same parties that make a concerted effort to keep third party candidates off of ballots and out of debates.

borndead1 wrote: