Whistlebritches
6 years ago

makes me want to tax the corporations that knowingly entice them here and employ them!

frankj1 wrote:




Ditto ………..This IMO is the beginning of the end and the return of living wages.Americans will do this menial labor if paid appropriate wages.It's time to hold these demons accountable......let's start at $25K per illegal employee and double it every subsequent offense.
frankj1
6 years ago

Ditto ………..This IMO is the beginning of the end and the return of living wages.Americans will do this menial labor if paid appropriate wages.It's time to hold these demons accountable......let's start at $25K per illegal employee and double it every subsequent offense.

Whistlebritches wrote:


you're a beautiful man...but somehow I don't think this was DMV's reason for that link!
It just seemed so obvious after reading it though.
tailgater
6 years ago
A. people here illegally should be forced to leave.
B. Laws should be enforced.
3. a drivers license is a legal form of ID for most situations. To suggest that people in the country by illegal methods should be allowed to have one is ridiculous.
D. People here illegally should be forced to leave.

It's not rocket surgery folks.

Laws.
Responsibility.

Shirking either takes a loser mentality.






ZRX1200
6 years ago
As an Oregon resident, my current driver’s license will no longer be accepted as ID on flights. This is thanks to liberal dipsheet policies for north of the Roseburg line.......

Let me gather my #OUTRAGE! for you Victor. Gimme a min.
frankj1
6 years ago
edit: for #43


how about recruiting and hiring them?
why come here without incentives?
frankj1
6 years ago

As an Oregon resident, my current driver’s license will no longer be accepted as ID on flights. This is thanks to liberal dipsheet policies for north of the Roseburg line.......

Let me gather my #OUTRAGE! for you Victor. Gimme a min.

ZRX1200 wrote:


not sure what they're called, but our new MA drivers licenses are wicked smaht, might even be smaht enough to get us into places like Canada and stuff.
DrMaddVibe
6 years ago

makes me want to tax the corporations that knowingly entice them here and employ them!

frankj1 wrote:



Tax?

Fine them into oblivion. Do not pass go. Go to jail.

But hey maybe some people.have the extra 6500.00...I think that its grossly under counted.

frankj1
6 years ago

Tax?

Fine them into oblivion. Do not pass go. Go to jail.

But hey maybe some people.have the extra 6500.00...I think that its grossly under counted.

DrMaddVibe wrote:


guess I read you wrong on that one!
The late, great radio talk show host Jerry Williams used to say fees, fines, and taxes are all taxes.

we're looking at a catch 22 here. These Captains of Industry who run these mega corps that are basically importing illegals to come here to work on the cheap also have tentacles that reach and even currently reside in the White H.U.T.
Which one of them will step up to lead the campaign to fine themselves?

DrMaddVibe
6 years ago

guess I read you wrong on that one!
The late, great radio talk show host Jerry Williams used to say fees, fines, and taxes are all taxes.

we're looking at a catch 22 here. These Captains of Industry who run these mega corps that are basically importing illegals to come here to work on the cheap also have tentacles that reach and even currently reside in the White H.U.T.
Which one of them will step up to lead the campaign to fine themselves?

frankj1 wrote:



I posted the link because I'm sick and tired of hearing that it doesn't cost anything and we're a great nation anyways that can afford it. EVERYTHING HAS A COST. There's no "free lunch". Someone is ALWAYS paying for it.

If you have proof that a corporation is doing this...turn them in to ICE!

https://www.ice.gov/worksite 
Abrignac
6 years ago

granted our immigration policies are a mess and need major re-writes...

executive fiats to reverse previous decisions and flout our heritage of a powerful nation built by immigrants is not the way accomplish this...it does serve Trump's purposes though...which is to demonize people from other countries and close the doors to only a select few, which appeals to the xenophobes and far right nationalists among us...the Statue of Liberty be damned...

Americans, as a whole, are much more positive about immigration: these American values are at odds with what the Trump administration is doing...

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx 


sample question from the poll: On the whole, do you think immigration is a good thing or a bad thing for this country today?

76% say it is a good thing

delta1 wrote:



https://news.gallup.com/poll/284156/trump-job-approval-personal-best.aspx 

The only poll that matter is taken on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November in even numbered years.
tailgater
6 years ago

edit: for #43


how about recruiting and hiring them?
why come here without incentives?

frankj1 wrote:



Which part of "enforce the laws" did you not understand?
[whip]

I've said all along that I'd prefer a virtual wall. Crack down on companies hiring the illegals.


victor809
6 years ago

A. people here illegally should be forced to leave.
B. Laws should be enforced.
3. a drivers license is a legal form of ID for most situations. To suggest that people in the country by illegal methods should be allowed to have one is ridiculous.
D. People here illegally should be forced to leave.

It's not rocket surgery folks.

Laws.
Responsibility.

Shirking either takes a loser mentality.

tailgater wrote:


This whole thing is nonsense and really shows the insanity of the situation.

People's presence here illegally is mainly the responsibility of the federal government. They are the ones who have the jurisdiction to "build a wall" (haha like that will do anything) or provide the visas which people come in on.

Yet local governments (cities/states) are the ones who must somehow keep their region operating as well as possible regardless of the federal government's success or failure at managing illegal immigration.

Clearly over the years, local governments have realized that they are better off managing the illegal population rather than demonizing them. ie, you're better off with illegal immigrants passing a driver's test and driving with a driver's license than you are having them drive without any training/license because they're afraid of the state government. You're better off issuing them an ID and knowing who they are under any number of situations, than you are letting them just live under the radar.

You want them to leave, talk to the federal government.
Abrignac
6 years ago

This whole thing is nonsense and really shows the insanity of the situation.

People's presence here illegally is mainly the responsibility of the federal government. They are the ones who have the jurisdiction to "build a wall" (haha like that will do anything) or provide the visas which people come in on.

Yet local governments (cities/states) are the ones who must somehow keep their region operating as well as possible regardless of the federal government's success or failure at managing illegal immigration.

Clearly over the years, local governments have realized that they are better off managing the illegal population rather than demonizing them. ie, you're better off with illegal immigrants passing a driver's test and driving with a driver's license than you are having them drive without any training/license because they're afraid of the state government. You're better off issuing them an ID and knowing who they are under any number of situations, than you are letting them just live under the radar.

You want them to leave, talk to the federal government.

victor809 wrote:



Another fine example of a strawman argument.
frankj1
6 years ago

I posted the link because I'm sick and tired of hearing that it doesn't cost anything and we're a great nation anyways that can afford it. EVERYTHING HAS A COST. There's no "free lunch". Someone is ALWAYS paying for it.

If you have proof that a corporation is doing this...turn them in to ICE!

https://www.ice.gov/worksite 

DrMaddVibe wrote:


are there any stats showing how much these illegal workers are paying in federal, state, and local taxes?
we'd need both sides of the tax equation to determine how much (or if) they are costing us...not even factoring what they contribute (spend) to the economy. Though as the laws are currently written, I'd still like to see those doing the hiring paying a price.

But would these jobs get done by our citizens, even for a guaranteed minimum wage? Doubt it. This is not a simple issue.

It wouldn't be possible, but if there was a way to let in x amount for x amount of time from x many countries to do the work Americans refuse to do, we'd get our fruit and veggies at the supermarket and stuff, and our elderly citizens' butts wiped, and all the other unglamorous jobs we are above doing.

It worked reasonably well with visa stuff for restaurant and hotel jobs in seasonal vacation spots, many young adults from Ireland and Bulgaria and other countries that come and go...foreign students and others wanting to see America but needing to work their way across it.
victor809
6 years ago

Another fine example of a strawman argument.

Abrignac wrote:



Not sure you understand the definition of a strawman argument.
Tail claimed that illegals shouldn't be here.
I pointed out it's not the local government's problem and they're just trying to run a city/state. That's not a "strawman" that's literally in response to what he said.
If you believe it's a strawman, then his statement couldn't be relevant to the conversation at hand.
DrafterX
6 years ago
House lawmakers on Thursday passed a bill that would allow illegal immigrants to be eligible for damages from their employer if their labor rights are judged to have been violated -- while rejecting a measure that would prevent unions from recruiting those in the country illegally.

The Democrat-sponsored "Protecting the Right to Organize" (PRO) Act seeks to expand labor protections and boost unions across the board. Like California's controversial Assembly Bill 5, one of the PRO Act's stated purposes is to end worker misclassification and stop employers from denying workers benefits by doing so. It passed in a 224-194 vote, mostly along party lines.

Film at 11... 🤔
jjanecka
6 years ago
In a way that makes it harder to want to hire illegals
Abrignac
6 years ago

Not sure you understand the definition of a strawman argument.
Tail claimed that illegals shouldn't be here.
I pointed out it's not the local government's problem and they're just trying to run a city/state. That's not a "strawman" that's literally in response to what he said.
If you believe it's a strawman, then his statement couldn't be relevant to the conversation at hand.

victor809 wrote:



Exactly. Your solution of looking to the Federal Government to solve this problem isn’t a solution relevant to the problem. Solving this problem REQUIRES a united solution. As long as individual states offer incentives to illegal immigrants a Federal Government solution in IMPOSSIBLE.
teedubbya
6 years ago
We sure pick and choose when supporting States rights.
victor809
6 years ago

Exactly. Your solution of looking to the Federal Government to solve this problem isn’t a solution relevant to the problem. Solving this problem REQUIRES a united solution. As long as individual states offer incentives to illegal immigrants a Federal Government solution in IMPOSSIBLE.

Abrignac wrote:



How does that make my argument a "strawman"?

"A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent"

I addressed tail's actual argument, that "we should get rid of all illegals" by pointing out that wasn't a local government's responsibility really.
Users browsing this topic