tonygraz
5 years ago
BGZ - you gotta get that script fixed or you will end up reading the idiotic crap the moron comes up with.
Smooth light
5 years ago
Your just another incomplete pass.

The truth is hard to swallow, especially with someone of vast intelligence like you.

You can run but you can't hide, just answer the question.

Dirt ball!
Dg west deptford
5 years ago
Hey pinky,
How are ya?
I was baiting another fish so I'll switch bait

Rather than use physical evidence to show that the Bible is most probably true, we again go back to intellectual evidence, & logical proof, to show that the Bible is necessarily true. We can know that the Bible is true because it claims to be true& proves it by the impossibility of the contrary!
It is only because the Bible is true that we have justification for universal, immaterial, unchanging laws. It is only by God’s revealing Himself to us through His word that we have grounds for rational thought. We use rational thought, therefore we can know that the Bible is true. Attempting to use logic to try to disprove the only possible source for logic would be self-refuting.
Shalom
Smooth light
5 years ago
Logic is the revelation of the supernatural, not the understanding of experience.

The Bible,he gave to us as the maker's "owners manual." But most just put it aside to collect dust.

Psalm 16:11

frankj1
5 years ago
Hey, how 'bout that John Kerry, huh?
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
5 years ago

Hey pinky,
How are ya?
I was baiting another fish so I'll switch bait

Rather than use physical evidence to show that the Bible is most probably true, we again go back to intellectual evidence, & logical proof, to show that the Bible is necessarily true. We can know that the Bible is true because it claims to be true& proves it by the impossibility of the contrary!
It is only because the Bible is true that we have justification for universal, immaterial, unchanging laws. It is only by God’s revealing Himself to us through His word that we have grounds for rational thought. We use rational thought, therefore we can know that the Bible is true. Attempting to use logic to try to disprove the only possible source for logic would be self-refuting.
Shalom

Dg west deptford wrote:



I have seen no evidence that the bible is true. I concede that the stories within it are probably based on lore, that was previously based on eye witness testimony from people with PTSD (everyone had PTSD back then). You claim it's necessarily true, but it has to be that way for you for any of the rest of it to make any sense.

I provide a counter claim to your assertation. I'm going to claim that the Bible is mostly false, and I'm going to do it by logic.

Step one, people back then didn't know sh*t.... this is a true statement, it's a true statement for today as well, but vastly more so for people back then.

Step two... if people back then didn't know sh*t, thought the world was flat, thought the star patterns they saw in the sky were gods because they were trippin' on the local shrooms. Oh, and they passed up some oral tradition about some dude named Abraham that took his kid up a mountain or something... dude would be locked up and considered bat sh*t crazy today... but you can believe in a book that can ultimately be summed up to that one event.

Seriously, that's all you need.

You mentioned our universal laws only exist because the Bible (seriously, go back and read what you wrote, that's what you said). That's just a bad statement that doesn't need retort because it's clearly false.

You claim I only have rational thought because of god... I claim it's because my ancestors needed to eat.

You claim the bible is a source of logic. It's not... not even close, not even a little bit. In fact, it's kind of the antithesis to logic.

Almost everything you said is simply false.
Smooth light
5 years ago
We can say that about your brain farts too,(or just old talking points), just to be nice.

Obviously you don't learn from past and build on them,or just repeat them.

You still can't get past your own ego.


But we still love you and pray for you. Someday you'll see the light in the dark.

tailgater
5 years ago
This thread has gone exactly as I suspected it would...
RayR
5 years ago
Benny is back to his old dead people didn't know chit routine.💤
rfenst
5 years ago

Hey pinky,
How are ya?
I was baiting another fish so I'll switch bait

Rather than use physical evidence to show that the Bible is most probably true, we again go back to intellectual evidence, & logical proof, to show that the Bible is necessarily true. We can know that the Bible is true because it claims to be true& proves it by the impossibility of the contrary!
It is only because the Bible is true that we have justification for universal, immaterial, unchanging laws. It is only by God’s revealing Himself to us through His word that we have grounds for rational thought. We use rational thought, therefore we can know that the Bible is true. Attempting to use logic to try to disprove the only possible source for logic would be self-refuting.
Shalom

Dg west deptford wrote:


Self-authenticating truths for universal, immaterial and unchanging laws as well as for logic and rational thoughts appears to be dangerous in the wrong hands.

Dg west deptford
5 years ago
Oh pinky, I was hoping we could advance since we already been over the issue of truth, knowledge, universal laws and logic.
You denied all of them. I'm sure you can go back and review.

But ok maybe you've changed your worldview & now believe in truth, knowledge, universal law & logic. So where do you get these without God?

What is your ultimate authority? Most ‘unbelievers’ have never given this question much thought but the answer is often: “My own human reason.” My question then is: “By what authority do you use human reason as your ultimate authority? “Um…my human reason?” This logic is entirely circular!
Again we've already been over this but by your (previously professed) worldview you could be wrong about everything you think you know.
You could be in the MaTrIX

Oh & the oldest book in the bible Job goes into great scientific detail that took many many generations to figure out - like around a round earth for your wrong example
frankj1
5 years ago

This thread has gone exactly as I suspected it would...

tailgater wrote:





Frankie Tripod wrote in #45:
Hey, how 'bout that John Kerry, huh?


tried. failed.
DrMaddVibe
5 years ago
If you buy what JOhnKErry is selling...I have zero respect for you.

You've been hoodwinked, bamboozled and tricked but you weren't too smart to begin with.

Greta, John and Manbearpig can suck it sideways. Pushing their narrative makes you as weak as them!
frankj1
5 years ago
who in the world are you talking to?

If my post #52, I can't understand how you missed me just helping my friend tail regain control of his thread.

Smooth light
5 years ago
John Kerry ... If you get your news from propaganda news networks, you don't have a clue, they won't cover it. It doesn't fit their narrative.

There are all colluders of subversion, and insurrection,(nuthing to see here).
RobertHively
5 years ago

who in the world are you talking to?

If my post #52, I can't understand how you missed me just helping my friend tail regain control of his thread.

frankj1 wrote:



It's like you told me a long time ago, you get a few real replies, maybe an argument or two and then it usually goes downhill after that. Maybe a few jokes and a "did you find CROS".

Nice of you to try and get it back on track though.

Have a good one Frankie T






DrafterX
5 years ago
Poor CROS... 😞
teedubbya
5 years ago
Drafter could go fir some hot CROS buns about now.
frankj1
5 years ago

It's like you told me a long time ago, you get a few real replies, maybe an argument or two and then it usually goes downhill after that. Maybe a few jokes and a "did you find CROS".

Nice of you to try and get it back on track though.

Have a good one Frankie T






RobertHively wrote:


and you listened to me...?
apparently I gave you too much credit for character judgement!

glad you stuck around regardless...HA!
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
5 years ago

Oh pinky, I was hoping we could advance since we already been over the issue of truth, knowledge, universal laws and logic.
You denied all of them. I'm sure you can go back and review.

But ok maybe you've changed your worldview & now believe in truth, knowledge, universal law & logic. So where do you get these without God?

What is your ultimate authority? Most ‘unbelievers’ have never given this question much thought but the answer is often: “My own human reason.” My question then is: “By what authority do you use human reason as your ultimate authority? “Um…my human reason?” This logic is entirely circular!
Again we've already been over this but by your (previously professed) worldview you could be wrong about everything you think you know.
You could be in the MaTrIX

Oh & the oldest book in the bible Job goes into great scientific detail that took many many generations to figure out - like around a round earth for your wrong example

Dg west deptford wrote:



Got math?

Let's see, where do I get my reason from... from being lucky enough to be a part of the species happens to be the greatest predator on Earth... Where that come from... oh crap, probably ancestors having to figure out a way to kick the lions azzes (the lions have been getting their azzes kicked ever since). Then from all the way down the line from way back when... when the first little rodent looking thing emerged... that if you go back further, probably some single celled organism in a heat vent in the ocean... Hell, good question... but what I do believe, is that my ability to reason is an emergent phenomenon. Nothing to do with a deity. Not sure how that's circular.

Pretty sure we're not in the matrix... but if we are, would that make the creators god?

My wrong example of what? People back then believing the world is flat? People STILL believe the Earth is flat, are you saying you think there were less of them back then? Thought you believed in logic.

As far as me saying I could be wrong about everything I think I know... where did you get that from? I think you pulled that one out your azz. Because I never proclaimed to know the the things you're interested in.

I don't know if there's a god, don't care if there's one or not. I am pretty sure that if one exists, it didn't make us in it's image or gives a sh*t about us in the slightest... I believe the people that put labels on things would label me an atheist of the agnostic variety.

And the other thing you care about... oh, that's probably the only thing that you care about. In your mind "knowing" that you are going to be saved and go to heaven because you're a good person. You might be of the Evangelical variety where all you have to do is accept Jesus... I think that one's the most popular with people with a past. You seem more like a "saved" type, I didn't go back and look up our old chats... it's more fun to refresh raw.

Also, there's no science in there. Show me where it teaches you relativity, or explains what a fermion is. What page does it discuss the inverse square law? Or the laws of thermodynamics? What page does it go over evolution... oops, didn't mean to spit that one out. You see where I'm going with this (hopefully).

With all that said, you do you! I'll argue with you on it, because it's the politics forum and that's what we do in the politics forum... But I don't really care if you're a believer or not. I'm just arguing with you about it because you're on the politics forum, and again, that's what we do on the cbid politics forum.

Also, not sure how this thread got turned into a religious argument. Not sure why you care what I think on the topic, not like we're going to change each other's mind or anything.

Edit:

I scrolled up and saw how this stupid sh*t started... it was smooth light, I'm pretty sure of it.
Users browsing this topic