Any knowledge claim by an atheist is contradictory.
An atheist can't know anything.
Has anyone else noticed how pinky squirms when I confront him with invariant immaterial laws?
I do not say that professed unbelievers do not prove things. The argument is that you must borrow from the Biblical worldview, & the God who makes universal, immaterial, invariant laws possible in order to prove anything.
This type of logical proof deals with “transcendentals” or “necessary starting points,” and is called a “transcendental proof.” Any contrary view to the God of the bible being the necessary starting point for rationality is reduced to absurdity. You have to assume God, in order to argue against Him.
My faith has proof Pinky. Your's doesn't but mine does.
I have evidence & repeatable observable substance.
Transcendental as it may be, none the less your ability to know anything depends upon my faith.
Dg west deptford wrote: