And whom, in your opinion should do the regulating as you interpret it? A trustworthy gubmint agency like the AFT that redefines its definitions every couple of years? Because if you form an actual trained militia that doesn't have oversight, you will be labeled a terrorist organization.
I read an article on interpreting the "well regulated" term, and it was their assertion that it simply meant supplied. When the colonists chose to stand against Britain, they had people willing to fight, but not enough guns and ammo. That particular problem has been resolved. Let's not recreate it
Sunoverbeach wrote:
