And THIS is why our 1st Ammendment is so important...

Norwegian filmmaker faces up to 3 years in prison for saying men cannot be lesbians

https://www.foxnews.com/media/norwegian-filmmaker-faces-3-years-prison-saying-men-cannot-lesbians 

What a fugged up world LEFTY has created. 😣

Lock her up.

I have it on good information that over half the world is gay or lesbian. You don’t get any points for that anymore.

She offended a transgender female - that should be punishable by prison time.

I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body.

Every golf outing, every par 5, I tell my teammates I identify as a lesbian. But they still don't let me hit from the forward tee.

Lock 'em up

Maybe put on a skirt. A little make up. Put some effort into it.

Yup, they say you've got to dress the part to be the part.

Paul Harvey's "If I were the devil" has absolutely come to life.

Anyone who can't see the parallels to 1984 and Atlas Shrugged are just being obtuse at this point.

I can identify as a butch lesbian

Go for it SOB, I heard WOKENESS liberates you from the constraints of the natural world.

I love Freedom of Speech and Free Speech.

UF told to pay $372K in legal fees in suit over professors’ free speech


A federal judge has awarded more than $372,000 in legal fees to attorneys who represented professors in a high-profile lawsuit against the University of Florida over being able to serve as expert witnesses in court cases. Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker last week issued a 35-page ruling that rejected arguments by the university that it should not have to cover the fees. Walker awarded $372,219 in fees to attorneys from two firms, while also tacking on $1,575 in costs.

That makes two of us!!! Guess I need to cancel my trip to Norway Now!!! 🤦 😣 🇨🇮

High court won’t revive state’s drag show law

Justices deny DeSantis administration’s request to enforce statute


News Service of Florida/Orlando Sentinel
TALLAHASSEE — A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a request from Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration that would have allowed enforcement of a new state law aimed at preventing children from attending drag shows.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell this summer issued a statewide preliminary injunction against the law, finding that it violated First Amendment rights. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by Orlando restaurant and bar Hamburger Mary’s.

The DeSantis administration appealed Presnell’s ruling to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and also sought a partial stay that would have allowed the state to enforce the law against all venues in Florida — except Hamburger Mary’s — while the legal battle continues to play out.

After Presnell and a panel of the Atlanta-based appeals court rejected the state’s request for a partial stay, lawyers representing Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Secretary Melanie Griffin, the named defendant in the case, took the issue to the Supreme Court.

But the Supreme Court denied the request Thursday, effectively keeping in place the statewide preliminary injunction.
The decision did not give a full breakdown of the justices’ positions but it said Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the request for a stay.

The law, dubbed by sponsors as the “Protection of Children Act,” would prevent venues from admitting children to adult live performances. It defines adult live performances as “any show, exhibition, or other presentation in front of a live audience, which, in whole or in part, depicts or simulates nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or specific sexual activities, … lewd conduct, or the lewd exposure of prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts.”

Regulators would be able to suspend or revoke licenses of restaurants, bars and other venues that violate the law. Also, it would prohibit local governments from issuing public permits for events that could expose children to the targeted behavior. In addition, people could face first-degree misdemeanor charges for “knowingly” admitting children to adult live performances.

While the law does not specifically mention drag shows, it came after the DeSantis administration cracked down on venues in South Florida and Central Florida where children attended drag shows.

In issuing the preliminary injunction, Presnell wrote that law “is specifically designed to suppress the speech of drag queen performers” and the state “already has statutes” that protect children from seeing obscene performances.

“Defendant professes that a statewide preliminary injunction would ‘harm the public by exposing children to ‘adult live performances,’” Presnell wrote. “This concern rings hollow, however, when accompanied by the knowledge that Florida state law, presently and independently of the instant (new) statutory scheme, permits any minor to attend an R-rated film at a movie theater if accompanied by a parent or guardian.”

But in asking the Supreme Court for a partial stay, lawyers for the state said the case is not a class action. and that Hamburger Mary’s is the only plaintiff that “claims that the statute unconstitutionally deters it from presenting to children live drag shows that are not sexually explicit.”

Sooo...Chicks with Dix performing aberrant lewd suggestive acts on stage with the goal of radicalizing and sexualizing children is not sexually explicit? :-s
Good call Judgy.

Even though Drag Queen's will vehemently deny that they are being groomers, they at the same time admit that grooming children is exactly their goal.

So, you have personal knowledge of all of your post because you regularly go to drag shows all over the country, including the one in question?
.

Children do not need to be at drag shows.

And the battle for the rights of the homophobic wages on…..

"Need" = NO.

Parental discretion over their own child and their knowledge of what they are exposing them to that is not pornography = YES.

Children not being allowed at topless bars is a violation of the strippers’ first amendment rights.