MACS
  • MACS
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago
Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.
deadeyedick
2 years ago
You do you. Mailing mine for many years without issue.

I have received many cigar and wine packages that were worth $500 without any issues also.
RayR
2 years ago
There is a big difference between cigar and wine packages and mail-in ballots.
Although you'll know when your packages arrive, how do you know if your vote was counted correctly from your mail-in ballot?
deadeyedick
2 years ago
Maybe you think my mail carrier is in cahoots with the democrats?
Gene363
2 years ago
The USPS is generally OK, mail-in ballots and how they are handled, nope, nada, period.

We need to get our voting systems open, transparent, and fair so people can be confident in the results.
HockeyDad
2 years ago

There is a big difference between cigar and wine packages and mail-in ballots.
Although you'll know when your packages arrive, how do you know if your vote was counted correctly from your mail-in ballot?

RayR wrote:



California sends you a confirmation that your vote was counted before you even send it in. Super efficient!
RayR
2 years ago

Maybe you think my mail carrier is in cahoots with the democrats?

deadeyedick wrote:



He or she could be, the union is in cahoots with the Democrats because USPS is in a perpetual state of insolvency and the Democrats can always be relied on to bail them out with stolen loot.


California sends you a confirmation that your vote was counted before you even send it in. Super efficient!

HockeyDad wrote:



Man! Those California Commies sure are smart.
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
I bet your confirmation letter was hand written and signed by
"Pretty boy GAVIN NEWSOME"
rfenst
2 years ago

Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.

MACS wrote:


My county gives mail and drop-off voters a random ballot number so they can make certain what they mailed in or put in a drop box was received and counted according to their vote. Yours probably does too. It is the same as standing at the ballot scanner in person and the screen showing your vote was counted.
8trackdisco
2 years ago

The USPS is generally OK, mail-in ballots and how they are handled, nope, nada, period.

We need to get our voting systems open, transparent, and fair so people can be confident in the results.

Gene363 wrote:



+1.
KingoftheCove
2 years ago

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/election-fraud-atlantic-city/2024/02/02/id/1152037/

Stogie1020 wrote:


But……….but……..all that mail in ballot election fraud stuff was just fake news!!!
Stogie1020
2 years ago

But……….but……..all that mail in ballot election fraud stuff was just fake news!!!

KingoftheCove wrote:


It started with "There is NO evidence of ballot manipulation"

Then it became "There is no WIDESPREAD evidence of ballot manipulation"

The thing is, all you need to do is throw a single county in a few swing states and blammo, you got a winner.
rfenst
2 years ago

Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.

MACS wrote:


I would buy insurance, but doubt they would insure cash.
RobertHively
2 years ago
OP

No, and, we have elections in this country now? When did they get rid of selections?
frankj1
2 years ago

It started with "There is NO evidence of ballot manipulation"

Then it became "There is no WIDESPREAD evidence of ballot manipulation"

The thing is, all you need to do is throw a single county in a few swing states and blammo, you got a winner.

Stogie1020 wrote:


so, as always I respect your politics, as you know.
Indulge me here before you consider it nit picking, please.

The charges that have been levied for several years (since prior to Trump winning!) have been alleging a widespread organized campaign by Democrats that stole the presidential election from Trump and would have been the cause had he not won the first time(huh?)...and so far, 8 years into it, there has not been a single substantiated claim. Several promoters of the conspiracy have even admitted their willingness to advance lies in an effort to change the election.

This is not to say there have not been individual instances of voter fraud in likely every election...typically a handful of people are convicted nationally, ironically they are far more often to be pro-GOP cases (DMV inadvertently posted a link to a conservative site several years ago that provided the complete record going back several years).

More often transgressions have been limited to people being registered to vote in more than one place, almost always because they neglected to unregister when they changed residences, but also almost always did not realized it and did not attempt to vote multiple times. There were a few cases early in Trump's term when several of his staff members were shown to be examples of this. When I posted about this ages ago, a few people here discovered they too were registered in more than one place! I believe that many places have since found ways to make unregistering automatic, but I can't swear to that. They should, though.

Here's the potential nit picking part: the case involving Callaway is more of an example of "for profit" crime than "for power" crime...he has been paid by Dems and Reps alike to cheat, and this case was actually for a GOP candidate!
But it's not really the kind of case that Trump and Trumpers have been alleging for nearly a decade now.

Your last sentence is still just pointing out possibilities, it doesn't show a clear way that it has happened as Trump et al have claimed. But it's good to uncover potential threats, that's how they can be corrected and strengthen trust in the process.

It sounds like career criminals like Callahan have been clever enough to find loopholes in local systems that are unexplainable. For example, where I live I receive a mailing with a form to fill out to request mail-in ballots for specific elections and/or election cycles, which I fill out and mail back in (or drop off at Town Hall). I then receive my mail-in ballot(s) and either use them or vote in person. One may try to do both, but there is a system in place that will automatically reject whichever attempt was second. It is inconceivable that random people can pick up ballots to deliver to voters...I'm betting the case you shared will lead to correcting that insane system.

My last thought on election fraud is that people who disparage Biden by citing dementia and worse also are trying to make me believe he is a criminal mastermind who has been stealing the GOP's lunch for years.
I say, pick one! Can't both be true as they are claims that can not coexist in one old man.

As to trusting the mail...absolutely. I mail and receive checks and stuff and have never had an incident. I even mail small amounts of cash for young relatives birthdays and the like. Tax returns and other yuuugely important documents go certified mail.

I'd also trust the mail for ballots...and there is even a locked box right in front of Town Hall where I live.










Stogie1020
2 years ago
Frank, as always, I appreciate the discourse and the tone. We need more of it in this world.

From day one of the claims, (some of which actually warranted investigation) the immediate, widespread broadcast by the DNC and all its tentacles (MSM, spokepersons, politicians who read the DNC talking points, etc.) was lock step and formulated, right down to the precise verbiage used. This was highly suspicious, especially in light of the fact that there were, in fact, situations that should have been investigated. Instead, though, the party line (litterally) was to yell as loudly as posisble "there is no proof of widespread voter fraud!" over and over.

Well, it's pretty clear if you look at swing states that all you really need to do to win a close election is to make sure you win a few specific counties in a few specific swing states. Those counties will litterally decide the outcome of those states, and tip the balance for the total electoral college count. Add in the massive efforts to allow mail-in ballots (which undeniably is less secure than in-person voting) along with instances of Republican polling workers pointing out suspicious issues that were summarily dismissed or explained in unbelievable ways instead of having an actual open investigation, and it becomes entirely understandable why half the country doesn't trust the system anymore. Stories like the one I linked/posted (I have mentioned previously other ballot harvesting fraud) simply show that, given the opportunity and the stakes, cheating does happen. Just because you personally follow the rules of mail in balloting and dont try to vote twice doesn't mean that ballots cannot be printed for dead people (look at the genrally-D resistance to purge voter rolls), extra ballots with odd signatures being "provisionally" accepted and tip the balance of a county, software errors and anomolies like ballot dumps so vastly in favor of one candidate despite the locale being evenly D/R split, etc.

I think the handling of the last election (not just the claims of fraud) did more to damage confidence in the voting process than any of us realize.
rfenst
2 years ago

Frank, as always, I appreciate the discourse and the tone. We need more of it in this world.

From day one of the claims, (some of which actually warranted investigation) the immediate, widespread broadcast by the DNC and all its tentacles (MSM, spokepersons, politicians who read the DNC talking points, etc.) was lock step and formulated, right down to the precise verbiage used. This was highly suspicious, especially in light of the fact that there were, in fact, situations that should have been investigated. Instead, though, the party line (litterally) was to yell as loudly as posisble "there is no proof of widespread voter fraud!" over and over.

Well, it's pretty clear if you look at swing states that all you really need to do to win a close election is to make sure you win a few specific counties in a few specific swing states. Those counties will litterally decide the outcome of those states, and tip the balance for the total electoral college count. Add in the massive efforts to allow mail-in ballots (which undeniably is less secure than in-person voting) along with instances of Republican polling workers pointing out suspicious issues that were summarily dismissed or explained in unbelievable ways instead of having an actual open investigation, and it becomes entirely understandable why half the country doesn't trust the system anymore. Stories like the one I linked/posted (I have mentioned previously other ballot harvesting fraud) simply show that, given the opportunity and the stakes, cheating does happen. Just because you personally follow the rules of mail in balloting and dont try to vote twice doesn't mean that ballots cannot be printed for dead people (look at the genrally-D resistance to purge voter rolls), extra ballots with odd signatures being "provisionally" accepted and tip the balance of a county, software errors and anomolies like ballot dumps so vastly in favor of one candidate despite the locale being evenly D/R split, etc.

I think the handling of the last election (not just the claims of fraud) did more to damage confidence in the voting process than any of us realize.

Stogie1020 wrote:


Trump has proved nothing.
He and his minions are responsible for mass election distrust.
frankj1
2 years ago
as Rudy said...we have theories, we are looking for proof.

still waiting for Trump to prove that Emmy Awards were stolen from The Apprentice.

There's a loooong history here.
HockeyDad
2 years ago

Trump has proved nothing.
He and his minions are responsible for mass election distrust.

rfenst wrote:



Elon Musk proved everything.
Users browsing this topic