His legacy now tarnished to the point a full colostomy bag serves a more useful function...delivers a blow to the Judicial Branch. He's already damaged the Executive Branch, he's on a roll.





The plan to pack the Supreme Court is a more consequential attack on the constitutional order than January 6th.

It’s difficult to sit here and make substantive arguments against the Democrats’ Supreme Court “reform” proposal, since everyone knows it’s just a cynical ploy to delegitimize both the court and the Constitution.

Ask yourself this: would any Democrat support the president’s court-packing scheme if they believed Republicans would win both Houses and the presidency? Of course not. It’s Calvinball all the way down.

And it is a court packing scheme. An unconstitutional one. One imagines the term “court packing” hasn’t polled very well with the public, so Joe Biden — or whoever’s running the White House these days — signed off on a backdoor plan. An 18-year term limit for justices would, very conveniently, turn a 6-3 originalist majority into a 6-3 “living and breathing document” majority that would overturn many recent decisions, and rubber stamp a slew of federal abuses.

One might argue it’s all just an election gimmick, since the chances of the reform package passing are close to nil. That’s not the point. The left has normalized the notion that the Supreme Court is both illegitimate and corrupt if it fails to bend to the will of partisans.

After all, none of the left’s objections are grounded in anything resembling a legal argument. The entire case is centered around the specious idea that the court is failing because it does not adhere to the political vision of Democrats. They don’t even pretend to care about neutrality in law, much less the law itself. The contemporary leftist is a consequentialist with no limiting principles.

Speaking of authoritarians. Kamala Harris contends that packing the Supreme Court is necessary because “there is a clear crisis of confidence facing the Supreme Court.” Is there?

First off, we find ourselves here because of decades-long attacks on the institution. Democrats have made a mockery of confirmation hearings since the 1980s. After Barack Obama publicly castigated the Supreme Court for upholding the First Amendment, things really took off. Wealthy progressive activist groups began cooking up pretend scandals and laundering them through faux journalistic operations. The media can now affix the phrase “plagued by ethic scandals,” or some such nonsense, to every mention of the court. If there is any crisis of confidence, it’s because the left concocted one.

Even still, as Casey Mattox helpfully points out, Gallup finds that 30 percent of Americans have a “Great Deal/Quite a Lot” of confidence in the Supreme Court. The number has risen slightly in the past two years. Another 31 percent say they have “Some” confidence in SCOTUS.

So, let’s set aside that pesky Article 3 of the Constitution for a moment. If polling is the excuse for stripping the independence of a branch of government, why would we allow Congress, with its 9 percent confidence rating, to do it?

Justices already enforce a code of judicial conduct. There is zero evidence any of them have engaged in unethical behavior on the bench that personally benefited a third party, much less themselves. And there is no evidence justices have deviated from their long-held legal philosophies because they vacationed with a rich friend or any other reason.

It’s also worth remembering that Democrats invented a bunch of new standards to smear Clarence Thomas that they would never follow themselves. Most judicial committee members leading the charge to delegitimize the court have traded in on their position to enrich themselves, including ****** Durbin, Vietnam War fabulist Richard Blumenthal, conspiracy theorist Sheldon Whitehouse, and Peter Welch.

Come to think of it, maybe SCOTUS should be writing ethics rules for Congress.

Democrats want to institute their ethics code to create a system that allows partisans — armed with the newest garbage Politico or ProPublica churns out for its progressive funders — to slander justices in another congressional show trial and bogus investigations. Sorry, the Supreme Court is an equal branch of government. Chuck Schumer is free to threaten justices, but they still don’t answer to him.

Nor do they answer to Biden, whose family became wealthy peddling a shady influence racket. The presidency, incidentally, has a 26 percent confidence rating with Gallup. The media, deservingly, is near the bottom of the list. Americans, in fact, have more trust in the Supreme Court than they do state-run schools or unions or big business or banks or the criminal justice system.

“What is happening now is not normal, and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions, including those impacting personal freedoms. We now stand in a breach,” Biden says.

The only “personal freedom” Democrats are concerned about is legalizing abortion on demand into the ninth month. Just say Dobbs, because I can’t think of a single individual liberty the contemporary left wants to safeguard or enhance.

The president is correct in noting that the court has abnormally upheld the Constitution in recent years. Even then, majority concurrences are quite diverse. And the notion that the textualists walk lock step more than the left is a complete fantasy, as the last session showed.

The president, by the way, has been in government since 1973. Two-thirds of the members of the Democrat-controlled Senate are now older than 70. Judiciary chair Durbin has been in Congress since 1982.

Anyway, the lifetime appointments for justices are meant to shield the high court from the vagaries and fleeting pressures of political debate. That is exactly what bothers the left the most: the Supreme Court doing its job. If we knew exactly when confirmation votes were going to take place, the process would degenerate into an even uglier partisan mess. That, again, is exactly what the anti-norm leftist desires.

Indeed, the Democrats’ plan to pack the Supreme Court, the last properly functioning institution in D.C., is an attack on the constitutional order, and its long-term consequences are far more corrosive than anything that happened on Jan. 6. It’s not even close, really.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/31/dems-promise-to-save-democracy-by-destroying-the-supreme-court/ 




#FJB

What did we give up in exchange?




In a massive overnight night development, Russia has released Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former US Marine Paul Whelan in a prisoner swap, Bloomberg and others confirm.

Some sources are saying that as many as 20 and 30 political prisoners and journalists might be part of a multi-country exchange reportedly in progress, but what's certain is that Gershkovich and Whelan are currently on their way to freedom.

"The men, jailed in Russia on espionage charges they and the US deny, are en route to destinations outside of Russia," reports Bloomberg. "The US and its allies will return prisoners to Russia that they hold under the deal, the people said, asking for anonymity to discuss matters that aren’t yet public."

And The Moscow Times speculated overnight as rumors swirled of an impending major deal with Moscow, "Russia may be preparing to free between 20 and 30 political prisoners and journalists in an imminent exchange with the United States and Germany, a source familiar with the planning said, in what, if confirmed, would be the largest swap since the end of the Cold War." However, these latter details have yet to be confirmed. It is also as yet unclear who on the Russian side is being freed.

Only very recently, on July 19, a Yekaterinburg handed down a very significant 16-year prison sentence in Gershkovich's espionage case, after he had been behind bars since is March 2023 arrest.

Russian authorities claim he was spying for the CIA while investigating a major Russian defense company in Yekaterinburg, a city which lies east of the Ural Mountains.

It is widely believed that Russia was using the case as a bargaining chip all along, in order to free high level Russian detainees in the West, just like the prisoner swap involving Brittney Griner and Viktor Bout played out.

As for Marine veteran Paul Whelan, who was issued a 16-year sentence in 2020 on charges of espionage - which the US government condemned as false and unfair - his family had long complained that his case didn't get the attention from Washington that it deserved. But his fate appears to have suddenly and drastically changed for the better.

Could it be that Tucker Carlson's big interview with President Vladimir Putin had a part to play, or got the ball rolling in the prisoner deal?

Tucker Carlson spent roughly 10 to 15 minutes imploring Vladimir Putin to release the WSJ's Evan Gershkovich, vehemently arguing why it's unjust to keep him -- in a way that no corporate journalist would ever dare do with Biden about Assange.https://t.co/YWZXNbRtS7 pic.twitter.com/xsLsdUFwq8
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 8, 2024

Footage has emerged showing that the prisoner exchanged happened in Turkey...

NOW: Prisoner exchange held in Ankara Esenboğa Airport, Türkiye under the coordination of the Turkish Intelligence Service (MIT).

https://t.co/21TewE8ioe  pic.twitter.com/jRLlxw2nxR
— Clash Report (@clashreport) August 1, 2024

The below is a potential list of persons involved, but is still unconfirmed as the situation is developing...

American Prisoners to be Released:

Evan Gershkovich: Wall Street Journal reporter arrested in March 2023, charged with espionage.
Paul Whelan: Marine veteran arrested in December 2018, sentenced to 16 years for espionage charges.
Alsu Kurmasheva: Russian-American radio journalist detained in June 2023 for allegedly spreading false information about the Russian army.

Other Prisoners Involved:

At least 12 political prisoners held in Russia are expected to be released to Germany.
Eight Russian nationals are to be returned to Russia, including some with suspected ties to Russian intelligence.
Vadim Krasikov, a convicted murderer serving a life sentence in Germany, is expected to be part of the swap.
Vladimir Kara-Murza, a Kremlin critic and Washington Post contributor, is expected to be flown to the U.S.

developing...

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/wsjs-evan-gershkovich-ex-marine-paul-whelan-freed-russia-major-prisoner-swap-us 

We have a track record with Biden giving away arms dealers, terrorists and murderers to rescue a sniveling kneeler. Hey Joe...any news on the American hostages Hamas has STILL? I mean you never mention THEM!

We gave them Alaska in the exchange.

Would it even surprise you if Biden said something like that?

NEVER FORGET! They said.




"The Administration’s cowardice in the face of terror is a national disgrace."

Republican Kentucky Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell condemned the Biden-Harris Administration for what he described as weakness in the face of America’s enemies.

“The plea deal with terrorists – including Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks that killed thousands of Americans – is a revolting abdication of the government’s responsibility to defend America and provide justice,” McConnell said, New York Post reported.

McConnell was not alone in his bitterness that three defendants allegedly involved in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks have entered into a plea deal with the United States Department of Defense (DOD) after years of incarceration at Guantanamo Bay.

Nearly 3,000 people were killed, and many thousands more injured in the coordinated Islamist suicide attacks carried out by al-Qaeda on U.S. soil in 2001.

As Stephen Katte reports via The Epoch Times, according to a July 31 statement from the DOD, Susan Escallier, who is the Convening Authority for Military Commissions, has entered into pretrial agreements with Khalid Shaikh (Sheikh) Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin' Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

Mohammad, a Kuwaiti-Pakistani mechanical engineer, was the former head of al-Qaeda’s propaganda department and is accused of being the 911 mastermind. He allegedly presented the idea of hijacking planes and flying them into U.S. buildings to Osama bin Laden around 1996, and later helped train some of the hijackers.

Hawsawi has been accused of helping with financial and travel arrangements for the hijackers. Attash is accused of assisting with combat training for the terrorists.

Specific terms and conditions of the pretrial agreements have not been made publicly available by the DOD.

The three defendants, along with two others, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Ramzi Bin al Shibh, were first jointly charged and arraigned in June 2008. They were charged and prosecuted again in May 2012.

Aziz Ali and al Shibh did not enter into the plea deal. Last September, a military judge ruled that al Shibh was too mentally incompetent to stand trial.

ACLU Says Death Penalty Off the Table

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a non-profit civil rights advocacy group, says Mohammed is their client, and the deal involved the defendants agreeing to plead guilty in exchange for life imprisonment instead of the death penalty.

Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU, said in a July 31 statement that this deal was the “right call” for everybody involved, especially after “nearly two decades of litigation.”

“This plea agreement further underscores the fact that the death penalty is out of step with the fundamental values of our democratic system. It is inhumane, inequitable, and unjust,” he said.

“We urge the U.S. government to also quickly relocate the men cleared for transfer, and finally end all indefinite detentions and unfair trials at Guantánamo.”

According to Romero, “closing the chapter on these cases with a plea agreement will also provide a measure of transparency and justice for 9/11 family members.”

That's not how the families of the victims see this plea deal...

In a media statement about the plea agreement, Brett Eagleson, president of 9/11 Justice, a grassroots movement made up of survivors of the terrorist attacks and family members of those lost, said the group was “deeply troubled by these plea deals.”

“These plea deals should not perpetuate a system of closed-door agreements, where crucial information is hidden without giving the families of the victims the chance to learn the full truth,” he said.

Eagleson said the 9/11 Justice group wants more access “to these individuals for information” to provide closure for all those affected by the terrorist attacks.

Republican New York Rep. Mike Lawler described the plea deals as a slap in the face to the families and survivors of 9/11.

“Disgusting that these terrorist scumbags are being let off without a trial. 9/11 victims, their families, and our heroic first responders deserve true justice!” he posted on Twitter.

The White House clarified President Joe Biden was informed of the plea agreement only on Wednesday and had no role in the process, which is being handled through the military justice system, according to the New York Post.

Former President Donald Trump’s administration previously rejected any plea bargains with the suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/national-disgrace-republican-lawmakers-blast-biden-admin-plea-deal-three-911-defendants 

Heard on the radio a NY Fire Chief state "How am I supposed to forget the 3 officers we lose a month from 9/11 medical conditions suffered at Ground Zero that day?"


#FJB

#2025
This whole scenario makes me sick. I agree with what is written in the post. At the same time, I’m sickened at how America has managed this “program”. I know it is complicated and a thorny issue to say the least. However, the way it was handled was not in keeping with the values of our country. If we didn’t have offenses that were satisfactory to charge them with then they should not have been taken prisoner. Battlefield justice would have sufficed. We made a lot of mistakes after 9/11 and this was one of the big ones. This is just my opinion, as usual. I understand that others will disagree and see the scenario differently than I.

Well, it is quite a dilemma isn't it. One that I thought really had been resolved. The way this administration handles anything though...Biden should have the 25th Amendment used against him now. He's only doing damage to our closest allies, the American institutions of government and now with grieving families and survivors of the greatest terrorist attack (so far, because with all the illegal aliens cut loose in America today its a only a matter of when we're attacked again!) on American soil to date. No mercy should be employed with these type of humans.

Respect your take though. Out of curiosity...veteran?

Yes, I’m a veteran. No mercy should have been our original plan. Seeking “closure” is ambiguous and resulted in this mess. Those people should have been terminated as combatants when they were discovered.

👍

Thought so, but didn't want to guess. Some of the phrases kinda gave you away.

Right on. Thanks for asking 😎

Follow up on post #2025


https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/wsjs-evan-gershkovich-ex-marine-paul-whelan-freed-russia-major-prisoner-swap-us [/i][/color]


Look, I'm glad the Americans are freed...but what was given for innocent people to begin with[barf]

It’s a bit of a quagmire when you think about it.

One option would have been to simply shoot them when they were captured. We the public have no idea if they any of them have provided any meaningful intelligence. But by executing them immediately we can be certain none would have been gained.

Since they were not executed and instead brought to a US military installation then they effectively enter the US legal system. As such, as distasteful as it may seem, we are a nation of laws so if we start picking and choosing who is and who isn’t entitled to the minimum protections of the law then we devolve into the very society we find so disgusting.

As far as the plea deal itself I wonder if it’s really such a bad thing. Rest assured they will all be sent to ADX Florence to live out the rest of their lives as did Ted Kazinsky which was virtually forgotten.

Or we could continue on the same path we were on. Many more years would go by wrangling in court before a trial even took place. Assuming they were found guilty which by the way wasn’t guaranteed. There would be decades of appeals. Each time a hearing came up they would once again they would command top billing in world wide media. There is a better than average chance one or more would die in prison before any death sentence was carried out.

As it is now they may stay in the news cycle a day or too. More depending on how much outrage is expressed over the plea deal. Then they will cease to be relevant. More than likely the next time any of their names are mentioned will be when the start dying off in prison.

So I ask, when all things are considered did we really get a raw deal? As a veteran I tend to think everything will work out just fine.

worth thinking about...
thanks.

It's not fine and there's NOTHING to think about. All this does is set up snatch and grab open season on Americans abroad. America will give away the store. This is what you get with feckless leadership in Washington.

“The deal that made this possible was a feat of diplomacy and friendship,” Biden said Thursday in brief remarks from the White House, flanked by family members of the prisoners. He praised U.S. allies, saying that “they stood with us, and they made bold and brave decisions, released prisoners being held in their countries.”

“This is a very good afternoon,” said Biden, who has had few of those in the past several months. “A very good afternoon.”

U.S. officials on Thursday insisted that the prisoner swap was by no means the advent of a new detente between Washington and Moscow. Instead, they maintained, it was a deal driven by cold calculations of national interest, a deal in which every side got something it wanted.

If it demonstrated the potential of diplomacy, it also carried a more chilling message from Putin, the former spymaster: He could succeed in snatching and holding Americans and other Westerners hostage in the service of recovering those he sends abroad to do the dirty work of the Russian state.

Continued on the same article...

"In December 2022, authorities in the small, Central European country of Slovenia made two arrests that might, at first, have seemed of little consequence. They brought in a couple posing as Argentine emigres in the country, living under the pseudonyms Ludwig Gisch and Maria Mayer, who were living a quiet life in the Slovenian capital.

As it turns out, the couple were Russian “illegals,” deep-cover intelligence officers sent abroad to spy on foreign governments.

The arrests would prove critical for the prisoner exchange. At the time, the United States had been trying to secure the release of Whelan — who had been arrested in Russia four years earlier on espionage charges — but were always unsuccessful because there was nobody in U.S. custody the Russians believed was worthy of a swap.

Now, with the arrests in Slovenia, U.S. officials figured they had something to barter.

The following month, in January 2023, CIA officials held secret talks with Russian spies to offer a deal: Whelan’s release in exchange for the couple arrested in Slovenia. The Russians rejected the offer, but made it clear that they were willing to negotiate if the Americans offered more."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/behind-deal-spies-killer-secret-114416710.html 

Just like the Griner exchange we got outmaneuvered. In that one we got a sniveling kneeler weed smoking lesbo that can bounce a basketball and Putin gets an arms dealer that's been put back in the game with Ukraine! That exchange should've NEVER happened. This one is almost as bad.

Getting allies to make the same bad deals as us? That's not diplomacy on any lasting level. That's called being used.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/deal-with-the-devil-how-germany-played-key-role-in-west-russia-prisoner-swap/ar-BB1r42x5 [/i][/color]

President Joe Biden raised eyebrows this week when he told a freed prisoner’s young daughter “no serious guys until you’re 30” after singing her Happy Birthday.

The awkward incident unfolded on Thursday at the White House as President Biden, 81, welcomed four Americans home following a historic prisoner-swap with Russia.

Only Biden can make a serious situation creepy.

"Remember, no serious guys until you're 30"pic.twitter.com/1CO3Js7cIg
— Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹 (@saras76) August 1, 2024

Bumbling Biden said: “Tomorrow is a big day, the 13th birthday of Miriam. As you all know, we have a tradition in the Biden family. We sing Happy Birthday.”

He later teased: “And remember, no serious guys until you’re 30. God love you.”

Biden then got serious, adding: “Now she gets to celebrate with her mom. That’s what this is all about – family, able to be together again, like they should have been all along.”

The “creepy” commander-in-chief was blasted on social media after the uncomfortable incident went viral – with many users calling the interaction “gross”.

Alsu Kurmasheva, 47, hugs her daughter after being freed from captivity in a massive prisoner swap with Russia.

One X user wrote: “He’s so gross.”

Another added: “He puts the creep in creepy.”

A third viewer scoffed: “Is prisoner swap with Russia really the time to hit on 11 yr old girls, Joe? Holy Mother of God, are you a horrendous human being.”

Russia Releases Journalist Evan Gershkovich and Former Marine Paul Whelan in Historic Prisoner Swap With U.S.
7 of the Craziest Events Before the 2024 Presidential Election: Donald Trump's Assassination Attempt, Joe Biden Dropping Out
Biden Endorsed Kamala as a Final ‘Big F--- You’ Act to Obama — in Bid to Thwart Ex-Prez’s ‘Mini-Primary’

Kurmasheva, 47, was arrested in the Russian city of Kazan in October 2023 and charged with failure to register as a foreign agent. She was then sentenced to six-and-a-half years in prison in July for spreading false information about the Russian army.

The journalist was one of the four Americans freed on Thursday in a massive prisoner-swap that also saw Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, 32, and former U.S. Marine Paul Whelan, 54, released from Russian captivity.

Biden discussed the massive prisoner exchange deal – which was cut among the U.S., Germany, Slovenia, Norway, Poland, Turkey and Russia – after Kurmasheva, Gershkovich, Whelan and Vladimir Kara-Murza, 42, were safely returned home.

He said: “Their brutal ordeal is over, and they are free.”

President Biden faced backlash after Vice President Kamala Harris led the charge and welcomed the four freed Americans home to U.S. soil.

But the octogenarian president – who abruptly ended his 2024 re-election campaign and dropped out of the race for the White House on July 21 – also created newfound concerns about his health upon welcoming the Russian captives back home this week.

According to Daily Mail, witnesses present at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on Thursday night said Biden “stared blankly” and “looked off into the distance” while Vice President Kamala Harris welcomed Kurmasheva, Gershkovich, Whelan and Kara-Murza off the plane from Turkey.

He was also said to have only moved once during the post-midnight event – to scratch his head with what one onlooker described as a “vacant appearance.”

One person took to X to criticize President Biden for his appearance at Joint Base Andrews, saying: “This dude is not there.”

Another added: “Joe Biden is gone. Absolutely freaking gone. This is pathetic.”

A third user asked: “Why is the VP having to speak for the President?”

https://radaronline.com/p/joe-biden-freed-prisoner-daughter-12-no-serious-guys-until-youre-30/ 


Liked him better in hiding.

Trump era policy and AFT took a big “L” in court….District Judge Reed O’Connor authored a scathing decision on the forced reset trigger case.

But the AFT is another rogue extremist criminal organization that will probably not comply fully with the order, and will probably appeal.

This started with JDT and bump stocks (separate court case) which birthed the abuse of chevron deference which led to these LEGAL triggers being deemed machine guns.

You don't believe the SCOTUS muzzled (see what I did there?) rogue alphabet agencies without legislation?

Double down on the delusional.





Nancy Pelosi has suggested that Joe Biden should be added to Mount Rushmore, despite the fact that she was reportedly the ringleader in a Democratic Party effort to throw him under the bus.

Pelosi made the comments during a CBS interview, where she refused to talk about her role in getting rid of Biden, smirking and answering with cryptic statements such as “I did not call one person.”

It was widely reported that Pelosi told Biden that he could either step down “the easy way” or be removed “the hard way.” Biden is apparently furious with her, as mentioned by interviewer Lesley Stahl in this clip.

https://t.co/BtvgDUKdYf  pic.twitter.com/cnJ8ywR5sU
— CBS Sunday Morning 🌞 (@CBSSunday) August 3, 2024

She didn’t need to call anyone.

"I didn't call anyone" is probably the worst excuse she could have come up with.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) August 4, 2024

As we previously highlighted, the end for Biden came after Pelosi suddenly changed her tune, going from defending him one day to saying that it was time to question his mental acuity the next.

During the CBS interview Pelosi called Biden “Such a consequential president of the United States, a Mount Rushmore kind of president of the United States.”

Stahl seemed awestruck at this preposterous suggestion and laughed at Pelosi.

“Are you really saying that he belongs up there on Mount Rushmore? Lincoln and Joe Biden?” she asked.

“You’ve got Teddy Roosevelt up there!” replied Pelosi. adding “You can add Biden.”

Yeah, no.

I found Nancy Pelosi’s new design for Mount Rushmore and it is even more glorious than I could have ever imagined. pic.twitter.com/rhDs1NGYt8
— Nice Guy Eddie (@pompousgrass) August 5, 2024

Sure... Joe's added to Mount Rushmore as per Crazy Nancy Pelosi! pic.twitter.com/Jnso8utcTQ
— ChazBoul (@CvBoul1) August 5, 2024

pic.twitter.com/ds6ZWLKwEq
— 2GirlzShyofA3some (@YensTheBanned) August 4, 2024

But Joe Biden belongs on Mount Rushmore 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 pic.twitter.com/bG3AfqhRDC
— 🇺🇸Mike🇺🇸 (@FreedomFan88) August 5, 2024

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/interviewer-laughs-pelosi-saying-biden-should-be-mount-rushmore 

^ What can one say about the crazy utterances of an old delusional crooked Lizard Lady like Pelosi who is AlEdGeDly.drunk all the time? :-k

It's crazy enough that she has such reverence for an uncompleted sculpture financed largely with government largess, nestled in the Black Hills, a sacred land that was stolen from the Sioux Indians after it was promised to be theirs forever, and whose main sculpturer was a man with ties to white supremacy and the KKK.

A new interim staff report from the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, published on Monday, highlights how the Biden administration, with 'Border Czar' VP Kamala Harris, facilitated the greatest illegal alien invasion ever on the United States.

The report titled "Terror At Our Door: How The Biden-Harris Administration's Open-Borders Policies Undermine National Security And Endanger Americans" revealed that the failed southern border policies of President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris have flooded the nation with more than 5.4 million illegal aliens. Additionally, at least 1.9 million known "gotaways" also entered, bringing the total to 7.3 million illegal entries.

Fox News' Bill Melugin, who also reviewed the report, said the border data that dates back between 2021-23 shows "at least 99 illegal aliens on the FBI terror watchlist were released into the US after being arrested by Border Patrol at the southern border, and another 34 watchlisted aliens are still in DHS custody."

And this.

"With the border in chaos under the Biden-Harris Administration, the terrorist threat to the homeland has skyrocketed. This border insecurity has been the Administration's choice, and it is a mistake," the report stated.

The report noted that 375 illegal aliens on the US Gov'ts terrorist watchlist have been apprehended by Border Patrol agents under Biden's first term with VP Harris as Border Czar.

The report continued, "That is a more than 3,000 percent increase of watchlisted alien encounters compared to all four years of the Trump Administration."

At the end of last month, leftist MSM spent days in an all-out propaganda media blitz to convince voters that VP Harris was never border Czar - that's because the nation killing open southern borders pushed by Biden & Harris is such a disastrous topic during the election cycle.

Meanwhile, national security 'experts' have warned countless times that the Biden-Harris Administration's open-border policies can only suggest it's only a matter of time before a terror event unfolds in the US.

Just last week, we reported...

Three Palestinian Terror Suspects Detained At Southern Border As Agents Lament Lack Of Resources

In June.

8 Suspected Illegal Alien Terrorists Arrested In New York, Philadelphia & LA

In April.

Afghan Migrant On Terror List Released By Immigration Judge, Free To Roam USA

And in March.

Iranian Assassin On The Loose In America, Targeting Trump-era Officials

This aged well.

Bill, I find this very difficult to understand given that the Border Czar said that terrorists were not crossing over the southern border. pic.twitter.com/INz9hG4lUq
— Ian McKelvey (@ian_mckelvey) August 5, 2024

A majority of Americans care about two things ahead of the elections: 1) inflation and 2) the border.

For Harris and Obama's Democrat party, there's no escaping that disastrous border issue.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/biden-harris-release-99-illegal-aliens-fbi-terror-watchlist-american-communities 


Have no fear...she'll get better as President on this. You just have to elect her and then she will.