RayR
  • RayR
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
No, you can't run government like a business.

Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E Is a DODGE

By Thomas DiLorenzo
August 21, 2024

Elon Musk has announced that he would like to serve in a Trump administration as the head of a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency which he labeled the D.O.G.E. Just what we need: A new federal bureaucracy. Former President Trump did convene such a “commission” during his presidency that turned out to be useless, but nevertheless responded that Musk’s suggestion was a great idea.

In reality, the phrase “government efficiency” is as much a contradiction in terms as say, “jumbo shrimp,” “double extra-large slim fit,” or “military intelligence.” It reminded me of how my friend and coauthor, Professor James Bennett of George Mason University and an adjunct scholar of the Heritage Foundation, was asked to be on the Reagan administration’s “government efficiency commission.” (Every administration has one). After many months of useless bureaucratic meetings Jim received in the mail a framed certificate of appreciation from the federal government and all the glass had been smashed to smithereens. “Typical of government efficiency,” I recall him saying.

Businessmen like Trump and Musk are always talking about making government more “business-like,” and an “efficiency commission” is always the first step. Put us in charge, they say, and government will become a smooth-running machine. (God help us if that were to be true). Efficient government is about as likely as making a cat bark like a dog or a dog meow like a cat. Government is inherently inefficient because of its very nature.

MORE:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/08/thomas-dilorenzo/elon-musks-d-o-g-e-is-a-dodge/ 

frankj1
a year ago
I'll give ya a pity post...
RayR
  • RayR
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
Thanks for nothing Frank. You could have at least said something intelligent related to the subject of the post.
Of course, if the subject is too cerebral, I understand.
MACS
a year ago
Just eliminating the waste, fraud, and abuse would be extremely helpful. Get rid of the "regulations" that make a $6 hammer cost $47.
Abrignac
a year ago

Just eliminating the waste, fraud, and abuse would be extremely helpful. Get rid of the "regulations" that make a $6 hammer cost $47.

MACS wrote:



That was like 20 years ago. That hammer probably costs two fiddy now.
RayR
  • RayR
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
The problem with "eliminating the waste, fraud, and abuse", is the same characters will be put in charge who created the the waste, fraud, and abuse.
HockeyDad
a year ago

The problem with "eliminating the waste, fraud, and abuse", is the same characters will be put in charge who created the the waste, fraud, and abuse.

RayR wrote:



Well they know it best.
jeebling
a year ago
Some hammers will cost a couple bucks and some will cost a hundred bucks. In the military you have to use specific pots of money to install new things or repair old things. When the consumable funds are exhausted and you need a one dollar gasket to in order to remove and repair a simple check valve you must use the repair funds. When using repair funds you must use milspec parts. More often the gasket you need is only available with an entire new check valve that costs a few hundred dollars. Sometimes the kits come with the required tools. If the boss is sick and tired of seeing a puddle or water every morning and doesn’t want to defer maintenance until consumable funds are available, the very expensive kit must be ordered with repair funds. It’s just as simple as it sounds. That’s how it was when I joined the Navy in 1986 and that’s how it remained when I retired in 2011. I doubt it has changed much. On older or bigger ships, I could order a few hundred dollars worth of parts to repair a pump in my shop. On a Frigate, for example, you can’t do that. You have to remove and replace the entire pump and the simple job must be completed at a depot level repair facility. Ship’s company is not allowed to do the remove/replace work. Very often, these jobs are farmed out to contractors who must have, for example, their own gas free engineers, safety officers, and quality control officers. The cost difference is astronomical. This is something I have personal experience with and I’ve just given a few simple examples. The air and submarine services are a whole degree more expensive than the examples from the surface fleet that I listed. I was just a knuckle dragging fleet sailor.
Robert Sanders 1
a year ago
Musk is always angling for something for his own benifit.
Users browsing this topic