Job postings for positions with the Harris-Walz campaign (in this case, “Associate Producer/Road Media Manager”) allow applicants to indicate their preferred pronouns from the following options: 1) He/him, 2) She/her, 3) They/them, 4) Xe/xem, 5) Ze/hir, 6) Ey/em, 7) Hir/hir, 😎 Fae/faer, and 9) Hu/hu. Since that inventory isn’t comprehensive enough to account for all the seemingly thousands of “genders” that exist in progressive circles, there are the additional options for an applicant to request “name only,” or provide alternative pronouns that were not listed. The write-in box also accommodates those who are indecisive; after all, some “folx” prefer to be referred to as “she” and “they” interchangeably. The job listing further instructs applicants to “please list all languages in which you are fluent.” But I reckon all applicants would be guilty of lying if they claimed to be fluent in English, given that no person could possibly know the infinite pseudo-pronouns apparently used by members of the Harris campaign staff.

This particular job listing has an “optional diversity survey.” It similarly prompts respondents to indicate their preferred pronouns, and further includes questions about “gender identity,” race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and veteran status. Here is another optional survey question: “Do you identify as a member of the disability community?” (Notably, this does not ask if applicants have a disability; rather, it inquires about an applicant’s self-perceived affiliation with a nebulous “community” that has no clear barrier to entry.) But perhaps that question is superfluous: since the people who prefer the pseudo-pronouns “fae/faer” may have symptoms that point to narcissism, delusion, increased sensitivity, and an authoritarian impulse to control the speech of others.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/harris-walz-campaign-do-you-prefer-fae-faer-pronouns/ 

Beyoncé’s performance was great.

HockeyDad wrote:

You think I’m a poo throwing monkey too?

ZRX1200 wrote:

I guessed it was just another empty pantsuit speech full of hate and lies. And I was proven right! You hate that.

Besides that don't know how to Cut n' 'Paste, and you hate the excellently framed criticisms and opinions of others that you don't like.
You old curmudgeon you.

RayR wrote:

Hate - is something I assiduously avoid.
Often misdirected, intoxicating and dangerous.
It is a unique substance. It does more damage to any vessel that holds it than anything it is poured upon.


What in her speech did you find hateful?

Brewha wrote:

Kamala Harris used her first major address as the Democratic nominee for president to combine a personal recounting of her middle-class roots with a sharp prosecution of the case against electing Donald Trump to another term.

She called Trump an "unserious man" but said the consequences of putting him back in the White House would have "serious consequences."

Harris took the stage after three days of an enthusiastic Democratic convention. The political environment dramatically transformed in a matter of a few weeks after President Biden’s dismal debate performance on June 28.

Just last month Democrats were distraught and resigned to losing the White House in the fall, and potentially losing both the Senate and any prospects to retake control of the House of Representatives. But Biden dropped out of the race and endorsed Harris, and the 2024 race for the White House was completely upended.

The vice president, donning a dark pantsuit on stage at Chicago's United Center, addressed a convention hall with many delegates donning white attire — the color of the women's suffragette movement. The convention hall was at capacity, with security officials restricting access to some levels of the hall hours before Harris' speech. Delegates drowned out the music with loud cheers and a prolonged standing ovation as she took the stage.


MORE:

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/22/g-s1-19111/watch-kamala-harris-dnc-speech-democratic-national-convention 

How did this escape everyone watching the convention and hearing all the eloquent speeches that state crime has gone down....


https://www.aol.com/texas-dnc-delegate-robbed-gunpoint-193444899.html 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/aug/22/22-shot-six-dead-in-chicago-during-first-three-day/ 


Everyone knows that crimes are going unreported and fed into the national crime numbers and have since Pedo Joe and the DNC unleashed ANTIFA/BLM footsoldiers on the nation. Its a complete $hitshow but hey...we got to see some of the greatest carbetbaggers of all-time move their lips and preach down to America!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

When accused of being a socialist, Kamala Harris’s running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, was quoted as saying, “One man’s socialism is another man’s neighborliness.”

On the surface, this folksy retort seems harmless and even a bit inspirational. What’s wrong with being neighborly? Shouldn’t we all strive to embody such ideals? It is the Christian thing to do, after all — love your neighbor as you love yourself.

However, this is actually a clever manipulation tactic known as weaponized empathy — and it is a favorite tool within the progressive socialist toolbox.

Weaponized Empathy

It is reminiscent of the “Think of the Children” fallacy, where one attempts to win an argument purely through emotional manipulation, using children to garner pity, rather than by using facts and logic. A good example of such a tactic is often seen in debates around illegal immigration, where children of illegal immigrants are used as props to stir emotions to avoid confronting the problems surrounding the large number of immigrants still sneaking over our borders. The implication is that if you disagree with illegal immigration, you do not care about the suffering of immigrant children.

Weaponized empathy may be the most common (and often, the only) defense of progressive policies, and it serves as rationalization for all manner of government intervention.

During COVID, if you refused the experimental vaccine, you were told that you didn’t care about others and wanted people’s grandmothers to die.

If you didn’t support Black Lives Matter during the riots of 2020, you were called a racist and told that you didn’t care about black people.

If you are pro-life, you are told that you don’t care about women — or worse, actively want to control their bodies and make them suffer.

Many people even take up progressive positions, not because they deeply believe in them, but simply because they want to avoid the social ostracization that comes with rejecting them. The tactic is effective. The message is that if you don’t believe in or actively support progressive policies, you don’t care about others. If you don’t support the means, you don’t care about the ends.

Now, Tim Walz wants us to believe that if we don’t support socialist policies, we are not being neighborly. If we don’t support expansive government programs and interventions, we just want our neighbors to suffer. Socialism is the only solution. Think of the children!

MORE:

https://stream.org/neighborly-socialism/ 

Planned Parenthood offering free vasectomies for dudes for Harris!

Lord oh mighty you can’t even make this 💩 up….

ZRX1200 wrote:

You don't fool me with your preaching of peace and love BS. You are full of hate like Kamala.

She wore a dark empty pantsuit on stage.
She repeated many dark hateful lies.
She is full of bitterness, cynicism, and divisiveness.

RayR wrote: