At the RNC people were happy and enthusiastic. At the DNC they were calling for the political opposition to be imprisoned while the line at the abortion bus was flowing like terrorists over the southern border. That’s a helluva vibe.

jeebling wrote:

Funny, I didn’t hear republicans complain about lock her up chants for Hilary… jet when Democrats call for an actual felon to be locked up republicans have a problem with it…

drglnc wrote:

I don't understand why the speeches keep preaching about how they are gonna fix things in the country that are wrong in the next 4 yrs and continue to blame the Trump organization for what is wrong. Wait a second... Haven't the Democrats been in control of the Executive branch for the past 4 years? Were they not in the driver's seat for the past 4 years? Hasn't Trump been out of the driver's seat for the past 4 year but you are still blaming him for the issues that are wrong?

We promise to fix everything we screwed up or didn't fix the past 4 years so trust us, we will fix them in the next 4 years. Are you kidding me? This is your platform?

If you dropped off your car at a car shop and they couldn't fix it after numerous tries, would you take your car back there again? "We promise, we'll fix it this time." Sorry Charlie.

BuckyB93 wrote:

I heard a lot of Republicans complain about the lock her up chants. I heard even more Democrats complain about it. Any Democrats complaining about these chants at the DNC? I haven’t watched a lot of news and commentary and I admit that I don’t see much from the traditionally liberal media sites. So if I haven’t heard the Democrats complaining maybe I just missed it.

jeebling wrote:

Shouldn’t convicted felons get locked up?

drglnc wrote:

All I know is that Bidenomics is working and Kamaltoe is going to fix the economy. Did I get that right???

jeebling wrote:

I didn't watch Kamala's acceptance speech, but I guess it was just another empty pantsuit speech full of hate and lies.
Am I right?

RayR wrote:

Yes. It was revealing and revolting at the same time.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I didn't watch Kamala's acceptance speech, but I guess it was just another empty pantsuit speech full of hate and lies.
Am I right?

RayR wrote:

Yes, I was just watching Glen Beck's reaction. He essentially said the same thing.

Glenn Beck's HEATED Reaction to Kamala Harris' DNC Speech of LIES

RayR wrote:

Fair question, Brewha.
I try to post the videos or written commentary that is organized in a better, clearer way than I could do extemporaneously if I was replying to a post or contributing a thought. Usually the commentary is a reaction to what one of the postmodern progressives had said and they have the clip of the person stating their position or thoughts. In this way I do hear from the “opposition” but it is cherry picked. I watch CSPAN and Forbes which show unedited clips of politicians making their complete statements w/o commentary from a talking head. I think that gives me a better idea of what the opposition is saying w/o a talking head telling me what to think. I also watch other YouTube channels that have a person from both sides of the aisle, each making their arguments and having a quick watered down debate. I don’t read as much online commentary as I once did because my eyes get tired but I do read some. When I search a topic online the results are overwhelmingly left-leaning sources so I think I get a lot of opinions from the left of the political spectrum in that way. I do not have any left leaning sources that I watch regularly. That is probably a blind spot for me. I’m turned off by these sources because I think they are drenched in ideology. By this I mean to reference things like not recognizing the difference between a man and a woman or calling people white supremacists if they want a secure border, people who want to do away with the department of education hate children, etc., etc.. I realize that the conservative leaning sites have their own biased language but it doesn’t grate on me because I generally agree with their thinking on the underlying policy, even if their language or presentation is flawed or biased. Maybe I give myself too much credit, but I think I’m responsible in sorting out the bias in the sources that I usually consume. I hope this long reply isn’t word salad. I welcome your feedback if anything is on your mind. I know your post wasn’t directed to me but I thought it was a good discussion point.

jeebling wrote:

So...You would not watch, did not watch - but do study the opinions of other and listen hear say.

Is it really your opinion that your posting or just those of others?

Brewha wrote: