HockeyDad
a year ago

howcome it was no big deal when Kanye showed up in the White House wearing a dark long sleeve shirt, without a suit and tie? They fawned all over him as if they were glad someone like him thought it'd be cool to stop and say hello...no outrage about his choice of dress from the fashionista on the right...

delta1 wrote:



Because Kanye is black. Your post is racist. I’m literally shaking right now.
Gene363
  • Gene363
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

absolutely not, they can't defeat Russia...not as convinced about WWIII, but doesn't have to happen that way.
So yes, I am worried for Ukraine, but still worried about Russia.

frankj1 wrote:



Then why continue the killing?
JGKAMIN
a year ago

He also came to dinner with a nazi as his plus one..

frankj1 wrote:


At the White House? Fake news!
frankj1
a year ago

At the White House? Fake news!

JGKAMIN wrote:


Florida.
Real news.
Venue is not what I'd be concerned about as the number one issue.
HockeyDad
a year ago
So no takers?

You sending US troops to Ukraine?
Maybe join the International Legionnaires?
Maybe threaten to launch nuclear weapons at Russia if they don’t have all their forces out of Ukraine in 30 days?

Ok, fine then we will go with the current option. We will send 100 billion dollars a year to Ukraine as long as they keep killing Russians and eventually Russia will get tired of it and withdraw all their troops. This will be the Afghanistan/Vietnam method.

The Vietnam War went 20 years.
Afghan-Soviet War went 10 years.
US-Afghanistan War went 20 years.

Everyone good with staying the course with this plan?

JGKAMIN
a year ago

Florida.
Real news.
Venue is not what I'd be concerned about as the number one issue.

frankj1 wrote:


Sure, in a discussion of meetings with the sitting President in the White House you throw out one at Mar-a-Lago in 2022. 🤔

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/story-trumps-explosive-dinner-ye-nick-fuentes-rcna59010 
drglnc
a year ago

Remember a few months ago when Trump was a Nazi and MAGA semi-fascists? Good times! Now it Putin acolyte and Putin apologists!

HockeyDad wrote:



things are not always mutually exclusive...
frankj1
a year ago

Sure, in a discussion of meetings with the sitting President in the White House you throw out one at Mar-a-Lago in 2022. 🤔

JGKAMIN wrote:


have a talk with DMV about Biden crime family crap then, as long as you're policing.

And I didn't bring up Kanye.

I think I hit a nerve.
frankj1
a year ago

I go to your post in search of a place to respond to the general opinion here as a way to have a serious discourse free of testosterone supplements...and my point comes in the way of a question(s) that your words created in my mind immediately.

Are you suggesting they should have surrendered?
What would be a serious attempt to stop a war from the viewpoint of the victim other than that?


Trump got two standing ovations...one here, and one in the Kremlin.



frankj1 wrote:


I can't find that answer, at least not what you really believe what the victims of an invasion could/should do to stop a war...short of surrendering.
HockeyDad
a year ago

I can't find that answer, at least not what you really believe what the victims of an invasion could/should do to stop a war...short of surrendering.

frankj1 wrote:



Sure you did. You just didn’t like the answer but we are actually in agreement.

I said the Ukrainians should continue to die and kill as many Russians as possible.

Other options would be to surrender or get some other nation to fight your war for you.
DrMaddVibe
a year ago

So no takers?

You sending US troops to Ukraine?
Maybe join the International Legionnaires?
Maybe threaten to launch nuclear weapons at Russia if they don’t have all their forces out of Ukraine in 30 days?

Ok, fine then we will go with the current option. We will send 100 billion dollars a year to Ukraine as long as they keep killing Russians and eventually Russia will get tired of it and withdraw all their troops. This will be the Afghanistan/Vietnam method.

The Vietnam War went 20 years.
Afghan-Soviet War went 10 years.
US-Afghanistan War went 20 years.

Everyone good with staying the course with this plan?

HockeyDad wrote:




Nope.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/03/us-news/trump-pauses-us-military-aid-to-ukraine-after-zelensky-meet/ [/i]
DrMaddVibe
a year ago

Sure, in a discussion of meetings with the sitting President in the White House you throw out one at Mar-a-Lago in 2022. 🤔

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/story-trumps-explosive-dinner-ye-nick-fuentes-rcna59010 

JGKAMIN wrote:



So you like to be around anti-Semites and racists?

"But Trump may have been walking into a trap in Mar-a-Lago’s gilded halls — one that leveraged his own penchant for spectacle and showmanship against him. Ye arrived with three guests, including white nationalist and antisemite Nick Fuentes.

Trump has since said he didn’t know Fuentes or his background when they dined together, a claim Fuentes confirmed in an interview, but others at the crowded members-only club figured out his identity. News of the meeting prompted an avalanche of criticism, from some Republican rivals and allies of Trump and his then-week-old presidential campaign."


Ok, says more about you than anything. Odd you would bring this up too.

Are you trying to justify something that's indefensible?
DrMaddVibe
a year ago
New details reveal just how disastrous Zelensky’s faceplant really was…



Zelensky’s grip on power is crumbling, and the Ukraine war narrative is collapsing along with it. With the Biden regime out and America First in, President Trump and Vice President JD Vance are refusing to bankroll the deep state’s endless wars.

The “blank-check” era is over. Let’s face it, Americans are fed up with sending billions overseas while their own country spirals into the abyss. And now, with new revelations showing just how badly Zelensky fumbled his diplomatic chances, his so-called “strategic genius” looks more like blind arrogance. Now that the cards have fallen, the question isn’t whether Ukraine will get more aid—they won’t. The real question is whether Zelensky can survive politically.

And after what Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said, it’s looking even worse for Little Z. He pulled back the curtain on just how badly Zelensky fumbled this—turns out, it was even worse than we thought.

Trump sent Bessent to Kiev to bring Ukraine closer to the US and make it clear to Russia that there was no daylight between the two countries—hand-in-hand, shoulder-to-shoulder, the whole deal. But instead of locking in support, Zelensky waffled, stalled, and then backed out completely. Now, with Trump and Vance refusing to throw more American tax dollars into this dumpster fire, Zelensky’s blunder—his total miscalculation and failure to read the room—is coming back to haunt him.

https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/1895821332987707463 

None of this should surprise anyone who’s been even half awake during this “war.” The truth is, Zelensky isn’t interested in peace. He’s a puppet for the deep state, who want to take out Russia. Peace is not part of that plan—it’s all about NATO, as Zelensky makes painfully clear in the clip below.

Clandestine:

Did you catch that?

Zelensky admits that if Ukraine gets NATO membership, then he has “fulfilled his mission”.

His mission is not to govern Ukraine. His mission is NATO membership for Ukraine, which would immediately trigger WW3.

The reason his mission is WW3, is because that’s the only scenario where he MIGHT survive. His only way out is if NATO comes in and takes over the fight with Russia directly. That’s his plan, but realistically he would need the US in order to pull it off.

Zelensky, and his Deep State handlers, are literally trying to initiate full-scale WW3, in an effort to cover up the largest money laundering scheme in history, and crimes against humanity for bioweapon development.

That’s what we are witnessing.

This is not about Ukraine’s sovereignty. This is about covering up unfathomable criminality.

https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1896373700834041941 

War is the will of the few, not the many.

Speaking of, a viral clip is making the rounds on social media, allegedly showing Ukrainian soldiers hoping for an end to the war.

https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1896050370528624955 

Despite the propaganda media’s fake spin, real on-the-ground US support for Ukraine is looking mighty bleak these days. In fact, reporter Nick Sortor could barely find this pro-Zelensky event in DC. He raises a good question—are these embarrassingly small protests a sign that USAID funding has dried up? Did the Dems run out of cash to pay their professional activists? Think about it—for years, the uniparty and the propaganda media have pushed this narrative that Ukraine is America’s top priority—so where was the massive pro-Zelensky turnout? You’d think his White House heave-ho would’ve sparked an outpouring of support. Instead, all we got were crickets. Makes you wonder—was this so-called “overwhelming support” for Ukraine ever real?

Take a look:

https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1896349375112290357 

At this point, it’s clear—Zelensky didn’t actually “fumble” in the traditional sense. He played his hand exactly as he intended. He never wanted peace; he wants an endless war machine fueled by American tax dollars and is perfectly fine with World War III. When he was given the chance to secure US support under Trump, he stalled and backed out because real diplomacy was never the goal. As the old saying goes, when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.

https://revolver.news/2025/03/new-details-reveal-just-how-disastrous-zelensky-faceplant-really-was/ 



But but but Ukraine needs the US...we have to pay for more war...if we just send weapons we won't have to send our soldiers...I know in the past we've always been suckered into war with "advisors" but this time it's really really really different...


🐴


I bet Hunter is wondering when those sweet Ukrainian checks are going to hit his account.
Users browsing this topic