"No Two Snow Flakes Are The Same Shape”
How it started, my hypothesis :
In 1880, as a birthday gift, Wilson A. Bently received a microscope. Combining it
with a camera, he learned to make photomicrographs of snow crystals. (Really cool,
huh?). Having observed that the most interesting snow flakes (stellar) occurred only
during a certain portion of a warm front storm, Bently concentrated his collecting at those
times, ignoring columnar, needle, and plate crystals for the most part. When many of his
photographs were published in Snow Crystals, in 1931, Bently selected the “best looking”
pictures, not a scientific sample, some were retouched. His total collection of Snow
crystal photos was fewer than 6000, not enough to make a snowball.
But, since it’s the kind of amazing “fact” we like to believe, no one questioned the
statement that, “No two snow flakes are ever alike.” Rather they hurried to spread their
wonderful new “knowledge of nature”. And before long it was being taught as fact in
science lessons in elementary schools throughout the land.
Being accustomed to memorizing isolated factoids, few noticed that this assertion implies
a knowledge of every snow flake that ever was and ever will be. Nor did many think of
the statistical improbabilities involved. I have heard those who should certainly know
better try to salvage this myth.
“If you consider their molecular structure, then no two snow flakes are the same shape.”
In that case, no two ping -pong balls are the same shape either. Nor ball bearings . Can you live with that? If so, what’s the point in singling out snow flakes? Why not grains of sand, drops of water, or whatever?