tailgater
Thursday, February 6, 2003 6:36:00 PM
A recent tragedy in the Boston area has left a young mother-to-be in the hospital. Shot in the abdomen. The "fetus" is now dead.
They know who shot her. He will be charged with murder.
Why?
According to Pro-abortion (pro-choice)folks, that baby ain't a person. Not until birth.
Where's the consistency?
Mr.Mean
Thursday, February 6, 2003 7:01:00 PM
He should be shot in the abdomen and left to his own devices.
jjohnson28
Thursday, February 6, 2003 8:59:00 PM
Assault with a deadly weapon and practicing medicine whithout a liscense.What else can we do? It's the law...
RICKAMAVEN
Friday, February 7, 2003 12:32:00 AM
he will or won't be charged. i am a little confused.
jamesconnors
Friday, February 7, 2003 7:21:00 AM
f this scumbag puck ass teenager. he should be shot in the head....she didint want an abortion, the mother was 9 months pregnat. abortion is illegal after the begining of the third trimester anyway. this scumbag should burn!
tailgater
Friday, February 7, 2003 8:22:00 AM
I think he should burn in hell.
But if you're pro-abortion then the best you could want for him would be the assualt charge.
And what if the shooting happend one or two months ago? Would that negate the murder rap?
barryneedleman
Friday, February 7, 2003 9:20:00 AM
What I heard was the shooting triggered a live birth (in other words, the baby was born, breathed and was alive outside the womb) thus the murder charge.
Spiny Norman
Friday, February 7, 2003 10:14:00 AM
Isn't that the definition of "viability"? Ability to live outside the womb?