efm
  • efm
  • Connoisseur Topic Starter
Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:45:00 AM
Anybody seen the design chosen for the site? The artsy-fartsies have taken over. It's gotta be a joke. The inner courtyard looks more like a pile of rubble than it did on Sep 11.
divnmyk
Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:07:00 PM
Just checked it out... It's hard to believe that's what was chosen. What were the architects trying to say with their visions?
plabonte
Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:17:00 PM
I saw it too. The roofs are all slanted. Seems like a lot of space is wasted.
jd1
  • jd1
  • Herf-A-Holic
Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:10:00 PM
Looks like crap. Can't believe that's the best someone could come up with. I voted for the glass towers to mark the spot. Not surprising, it's winning.
donutboy2000
Friday, February 28, 2003 2:24:00 PM
Who is John Galt?
ducati996
Friday, February 28, 2003 3:59:00 PM
but it will be the tallest building in the world....bigger...taller....BETTER...that will show them!!!
RICKAMAVEN
Saturday, March 1, 2003 1:39:00 AM
there is a dvd called "the anatomy of a collapse." it gives clues as to why the wtc was vulnerable.

there is nothing political on this dvd.
jamesconnors
Saturday, March 1, 2003 5:22:00 AM
rick is right....good watch. the discovery channel put it on...go to the web site and pick it up really intersting