The notion that GWB "stole" the election by virtue of a Supreme Court decision is pure drivel ... to ignore the facts and continue to reiterate the drivel is clearly a parrot-like response.
The fact is, he got more electoral votes ... he won the election ... period ... I can understand someone whose liberal ideology prevents them from LIKING the facts ... were it the other way 'round, I wouldn't much like it either ... I recognize too, that the concept of the electoral college concept is not well understood and can see how those who DON'T understand it might feel that something is amiss with the process that a candidate can get get fewer popular votes, yet still prevail in the electoral college ... it's not a common phenomenon and in fact has happened only once before ... but the fact that it's an uncommon and little understood phenomenon does not in any way equate to the winner having "stolen" anything ...
Hey, the fact is, Kennedy was elected under what has to rank as much more questionable circumstances back in '60 as I'm sure you recall ... what has your research turned up on the subject of dead people having cast key voties in Cook County, IL and down in (I think) Nogales County TX? ... or is your research limited to only Republicans? ...
Clearly, almost 3 years after the election was over, if the continuing recounting of ballots hasn't changed anything (and it hasn't), it's time to accept the facts ... to deny them and continue a tirade against them is pretty much the equivilent of what a parrot could do ...