jimmy@ctconnect.com
Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:59:00 PM
... just me or anyone else here think that a great long-term stimulus package/incentive would be to offer, free of charge, a surgical sterilization and a $2,500.00 tax-free check to any of the following:

1) Any person w/o a minimum education of a high school diploma

2) Any person that has any felony conviction

3) Any person that has attended (completed or not) any substance abuse program

4) Any person being treated for any sort of mental illness

5) Any person that has ever received any form of state or federal aid (welfare, foodstamps, WIC)

6) Any person, under the age of 35, that is already the biological parent of 3 or more children

7) Any person with a known hereditary/genetic disorder

8) Any person that has ever been convicted of any illegal drug charge

9) If not included in the above or otherwise, any person that voted for Obama

tbrochin
Saturday, March 21, 2009 2:17:00 PM
I'd change number 6......

Any person age 25 or under with 3 or more kids.

No chit, I had to deal with a girl the other day that was 21...... and had 4 kids. 4 different daddies. None of them pay child support. All are convicted felons.

And she's living for free in gov't housing, getting WIC, and getting her cable and power paid for.

She's now pregnant with her 5th child. By another different daddy.

And she wanted to get an attitude with me and told me "I pay your salary." I called for a supervisor, 'cause I about lost it and hit the b!tch.

jimmy@ctconnect.com
Saturday, March 21, 2009 2:28:00 PM
^ ... how about any person, 18 yrs or older that became a biological parent while not yet attaining the legal age of majority?

(... she pays your salary, huh? LMAO ... I would have loved to have seen the look on your face ... )

jimmy@ctconnect.com
Saturday, March 21, 2009 2:33:00 PM
... and FYI and FWIW, I keep hearing/reading a lot of reports that a lot of the persons in those groups mentioned above DO NOT want to have children and WOULD OPT to have the surgery, however, that sort of medical procedure isn't covered under any free health care programs by our government ...

... would seem to me that we would save a LOT of money in the long run ...

10) Any person with living AIDS, Hepatitis, Herpes, Cirrhosis, etc ...

(ok, we'll even sterilize the dead ones with aids ... )

Whistlebritches
Sunday, March 22, 2009 10:47:00 AM
The surgical sterilization is a definate plus..........................LESS BORN LIBERALS!!!!!Using a method I much prefer to their way of handling such things.

Ron

Thunder.Gerbil
Sunday, March 22, 2009 10:53:00 AM
=========

2. Author: tbrochin Date: 03/21/2009 06:17 PM Reply

And she wanted to get an attitude with me and told me "I pay your salary." I called for a supervisor, ’cause I about lost it and hit the b!tch.

========

You should have just reached into your pocket and tossed her a penny and said "Here's your money back, keep the change."

herfidore
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:20:00 AM
This is the most ignorant post ever.
HockeyDad
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:24:00 AM
^Newbie!
cbc812
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:28:00 AM
^ #7

It's definitely in the running for the most ignorant post of the day, but certainly not ever. No - the fringe lunatics here are capable of EVEN MORE paranoia, prejudice, and rank stupidity.

There is a wealth of blind hatred and ignorance here, and it never ceases to amaze.

cbc812
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:29:00 AM
^ #1

Numbers 1, 4, and 6 would eliminate the Republican "base".

JadeRose
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:44:00 AM
"3) Any person that has attended (completed or not) any substance abuse program"

Nice....this coming from the guy that routinely brags about drinking at 8 in the morning. I have been a member of AA for many years, Jimmy. I am the Father of 2 daughters..hold a good job, pay my taxes, and shoulder my responsibilities. So you can pretty much go **** yourself. I'm sure you're one of those guys that thinks "Hitler had some good ideas..he just went a little too far."

Smoke_Rings
Monday, March 23, 2009 7:45:00 AM
I agree that this post is throwing stones. (Who ever has not commited a sin may be the first to throw!)

Put down the haterade. And for the record I DO NOT want my tax dollars being spent on other people's sterilizations!

lluvia
Monday, March 23, 2009 8:43:00 AM
This idea has its origins in eugenics...
jpotts
Monday, March 23, 2009 8:47:00 AM
10. Author: cbc812 Date: 03/23/2009 11:29 AM Reply

^ #1

Numbers 1, 4, and 6 would eliminate the Republican "base".

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Funny you should say this. Given where you work, you'd proably be better received by the Republican "base" than any other at this point.

jpotts
Monday, March 23, 2009 8:47:00 AM
Oh, and:

I'm very outraged (Defcon 3.521).

lluvia
Monday, March 23, 2009 8:54:00 AM
Some of us don't want to forget this:

FYI from the United States Memorial Museum...not meant as a judgment or an attack...just so we remember that these ideas seem to resurrect themselves and have devastating consequences...

THE BIOLOGICAL STATE: NAZI RACIAL HYGIENE, 1933-1939

RELATED ARTICLES RELATED LINKS

Nazism was “applied biology,” stated Hitler deputy Rudolf Hess. During the Third Reich, a politically extreme, antisemitic variation of eugenics determined the course of state policy. Hitler’s regime touted the “Nordic race” as its eugenic ideal and attempted to mold Germany into a cohesive national community that excluded anyone deemed hereditarily “less valuable” or “racially foreign.” Public health measures to control reproduction and marriage aimed at strengthening the “national body” by eliminating biologically threatening genes from the population. Many German physicians and scientists who had supported racial hygiene ideas before 1933 embraced the new regime’s emphasis on biology and heredity, the new career opportunities, and the additional funding for research.

Hitler’s dictatorship, backed by sweeping police powers, silenced critics of Nazi eugenics and supporters of individual rights. After all educational and cultural institutions and the media came under Nazi control, racial eugenics permeated German society and institutions. Jews, considered “alien,” were purged from universities, scientific research institutes, hospitals, and public health care. Persons in high positions who were viewed as politically “unreliable” met a similar fate.

THE BATTLE FOR BIRTHS

Echoing ongoing eugenic fears, the Nazis trumpeted population experts’ warnings of “national death” and aimed to reverse the trend of falling birthrates. The Marital Health Law of October 1935 banned unions between the “hereditarily healthy” and persons deemed genetically unfit. Getting married and having children became a national duty for the “racially fit.” In a speech on September 8, 1934, Hitler proclaimed: “In my state, the mother is the most important citizen.”

Acting on earlier eugenic concerns about the effects of alcohol, tobacco, and syphilis, the Nazi regime sponsored research, undertook public education campaigns, and enacted laws that together aimed at eliminating “genetic poisons” linked to birth defects and genetic damage to later generations. In 1936 the Reich Central Office for Combating Homosexuality and Abortion was established to step up efforts to prevent acts that obstructed reproduction. In a 1937 speech linking homosexuality to a falling birthrate, German police chief Heinrich Himmler stated: “A people of good race which has too few children has a one-way ticket to the grave.”

I don't know any Republicans who would like to resemble the party mentioned above.

cbc812
Monday, March 23, 2009 10:03:00 AM
This isn't a partisan thing - inappropriate to take a shot.

Neither party has the market cornered on saying stupid, divisive, and scary things, which is exactly what is contained in the OP.

topper7788
Monday, March 23, 2009 10:18:00 AM
Guys, I think (HOPE) Jimmy was kidding? right?
lluvia
Monday, March 23, 2009 10:36:00 AM
just to clarify

I in no way associate these ideas with the Republican party, I think I misread 14.'s intent.

And was trying to draw a distance between the Republicans and the ideas expressed in 1.

my apologies to Republicans

I do not see the this "proposal" as representative of either party.

Thanks, cbc812...your post made me reread 14.

cbc812
Monday, March 23, 2009 10:44:00 AM
^ #19

And just to clarify my last post, I was saying that it was inappropriate for me to make a party affiliation comment.

As I stated before - neither party has cornered the market on stupidity. As far as the OP goes, if it's a joke, it's not funny, and in any case one must wonder WTF sort of sociopath posts this kind of crap in public, whether in jest or not.