wheelrite
15 years ago

They target low income minority neighborhoods to buid their abortion mills.They kill over 300,000 yet to be born babies every year.They and the Obama Regime are now exporting Planned Parenthood to under deveolped countries

and the best part..

YOUR Tax dollars help pay for it !!!


very sad indeed...

Thanks Margaret Sanger and Barak !!
fiddler898
15 years ago
Hyperbole raised to an art form.
wheelrite
15 years ago
Truth not hyperbole...
HockeyDad
15 years ago
You gotta give them credit for their success rate. Sometimes you gotta break a few eggs.
cbc812
15 years ago
Misinformation raised to an art form and disseminated to eager recipients.

Willful ignorance can then be shouted from the mountaintops.
wheelrite
15 years ago
Um?
what misinformation ?

It's all FACT.So,instead of being a barnacle on the bottom of the "Good Ship Liberal" look into it...
ZRX1200
15 years ago
Weeeeee!!!!!!
I get to disagree with cbc12 for the 1st time in awhile.
frankj1
15 years ago
This painful decision is not liberal vs conservative as I am quite certain there have been many abortions chosen by people of all political beliefs, To approach this issue with the goal of minimizing or eliminating the decision to abort requires more than name calling. Personally, I am pro-choice but could never live with aborting a pregnancy. That's my choice. I do not wish to force my views on others by laws. Nor should the vast conservative majority here that rant and rail against too many laws invading their personal lives.

Calling pro-choice people "pro-abortion" is counterproductive.. It ends any chance of advancing your cause. It ends all intelligent exchange of ideas. I am pro-choice, and I am anti-abortion for my family. But I am not in a position to tell you what to do and I strongly resent being called anything other than what I am. This resentment does not enhance progress for your desires.

I would have tons of respect for you folks if you organized qualified families to work through adoption agencies in your communities instead of spouting questionable shock value statistics on cigar forums.

Don't drink and drive, mkay?

Frank
tailgater
15 years ago

This painful decision is not liberal vs conservative as I am quite certain there have been many abortions chosen by people of all political beliefs, To approach this issue with the goal of minimizing or eliminating the decision to abort requires more than name calling. Personally, I am pro-choice but could never live with aborting a pregnancy. That's my choice. I do not wish to force my views on others by laws. Nor should the vast conservative majority here that rant and rail against too many laws invading their personal lives.

Calling pro-choice people "pro-abortion" is counterproductive.. It ends any chance of advancing your cause. It ends all intelligent exchange of ideas. I am pro-choice, and I am anti-abortion for my family. But I am not in a position to tell you what to do and I strongly resent being called anything other than what I am. This resentment does not enhance progress for your desires.

I would have tons of respect for you folks if you organized qualified families to work through adoption agencies in your communities instead of spouting questionable shock value statistics on cigar forums.

Don't drink and drive, mkay?

Frank

frankj1 wrote:



Actually, Frank, Planned Parenthood is indeed "pro-abortion".
From the home page of their website, they offer:

Facts on:
-abortion
-birth control
-morning after pill
-sexually transmitted diseases

What's missing here?
Oh yeah. ADOPTION.
It may be hidden within their site, but it's not front and center. And it's not encouraged.

I know too many people that had to mortgage their house and jump through hoops to adopt a baby, and then they ended up going over to China/Korea/etc to make it happen.
And even more appauling is when my cousin wanted to put her yet to be born child up for adoption. She contact planned parenthood and was told that "pregnancy is difficult. It will interfere with your life. You should consider abortion." or words to that effect.

Regardless of whether one is pro choice or life, the subject of this this thread, Planned Parenthood, is pro abortion.
I don't mean to "shock" anyone with this statement. I am merely printing the truth.
frankj1
15 years ago
Well stated and well researched. This is the right approach and I learned from you, thank you. Obviously I do not support encouraging abortions, I would never be able to forgive myself if I had chosen that alternative (I have 3 grown children).

But to all those here that like to make white noise...do something or shut up already. You have millions like me that are for women's right to choose and hope for the choice of life, but you push us into defending positions we do not really represent. You approached my post with intelligence, not hysteria. Thanks for the respect.

My cousins were turned down for adoption at every turn, went to Guatemala as a last resort. They are well off but a bit old. But their now 5 year old boy may be the luckiest child in the world. And they are pro-choice.

I have heard from others that PP presented options for unwanted children (ashamed to admit I have not read their stuff) and they did not feel pushed toward abortion. Has anyone here ever actually sought their consultation, and what did you feel was their agenda?

Am I to believe that money can be made by PP?????
frankj1
15 years ago
I also really resent the cavalier and inflammatory use of terms like Auschwitz here (and other Nazi terms regarding Israel) in these posts.
A little respect is in order.
ZRX1200
15 years ago
Perhaps you should research the woman Wheel referenced and her writings/beliefs of Eugenics bro. Then you might get the reference...but in most your comments I do concur.
cbc812
15 years ago
I thought that lower birth rates in low income, minority neigborhoods would make you guys happy. After all, these are the same people who grow up to pop out babies for thousands a month and drive their Caddys down to the welfare office to pick up their check, thereby stealing from hardworking Americans what should rightfully be stolen by the billionaires who own the politicians.

So, wouldn't anything that ends the scourge of "welfare breeding" be a good thing?

Or should the women have these babies they can't support and then just let them suffer and rot instead of allowing them to be a drag on corporate subsidies or tax cuts for millionaires?

Which is it? Are the anti-PP crusaders going to support those unwated babies? Are you ready to make voluntary contributins to the welfare system to back up your religious conviction here?

Please explain. This is terribly confusing.
jackconrad
15 years ago
Unfortunatlley dey don't feed dem babies dey takes da moneys to buy dem some crak an den chases it down wit hooch! Baby still cryin, Can't affords da gas ta start da Caddy...

Pray fo dem !
HockeyDad
15 years ago

I thought that lower birth rates in low income, minority neigborhoods would make you guys happy. After all, these are the same people who grow up to pop out babies for thousands a month and drive their Caddys down to the welfare office to pick up their check, thereby stealing from hardworking Americans what should rightfully be stolen by the billionaires who own the politicians.

So, wouldn't anything that ends the scourge of "welfare breeding" be a good thing?

Or should the women have these babies they can't support and then just let them suffer and rot instead of allowing them to be a drag on corporate subsidies or tax cuts for millionaires?

Which is it? Are the anti-PP crusaders going to support those unwated babies? Are you ready to make voluntary contributins to the welfare system to back up your religious conviction here?

Please explain. This is terribly confusing.

cbc812 wrote:




The explanation is easy. You were wrong.
fiddler898
15 years ago
^#13, to expand on #14, you are wrong to believe that reason and logic have any place on the boards. Take your rational thinking elsewhere, it has little currency here.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
That wasn't reason, logic, or rational thinking.
wheelrite
15 years ago

Misinformation raised to an art form and disseminated to eager recipients.

Willful ignorance can then be shouted from the mountaintops.

cbc812 wrote:




YOUR ignorance is showing.

Read and learn...



Margaret Sanger
Founder of Planned Parenthood

In Her Own Words


"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race
(Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)

Copyright © 2001 Diane S. Dew www.dianedew.com

Margaret Sanger (1883-1966)
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12


Sounds like Auschwitz,yes ????

wheel,
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago


There is a large portion of this movie that tackles her roots in Eugenics, the Nazi/Arab cling to them and Planned Parenthood.

This also details where critical thinking and questioning the political motives of others can make your professional career come to a crashing halt.

Most people didn't even take the time to see this insightful documentary. Most SHOULD!
rfenst
15 years ago
Am I missing something huge here?


I thought SCOTUS ruled that abortion is LEGAL...
Users browsing this topic